Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local access
-
DeliveryRepeatedly invoke Windows Key Guard operation
-
ExploitWin race-condition timing window
-
ExecutionCorrupt shared resource state
-
PersistExecute with elevated privileges
-
ImpactFull local system compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Concurrency control, locking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must already have authenticated local access with at least low privileges (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - this is not remotely exploitable and requires an existing foothold on the target. No user interaction is needed (UI:N). The principal limiting factor is the race condition itself (AC:H): exploitation depends on winning a narrow timing window in Windows Key Guard's access to a shared resource, which is non-deterministic and cannot be reliably automated (SSVC Automatable: no), so success typically requires repeated attempts and favorable timing/scheduling conditions. Realistic risk is concentrated on multi-user systems (RDS/terminal servers, shared workstations, jump boxes) where untrusted low-privileged users can run code; single-user, well-isolated endpoints are far less exposed. |
| Impact | The signals are internally consistent and point to a genuine-but-not-urgent local escalation issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 7.0) shows local access with LOW privileges already required, and critically AC:H - a high-complexity race that an attacker must win a timing window to trigger - which tempers the otherwise-total C/I/A impact. This aligns with SSVC (Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, Technical Impact: total): the 'total' impact matches the full C/I/A compromise, while 'Automatable: no' matches AC:H because a timing race cannot be reliably scripted at scale. EPSS of 0.24% (16th percentile) reinforces low near-term exploitation likelihood, and there is no KEV listing and no public PoC. This is a patch-in-normal-cycle item, not a drop-everything emergency; it becomes higher priority on multi-user or shared/terminal-server hosts where untrusted local users have footholds. No signals conflict - the low EPSS, no-exploitation SSVC, and AC:H all agree that real-world risk is currently modest despite the high technical impact. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged foothold on a Windows host - for example a standard user account, or code running after a phishing-based initial access - repeatedly triggers the Key Guard operation to hit the narrow synchronization window. On a successful race win, they corrupt the shared resource's state to execute with elevated privileges, gaining full control of the machine. No public exploit code is identified at this time, and the AC:H rating means the attacker likely needs many attempts, but the payoff is total system compromise. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Jul 20, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Windows Key Guard affects all supported Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server releases (Server 2019 through 2025), where a race condition in the synchronization of a shared resource lets an already-authenticated local user win a timing window to elevate to higher privileges. Microsoft has released patches and rates it Important (CVSS 7.0); there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none, though the technical impact is rated total. EPSS is low at 0.24% (16th percentile), consistent with a high-complexity local flaw rather than a widely-scanned remote target.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Local privilege escalation in Windows Key Guard affecting Windows 10 (1809/21H2/22H2), Windows 11 (24H2/25H2/26H1), and Windows Server 2019/2022/2025 allows an already-authenticated local attacker to win a race condition (CWE-362) and gain higher privileges. Reported by Microsoft with a patch now available; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. The CVSS 7.8 rating reflects full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact once the timing window is exploited.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update: Vendor-released patch is available, with fixed builds of 10.0.17763.9020 (1809 / Server 2019), 10.0.19044.7548 (21H2), 10.0.19045.7548 (22H2), 10.0.20348.5386 (Server 2022), 10.0.26100.8875 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.8875 (25H2), 10.0.28000.2269 (26H1), and 10.0.26100.33158 (Server 2025) - install the relevant cumulative update via Windows Update or your patch-management tooling, guided by the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378. Microsoft has not published a supported workaround for this component, so patching is the only reliable fix; as an interim compensating control, restrict interactive and local logon rights so untrusted users cannot run code on affected hosts (most impactful on shared/RDS/terminal-server and jump-box systems), and monitor for anomalous local process behavior - noting these controls reduce exposure but do not remediate the underlying race condition. Prioritize multi-user and Server Core hosts where low-privileged local access is more likely.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 21 packages in microsoft, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Windows Key Guard is a Windows platform security component involved in protecting cryptographic key material. The root cause is CWE-362, a concurrent execution flaw using a shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition'): two or more threads/processes access shared state without adequate locking, creating a time-of-check-to-time-of-use window an attacker can exploit to manipulate privileged operations. The CPE set (cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:windows_10_version_1809 through windows_server_2025) confirms this is a core operating-system-level component present across the entire modern Windows codebase rather than an optional add-on, which is why every current client and server SKU is enumerated as affected.
Know when Windows Server 2019 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local, already-authenticated low-priv attacker (AV:L/PR:L) must win a non-deterministic timing race (AC:H); successful escalation yields full system control, so C/I/A all High.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionNVD
Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Key Guard allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
Windows Key Guard (affecting Windows 10, 11, and Server 2019-2025) contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability that allows already-authenticated users to elevate permissions through a race condition in shared resource synchronization. The vulnerability impacts all supported Windows editions and carries a high CVSS score (7.0), requiring immediate patching to prevent internal threat actors or compromised accounts from escalating privileges to administrative level.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Race conditions occur when multiple concurrent requests exploit the brief time gap between checking a condition and acting upon it (TOCTOU - Time of Check, Time of Use).
More in Windows Server 2019
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
Windows Win32k contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability enabling local privilege escalation to SYSTEM, exploited by
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
Internet Shortcut Files Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.1), this vulnerability is rem
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
EUVD-2026-43925
GHSA-p52g-fgpm-gpx8
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB