Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local access
-
DeliveryInvoke vulnerable NTFS parsing path
-
ExploitOverflow kernel stack buffer
-
ExecutionHijack kernel control flow
-
ImpactExecute code as SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already be authenticated and able to execute code locally on the target Windows system (CVSS PR:L, AV:L), then trigger the vulnerable NTFS metadata-handling path - for example by presenting a crafted volume/filesystem structure or invoking the affected driver operation. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and no special non-default configuration is called out: the defect is in the core NTFS driver present in default Windows installations across the listed builds. The limiting factors are that this is not remotely reachable (local vector only), needs a pre-existing low-privileged account or code-execution foothold, and CISA SSVC rates it not automatable, so it cannot be trivially wormed or mass-exploited. |
| Impact | The signals are internally consistent and point to a genuine but non-urgent risk. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) describes a local attacker with some existing privilege achieving total compromise, and CISA SSVC agrees: Technical Impact 'total', but Exploitation 'none' and Automatable 'no' - meaning no observed exploitation and no reliable mass-automation path, which fits a local EoP that requires code execution on the host first. EPSS of 0.34% (26th percentile) and the absence of a KEV listing reinforce low near-term exploitation likelihood. There is no conflicting data here: everything (local vector, low EPSS, SSVC 'none', not KEV) aligns to 'important but not actively exploited.' The main caveat is that NTFS EoP bugs are historically attractive as the second stage of a chain after initial access (e.g., paired with a phishing/RCE foothold), so the low EPSS reflects standalone exploitation odds, not the value to an attacker who is already on the box. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged foothold on a Windows host - for example a standard user account gained via phishing or a compromised service - invokes the vulnerable NTFS code path with crafted filesystem metadata to overflow a kernel stack buffer and elevate to SYSTEM. Given AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N, no user interaction and only low existing privileges are needed, though the attacker must first be able to run code locally; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Jul 20, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Microsoft Windows NTFS driver lets an already-authenticated attacker overflow a stack buffer (CWE-121) to run code with full system-level privileges. It affects a broad swath of supported Windows client and server builds, from Windows 10 1607 and Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H1 and Server 2025. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and CISA's SSVC framework currently rates exploitation as none; EPSS is low at 0.34% (26th percentile), so this is a patch-on-schedule elevation-of-privilege bug rather than an emergency.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Local privilege escalation in the Microsoft Windows NTFS driver allows an already-authenticated, low-privileged user to gain elevated (likely SYSTEM) privileges by triggering a stack-based buffer overflow, contingent on user interaction. The flaw spans a broad range of supported Windows client and server releases, from Windows 10 1607 and Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H1 and Server 2025. Microsoft has issued a patch and reported the issue itself; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft security update that raises each affected OS to at least its fixed build listed above (e.g., Windows 11 24H2/Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.8875/33158, Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5386, Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23291) via Windows Update, WSUS, or your patch-management tooling; details are in the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789. No filesystem-level workaround is published for an in-kernel NTFS parsing flaw, so patching is the only reliable fix. Until updates are deployed, reduce exposure by limiting who can run code or mount arbitrary volumes on affected hosts - restrict local/interactive logon rights, tighten application allow-listing to prevent attacker-supplied binaries from executing (the required foothold for this local EoP), and monitor for unexpected privilege escalations; note these controls only shrink the population of attackers who can reach the vulnerable code and do not remediate the defect.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 18 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
NTFS is the default on-disk filesystem for Windows, implemented largely in the kernel-mode driver ntfs.sys, which parses filesystem metadata (MFT records, attributes, reparse points, mount points) from disk or mounted volumes. CWE-121, a stack-based buffer overflow, indicates that a fixed-size stack buffer in this parsing/handling path is written past its bounds using attacker-influenced length or content. Because the code runs in kernel context, corrupting the kernel stack can overwrite return addresses or adjacent locals to hijack control flow. The CPE and EUVD data confirm the affected component is the Microsoft Windows operating system itself across many editions (windows_10_version_1607/1809/21H2/22H2, windows_11_version_24H2/25H2/26H1, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations), consistent with a shared kernel filesystem defect rather than an application-layer bug.
Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local authenticated low-privileged attacker (AV:L/PR:L) triggers an in-kernel NTFS overflow with no user interaction, yielding SYSTEM-level total compromise (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionNVD
Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows NTFS allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows NTFS driver (CVE-2026-49789) allows any authenticated user on affected Windows systems to escalate to system-level privileges. No public exploit has been identified at this time; however, the vulnerability affects a broad install base (Windows 10, 11, Server 2012-2025) and carries significant risk if exploited post-compromise. A vendor patch is available and should be deployed through standard change management to mitigate lateral movement and data breach risks.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.
More in Windows Server 2012
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit
EUVD-2026-43804
GHSA-pw7v-3rcp-9vjc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB