Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticated low-priv local access
  2. Delivery
    Issue crafted ioctl to kernel driver
  3. Exploit
    Trigger use-after-free, reclaim freed object
  4. Execution
    Corrupt kernel memory, hijack execution
  5. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM / escalate privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access to a Windows host running an affected NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla) and an already-authenticated low-privileged user account (PR:L, AV:L) that can invoke the kernel-mode driver. Exploitation is further limited by high attack complexity (AC:H): the use-after-free (CWE-416) depends on winning a race or precise kernel-pool reclamation, so reliable exploitation is non-trivial. No user interaction is needed (UI:N), and no network exposure applies - this cannot be triggered remotely. Highest-value targets are shared/multi-user, VDI, or cloud-GPU deployments where local low-priv-to-SYSTEM escalation crosses a trust boundary.

Impact

This is a genuine but not top-tier priority - it rates 7.8 (HIGH) on CVSS 3.1, yet every signal points to a local privilege-escalation class issue rather than a wormable remote threat. The vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H requires local access (AV:L) and already-held low privileges (PR:L), and notably carries AC:H - high attack complexity, typical of use-after-free bugs that depend on winning a timing/allocation race in the kernel-mode driver. The scope change (S:C) plus full C:H/I:H/A:H is what drags the base score up to 7.8 despite the local, complex, authenticated preconditions. No EPSS probability, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so there is no evidence of active exploitation - treat exploitation status as no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The 'RCE' tag overstates the reachability: with AV:L this is local code execution / privilege escalation, not network RCE. Net: patch on a normal cadence; prioritize on multi-user, VDI, or cloud-GPU hosts where a low-priv local user gaining SYSTEM matters most.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged local user on a Windows host with an NVIDIA GPU driver issues crafted calls to the kernel-mode driver to trigger a use-after-free, then grooms the kernel pool to reclaim the freed object and hijack execution. Because AC:H, success depends on winning a race/allocation condition, but a reliable exploit would yield kernel code execution and SYSTEM-level privilege escalation. No public POC is referenced at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

Local privilege escalation in NVIDIA Display Driver on Windows allows an authenticated low-privileged user to trigger a use-after-free in the kernel-mode driver, potentially enabling code execution with SYSTEM privileges, denial of service, information disclosure, or data tampering. The vulnerability requires local access and high attack complexity (AC:H) due to race conditions or kernel-pool reclamation, making reliable exploitation non-trivial, and it is not known to be actively exploited. The highest risk is in shared multi-user, VDI, or cloud-GPU environments where crossing a trust boundary from low-privileged user to kernel is significant.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch as specified in the NVIDIA security advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 for your specific GPU model and driver branch. Until patched, restrict local interactive access to trusted users only, as the vulnerability requires an authenticated local account; this may impact usability in multi-user or shared environments but reduces the attack surface. Additionally, enforce least privilege and monitor for anomalous kernel activity. Note that disabling the GPU driver entirely is not a practical mitigation due to functional impact, and no network-based workarounds are applicable because the vulnerability cannot be triggered remotely.

Affected VersionsENISA

GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92
Guest driver 582.53(All versions prior to and including vGPU 19.5)
Guest driver 596.36(All versions prior to and including vGPU 20.1)
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver's kernel-mode component on Windows. Use-after-free occurs when the driver frees a memory object but continues to reference it, allowing an attacker to manipulate the freed memory (e.g., via heap grooming) to achieve arbitrary code execution in kernel mode (ring 0). The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates that an authenticated local user must invoke the driver, and exploitation is complex due to timing or memory reclamation requirements. The scope change (S:C) reflects that the vulnerable driver can impact the entire operating system. Affected products per CPE include NVIDIA GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla drivers, covering consumer, professional, and data-center GPU lines. No network vector is present; this is strictly a local escalation issue.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local kernel driver reached by an authenticated low-priv user (AV:L/PR:L); UAF race gives AC:H; kernel compromise crosses to SYSTEM (S:C) with full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 7.0 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

The NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode driver through which a user might trigger a use-after-free condition. Successful exploitation of this issue could lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

NVIDIA's Windows Display Driver contains a high-severity local privilege escalation flaw (CVE-2026-47579) that lets a low-privileged user on a machine escalate to SYSTEM-level control of the operating system, with potential outcomes including code execution, data tampering, information disclosure, or crash-driven outages. Because exploitation requires local access and is technically difficult to perform reliably, the greatest exposure sits in shared-use estates - multi-user workstations, VDI pools, and cloud-GPU instances - where many users already have a foothold on the same host and a single escalation can cross a critical trust boundary affecting every workload on that system. Leadership should care because the affected driver is ubiquitous across GPU-enabled endpoints and servers, and no vendor patch is yet available, leaving compensating controls as the only near-term defense.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include minimizing the number of low-privileged users with local interactive logon on shared, VDI, and cloud-GPU hosts; enforcing least privilege so standard users hold no administrative rights; segmenting or restricting access to GPU-enabled systems that cannot be patched; enabling and tuning EDR to detect anomalous kernel-mode driver behavior and use-after-free exploitation attempts; limiting concurrent sessions on multi-user GPU hosts to reduce the chance of winning race conditions; and removing or disabling the NVIDIA display driver on systems whose workloads do not require it. Monitor NVIDIA's security advisory channel and deploy the fixed display driver release as soon as it is published.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GPU drivers ship on vast numbers of Windows workstations and servers
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy