Skip to main content

NVIDIA Display Driver CVE-2026-47518

| EUVDEUVD-2026-90167 MEDIUM
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (CWE-732)
2026-09-30 nvidia GHSA-2cv3-4fc3-qggh
6.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: nvidia
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain privileged local access to host
  2. Delivery
    Interact with GPU driver secure microcontroller interface
  3. Exploit
    Abuse incorrect permission assignment to write protected memory
  4. Execution
    Achieve code execution in microcontroller context
  5. Impact
    Escalate privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Permission assignment review
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess privileged local access (PR:H - administrator/root or equivalent) on a system running a vulnerable NVIDIA GPU Display Driver, and to interact with the driver's secure microcontroller component to abuse an incorrect permission assignment (CWE-732) against protected memory. High attack complexity (AC:H) further limits exploitation, implying a race, specific timing, or non-trivial state that must be met rather than a deterministic one-shot trigger. No user interaction is required (UI:N). Affected are GeForce (only Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal architecture GPUs), RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla driver branches below the fixed versions listed in NVIDIA bulletin 5861 (e.g., GeForce < 582.78/610.60/615.71.09/616.56 depending on branch; Tesla and RTX/Quadro/NVS various branch-specific fixes). The privileged-access and high-complexity prerequisites are the primary factors limiting realistic risk.

Impact

This is a genuine but lower-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L) describes a locally-exploitable flaw that requires an attacker to already hold HIGH privileges (PR:H) on the host AND overcome HIGH attack complexity (AC:H) - two significant gates that sharply limit real-world exploitability despite the C:H/I:H code-execution impact. The 6.0 base score is accurate and notably lower than the PR:L NVIDIA memory-corruption siblings (7.8) because of the PR:H + AC:H combination, and its A:L (rather than the A:H seen across most sibling CVEs) further caps it. EPSS is not provided, there is NO CISA KEV listing, and NO public exploit is identified at time of analysis, so there is no external signal of active or imminent exploitation. Signals are consistent - there is no network-vs-local conflict here; the vector and description both agree this is a privileged-local issue. Note the input 'RCE' tag overstates reach: with AV:L this is local code execution, not remote. Bottom line: a real vulnerability warranting patching in scheduled maintenance, but not an emergency given the privileged-access and high-complexity prerequisites.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained privileged (administrator/root) local access to a workstation or GPU compute host performs a difficult-to-win sequence against the NVIDIA GPU driver's secure microcontroller component, abusing an incorrect permission assignment to write to protected memory that should be off-limits. Winning the race or condition allows them to execute code within the secured microcontroller context and escalate privileges further into the driver/firmware trust boundary. No public proof-of-concept exists, and the high attack complexity means reliable exploitation is non-trivial.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

Privilege escalation and potential code execution in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux arise from an incorrect permission assignment (CWE-732) within a secure microcontroller component, allowing an attacker who already holds privileged local access to write to protected memory that should be restricted. Exploitation is gated by two strong prerequisites - the CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N) requires local access with administrator/root-equivalent privileges and high attack complexity - so this is a genuine but lower-tier risk that primarily matters as a post-compromise escalation or persistence primitive rather than a standalone entry vector. Affected branches include GeForce (only Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal architecture GPUs), RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla data-center drivers below the branch-specific fixed versions in NVIDIA bulletin 5861; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV).

RemediationAI

Apply the NVIDIA driver build that corresponds to your product family and branch as documented in NVIDIA security bulletin 5861 (https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861): GeForce systems on Maxwell, Volta, or Pascal GPUs require 582.78 or later (or the branch-appropriate 610.60, 615.71.09, or 616.56 fix), while RTX, Quadro, and NVS deployments need 582.78, 595.91.07, 596.86, 610.57.04, 610.88, 615.71.09, or 616.92 depending on branch, and Tesla data-center drivers need 580.178.04, 595.91.07, 596.86, 610.57.04, 610.88, 615.71.09, or 616.92. Windows and Linux packages must both be updated, and where the GPU is passed through to a guest OS the host and guest drivers should be treated as separate exposures and patched on each side. Vendor-released patch: branch-specific fixed driver versions per NVIDIA bulletin 5861. Until maintenance windows permit the driver upgrade, the practical compensating controls are administrative rather than technical: because exploitation requires pre-existing administrator/root or equivalent local privilege (PR:H) and high attack complexity (AC:H), enforce least privilege so that interactive and service accounts do not hold local administrator/root on GPU-equipped workstations and servers, restrict who can load kernel-mode driver components or install display drivers, and monitor for driver-level tampering and unexpected privileged writes to protected memory regions; note that disabling or removing the NVIDIA display driver entirely (falling back to a basic/generic display driver) removes the vulnerable component but sacrifices GPU acceleration, CUDA/compute workloads, and multi-monitor/3D functionality, so it is only viable on non-GPU-dependent hosts. There is no vendor-released configuration toggle that disables the secure microcontroller path independently of the driver.

Affected VersionsENISA

RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
Tesla All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
Tesla All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 596.86
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88
GeForce All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78
GeForce All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
GeForce All driver versions prior to 595.91.07

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw lives in a secure microcontroller component of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver - the firmware/driver subsystem that manages privileged, protected state on behalf of the GPU and the host OS. CWE-732 (Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) means the component applies overly permissive access controls to a memory region or resource that should be restricted to the most privileged context, so a caller holding privileged local access can reach and modify memory the design intended to keep isolated. Because the affected asset is GPU driver memory handling, successful abuse yields a corruption/control-flow primitive capable of code execution in a sensitive context and escalation of privileges, with high confidentiality and integrity impact (C:H/I:H) and only partial availability impact (A:L) and no scope change (S:U). The high attack complexity (AC:H) suggests the write requires a specific timing window, state, or race rather than a deterministic single call, and the PR:H rating confirms a high-privileged local actor is the baseline assumption. CPE data maps the exposure across nvidia:geforce, nvidia:rtx,_quadro,_nvs, and nvidia:tesla driver families; the Windows and Linux driver packages both carry the vulnerable component.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 6.0 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
vuln.today AI 6.0 MEDIUM

Local vector and privileged, complex exploitation of a driver microcontroller justify AV:L/PR:H/AC:H; code execution supports C:H/I:H while availability impact is limited (A:L), matching the vendor.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE HIGH
Red Hat 6.0 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in a secure microcontroller component, where incorrect permission assignment for a critical resource allows an attacker with privileged local access to modify protected memory that should be restricted. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution and escalation of privileges.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GeForce/RTX/Quadro/Tesla drivers ship on vast numbers of desktops, workstations, and compute hosts
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy