Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain UFM administrative credentials
  2. Delivery
    Gain access to management network segment
  3. Exploit
    Craft malicious IBDiagnet API request with injected shell commands
  4. Execution
    UFM passes unsanitized input to command interpreter
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary OS commands as UFM service user
  6. Impact
    Escalate privileges or exfiltrate fabric management data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Three concrete prerequisites must all be satisfied: (1) Valid NVIDIA UFM Enterprise administrative credentials - the CVSS PR:H metric explicitly confirms that high-privilege authentication is mandatory; this is not inferred from description text alone. (2) Network adjacency to the UFM management interface - AV:A means the attacking host must reside on the same local network segment or VLAN as the UFM server; internet-based attackers cannot reach the endpoint without first pivoting through an internal system. (3) The IBDiagnet API must be accessible - as a core diagnostic component of UFM, it is expected to be enabled in standard deployments rather than requiring special activation. Exploitation is meaningfully limited by the high-privilege credential requirement (eliminating unauthenticated and low-privilege attack paths) and the adjacency constraint (eliminating remote internet exploitation without a prior foothold). There is no indication of a user-interaction requirement or configuration toggle beyond standard UFM administrative access.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.8 reflects a meaningful reduction from the high C/I/A impact due to two compounding barriers: administrative authentication (PR:H) and network adjacency (AV:A). Real-world exploitation requires an actor who already holds UFM administrative credentials and is positioned on the management network segment - a threat model that applies primarily to insider threats, compromised jump hosts, or post-pivot lateral movement rather than opportunistic internet-facing attacks. EPSS data is absent from the available intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified statistically. No CISA KEV listing exists, and no public POC has been identified, both consistent with a vulnerability that demands high-privilege access and is unlikely to attract commodity exploitation. Despite the low-to-medium CVSS score, the technical impact class (code execution, privilege escalation, information disclosure on a fabric management platform) is significant for HPC and AI infrastructure operators where UFM controls critical interconnect fabric. CVSS and description are fully consistent - no conflicting signals detected.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained valid administrative credentials to NVIDIA UFM Enterprise - whether through credential theft, phishing, or reuse from another compromised system - connects from a host on the management network segment and crafts an API request to the IBDiagnet endpoint with shell metacharacters or command separators injected into a request parameter. The UFM service passes the unsanitized input to a system command interpreter, executing the attacker's payload with the privileges of the UFM process, enabling privilege escalation, lateral movement within the InfiniBand fabric management plane, or exfiltration of fabric topology and credential data. No public exploit code is known at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 2.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 25, 2026

Command injection in NVIDIA UFM Enterprise's IBDiagnet API allows an authenticated administrator with adjacency-level network access to execute arbitrary OS commands on the host system, potentially achieving full compromise. All major release trains are affected - GA, LTS 2023, LTS 2024, and LTS 2025 - as confirmed by NVIDIA's own advisory and NVD CPE data. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, keeping real-world opportunistic risk constrained by the high privilege and network adjacency prerequisites.

RemediationAI

Consult the NVIDIA product security advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5809 for patched versions specific to each release train. Exact fixed version numbers per train are not independently confirmed from the available intelligence - patch availability is confirmed per vendor advisory, but released patched version numbers should be verified directly against the NVIDIA advisory before upgrade. As compensating controls pending patching: restrict network access to the UFM management interface (including the IBDiagnet API endpoint) to only explicitly trusted administrative hosts using firewall ACLs or VLAN isolation - this directly addresses the AV:A exposure surface and prevents lateral-movement-based exploitation; minimize the number of accounts holding UFM administrative privileges to reduce the credential-compromise attack surface; and enable API access logging to detect anomalous request patterns against the IBDiagnet endpoint. Note that VLAN isolation is a strong mitigant here given the adjacency-only attack vector, but it does not protect against insider threats or already-compromised admin accounts.

Affected VersionsENISA

Unified Fabric Manager Enterprise - LTS 2023 All LTS versions prior to 6.15.17
Unified Fabric Manager Enterprise - GA All GA versions prior to 6.24.1-5
Unified Fabric Manager Enterprise - LTS 2025 All LTS versions prior to 6.23.20-3
Unified Fabric Manager Enterprise - LTS 2024 All LTS versions prior to 6.19.15

Affected Packages

euvd unified_fabric_manager_enterprise_ga_all_ga_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd unified_fabric_manager_enterprise_lts_2023_all_lts_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd unified_fabric_manager_enterprise_lts_2024_all_lts_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd unified_fabric_manager_enterprise_lts_2025_all_lts_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 4 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

NVIDIA Unified Fabric Manager (UFM) Enterprise is a management platform for InfiniBand high-performance fabric infrastructure, commonly deployed in HPC and AI/ML cluster environments. The IBDiagnet API is a diagnostic interface within UFM used for fabric inspection and troubleshooting. The root cause is CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command), meaning user-supplied API request parameters are passed to a system shell or command interpreter without adequate sanitization, allowing injection of arbitrary shell metacharacters or command separators. The CVSS AV:A (Adjacent Network) vector indicates the UFM management interface is reachable only from the local network segment or VLAN, not the open internet. All four CPE-confirmed product lines (GA, LTS 2023, LTS 2024, LTS 2025) share the vulnerable IBDiagnet code path.

Know when Unified Fabric Manager Enterprise Ga gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.8 MEDIUM

Adjacent vector and high privilege requirement match admin-authenticated API access on a segmented management network; full C/I/A impact reflects arbitrary command execution potential with no scope change to other systems.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA UFM Enterprise contains a vulnerability in the IBDiagnet API where an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges may cause command injection by sending crafted API requests. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to code execution, escalation of privileges and information disclosure.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
2.8%
Top 15% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche InfiniBand fabric management product, HPC and AI cluster deployments only
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 2.8%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +3
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy