Skip to main content

Cisco Secure Email CVE-2026-20355

| EUVDEUVD-2026-70211 MEDIUM
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity (CWE-345)
2026-09-02 cisco GHSA-4rjc-g85j-x387
5.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: cisco
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Achieve MITM position between email gateways
  2. Delivery
    Intercept S/MIME-encrypted SMTP session
  3. Exploit
    Iteratively modify ciphertext exploiting integrity validation flaw
  4. Execution
    Use gateway decryption responses as oracle
  5. Impact
    Recover email plaintext

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Data authenticity verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to achieve a machine-in-the-middle network position between email gateways - specifically, the ability to intercept and modify SMTP traffic carrying S/MIME-encrypted messages in transit. The Cisco Secure Email gateway must have S/MIME decryption enabled and actively in use; organizations not using gateway-level S/MIME decryption are not affected. No authentication is required (PR:N per CVSS), but the MITM positioning requirement (AC:H) limits exploitation to attackers with meaningful network access or routing influence. Exploitation is further constrained by the need to conduct an iterative oracle interaction, which may be detectable through anomalous bounce or error traffic patterns. Client-to-client S/MIME implementations that do not route through Cisco Secure Email are not affected.

Impact

The CVSS 5.9 score (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) reflects two competing signals: the confidentiality impact is high (full plaintext recovery), but the attack complexity is high because the attacker must achieve a machine-in-the-middle position between email gateways - a prerequisite that is non-trivial but achievable via BGP hijacking, DNS poisoning, or compromise of a transit network. For organizations whose email traffic traverses untrusted networks or cloud relay infrastructure, the realistic risk is elevated. No EPSS data was provided; no KEV listing exists; no POC has been identified. The scope of impact is bounded (S:U) - exploitation affects confidentiality of email content passing through the gateway, with no integrity or availability impact noted. For enterprises handling sensitive communications (legal, financial, healthcare), the potential data exposure warrants urgent patching despite the moderate overall CVSS score.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with BGP or DNS hijacking capability, or with access to a transit network segment between two organizations' email gateways, intercepts an S/MIME-encrypted SMTP session. The attacker iteratively modifies ciphertext blocks and forwards the manipulated messages to the decrypting Cisco Secure Email gateway, using differential responses (bounce messages, error codes, or timing) as an oracle to recover the plaintext byte-by-byte, revealing the content of encrypted email that was assumed to be confidential.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 02, 2026

Plaintext recovery from S/MIME-encrypted email is possible in Cisco Secure Email due to insufficient message integrity validation during decryption. An unauthenticated remote attacker positioned as a machine-in-the-middle between email gateways can intercept and manipulate ciphertext, exploiting the CWE-345 flaw to extract plaintext content from messages that senders believed were encrypted end-to-end. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, and the AC:H vector reflects the non-trivial MITM positioning requirement.

RemediationAI

Consult the Cisco Security Advisory at https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-esa-smime-disc-dzw4rEdY for patched releases and upgrade instructions - specific fixed version numbers are not confirmed from the provided data and should not be assumed. While awaiting a patch, organizations can enforce mutual TLS between email gateways to reduce MITM interception opportunities on transit paths, though this does not address the underlying decryption flaw. Disabling gateway-level S/MIME decryption eliminates the attack surface entirely but prevents the gateway from processing encrypted email, which may be operationally unacceptable. Network segmentation of gateway-to-gateway SMTP traffic into controlled, monitored network segments can reduce exposure to opportunistic MITM attacks.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco Secure Email 16.0.4-016
Cisco Secure Email 13.5.1-277
Cisco Secure Email 14.3.0-032
Cisco Secure Email 14.0.0-698
Cisco Secure Email 13.0.5-007
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.3-022
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.0-048
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.0-050
Cisco Secure Email 16.5.0-780
Cisco Secure Email 14.2.1-020
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.1-030
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.2-112
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.2-018
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.0-054
Cisco Secure Email 13.5.4-038
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.3-044
Cisco Secure Email 14.2.0-620
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.3-002
Cisco Secure Email 13.0.0-392
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.5-016
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.0-104
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.4-012
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.1-055
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.1-017

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_secure_email no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

S/MIME (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) provides cryptographic signing and encryption for MIME-formatted email, commonly implemented at the email gateway layer for enterprise mail flows. Cisco Secure Email (formerly Cisco Email Security Appliance) performs gateway-level S/MIME decryption, meaning encrypted messages are decrypted before delivery to internal mail servers. CWE-345 (Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity) indicates the implementation fails to adequately validate ciphertext integrity before or during decryption - a class of flaw that enables attacks such as padding oracle exploitation, CBC malleability abuse, or EFAIL-style adaptive chosen-ciphertext attacks. The wildcard CPE cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_secure_email:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all versions of the product.

Know when Cisco Secure Email gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY 5.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

MITM network positioning is required (AC:H, AV:N); no auth or user interaction needed; only confidentiality is impacted, not integrity or availability.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisco

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Multiple vulnerabilities in the Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) decryption functionality of Cisco Secure Email could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to recover plain text from encrypted email messages.

These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of message integrity. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by using a machine-in-the-middle technique to intercept and modify traffic between email gateways. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain plaintext content from the encrypted communication.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise email security gateway
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy