Skip to main content

Cisco Secure Email CVE-2026-76461

| EUVDEUVD-2026-77625 CRITICAL
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-09-14 cisco GHSA-jwpf-jww6-h6vr
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: cisco
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Send crafted email to gateway
  2. Delivery
    Malicious SQL parsed by email logic
  3. Exploit
    SQL injection bypasses validation
  4. Execution
    Escalate to OS command execution
  5. Impact
    Run arbitrary commands as root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation of Cisco Secure Email Gateway (AsyncOS) simply by sending a crafted email message containing malicious SQL through the affected device, which processes inbound mail by default. The only precondition is that the appliance is in the mail-processing path (its normal deployment role), so essentially any internet-facing or mail-receiving ESA running an affected AsyncOS build is exposed. No authentication, no user interaction, and no non-default feature toggle are required per the CVSS vector and description; the limiting factor is version - only the enumerated AsyncOS builds are affected.

Impact

This is a genuine top-priority vulnerability, not an inflated high-CVSS artifact. Multiple independent signals converge: CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H) describes remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity exploitation with total impact; CISA KEV lists it as actively exploited in the wild; and public exploit code is reported available. EPSS is 2.16% (81st percentile) - modest in absolute terms but well above baseline, and EPSS lags behind confirmed KEV exploitation, so the KEV listing is the dominant signal here. SSVC returns Automatable:yes and Technical Impact:total, both consistent with wormable-style unauthenticated RCE. One internal conflict: the SSVC 'Exploitation: none' value directly contradicts the CISA KEV 'actively exploited' status in the same intelligence set - the KEV determination should be treated as authoritative, and the SSVC exploitation field appears stale/miscoded. The CVSS vector is fully consistent with the description (crafted email → SQL injection → root command execution), so no vector-vs-description mismatch exists. Bottom line: treat as emergency patch, especially given root-level command execution on a security appliance.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts an email message embedding malicious SQL statements and sends it through an affected Cisco Secure Email Gateway; the insufficient validation in the email-parsing logic executes the SQL, which escalates into arbitrary command execution as root on the underlying OS - no authentication or user interaction required. Public exploit code is reported available, and CISA confirms active exploitation in the wild. Because the appliance sits in the mail path and processes attacker-supplied mail by design, the attack surface is exposed by normal operation.

Emergency Immediate action required. Why: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited), no patch available.
Exploited in the wild (CISA KEV) No patch listed yet 2.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Unauthenticated remote command execution with root privileges affects Cisco Secure Email Gateway running affected AsyncOS builds (13.x, 14.x, 15.x and 16.x), where crafted inbound email can inject SQL into the mail-parsing pipeline and ultimately achieve OS-level code execution. Exploitation requires no authentication, no user interaction, and no non-default configuration per the assessed CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), so any internet-facing or mail-receiving appliance - the product's normal deployment role - is exposed. This is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) with publicly available exploit code exists, and while EPSS is a moderate 2.16% (81st percentile), the KEV listing and total technical impact per SSVC make this a genuine top-priority issue rather than an inflated high-CVSS artifact.

RemediationAI

Treat this as an emergency patch: apply the fixed AsyncOS builds published in Cisco's advisory at https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX (the available input data does not enumerate a specific fixed version number, so the advisory must be consulted rather than relying on an inferred release). Because confirmed active exploitation is recorded in CISA KEV and publicly available exploit code exists, unpatched appliances should be prioritized ahead of normal maintenance, and patched appliances should be verified against the advisory's fixed-build list covering the 13.x, 14.x, 15.x and 16.x trains. Where immediate upgrade is impossible, compensating controls are inherently limited because the vulnerable code path is the inbound mail-processing role itself: place an intermediate SMTP gateway or mail-filtering layer in front of the ESA that can quarantine or reject messages containing SQL-like payloads and anomalous MIME/header structures before they reach AsyncOS, accepting added latency and the need to harden the intermediate relay as the trade-off; restrict management, CLI and API access to trusted administrative networks so an operator cannot chain this with a separate foothold; segment the ESA so that outbound connections from the appliance to internal database or management hosts are denied, which limits post-exploitation reach but does not prevent the initial root execution; and add process-monitoring alerts for unexpected child processes or file writes under the AsyncOS OS layer to catch exploitation attempts, since the SQL injection path is otherwise silent at the SMTP layer.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco Secure Email 13.5.1-277
Cisco Secure Email 13.0.5-007
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.1-030
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.0-048
Cisco Secure Email 14.0.0-698
Cisco Secure Email 13.0.0-392
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.3-002
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.3-044
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.1-055
Cisco Secure Email 13.5.4-038
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.4-012
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.0-050
Cisco Secure Email 14.2.1-020
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.3-022
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.0-104
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.2-018
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.4-016
Cisco Secure Email 14.2.0-620
Cisco Secure Email 14.3.0-032
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.5-016
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.2-112
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.0-054
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.1-017

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_secure_email no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-89, improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command, occurring inside the email parsing logic of Cisco AsyncOS on Secure Email Gateway. Mail arriving at the appliance is parsed and passed into backend processing that constructs SQL statements without adequate validation; a crafted message containing malicious SQL statements therefore reaches a database layer that runs with root privileges on the underlying operating system, turning a mail-borne SQL injection into full command execution. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_secure_email:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* carries a wildcard version, meaning the vulnerability is tracked at the product level rather than pinned to a single release, and EUVD enumerates the specific impacted AsyncOS builds across the 13.0, 13.5, 14.0, 14.2, 14.3, 15.0, 15.5 and 16.0 trains. Because the injection point is the normal inbound mail path, the attack surface is the SMTP listener itself rather than a management interface, which is why the CVSS vector rates confidentiality, integrity and availability all High with no privileges or interaction required.

Know when Cisco Secure Email gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Unauthenticated remote attacker delivers a crafted email requiring no interaction, and SQL injection yields root command execution, giving full C/I/A - the vendor 9.8 is well-calibrated.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisco

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Added to CISA KEV
Sep 14, 2026 - 19:48 CISA
CVE Published
Sep 14, 2026 - 16:09 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.8

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability in the email parsing of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation in the email parsing logic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email message that contains malicious SQL statements through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL statements, leading to command execution with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

Technical POC Analysis

Bug class: SQL injection (CWE-89), per both the CISA KEV entry and NVD.

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Cisco Secure Email Gateway appliances running AsyncOS 13.x through 16.x are exposed to unauthenticated remote root compromise through their normal inbound mail handling role. Because the product is typically internet-facing and central to email security, a successful attack can give adversaries full control of the gateway, enabling mail data theft, mail flow manipulation, and downstream lateral movement. This vulnerability is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) and no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, making it a top organizational priority.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include isolating or segmenting affected Cisco Secure Email Gateway appliances, restricting inbound mail paths and management access, enabling enhanced logging and monitoring/IDS/IPS virtual patching where supported, and following Cisco advisory workarounds; apply vendor patch when released.

Threat Model

4 threats: Elevation of Privilege, Tampering, Information Disclosure and 1 more

5-step attack chain with trust boundaries and controls

Full threat model - attack chain, trust boundaries, controls per stage and evidence - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Threat Score
5.0/10
Composite threat intelligence
EPSS Score
2.2%
Top 19% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Cisco Secure Email Gateway is a widely deployed enterprise email-security appliance
Threat Intel
2
1 sources
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
135
Sightings
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV Yes
Public POC Yes
EPSS 2.2%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited), no patch available
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

126
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: +50
EPSS: +2
CVSS: +49
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy