Skip to main content

Cisco Secure Email CVE-2026-20354

| EUVDEUVD-2026-70210 MEDIUM
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value (CWE-354)
2026-09-02 cisco GHSA-x26v-65cq-x3px
5.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: cisco
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Achieve MITM position between email gateways
  2. Delivery
    Intercept S/MIME-encrypted message in transit
  3. Exploit
    Modify message to exploit integrity validation gap
  4. Execution
    Relay tampered message to recipient Cisco Secure Email gateway
  5. Persist
    Recipient gateway decrypts modified message
  6. Impact
    Attacker recovers plaintext email content

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integrity verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two specific conditions to be met simultaneously: first, the attacker must achieve a machine-in-the-middle network position between two Cisco Secure Email gateway hosts exchanging S/MIME-encrypted messages - this cannot be done remotely from an arbitrary internet vantage point and requires control of an intermediate network path via BGP hijacking, ARP poisoning, a compromised transit relay, or similar technique. Second, S/MIME decryption must be actively configured and in use on the Cisco Secure Email deployment; organizations not using S/MIME encryption are entirely unaffected. Once positioned, no authentication, user interaction, or privileged access to the target systems is required. The CVSS AC:H metric directly reflects the network-positioning prerequisite, which substantially limits opportunistic exploitation to targeted, resource-capable threat actors.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.9 (Medium) is calibrated appropriately given the AC:H constraint - exploitation demands a machine-in-the-middle network position between email gateways, which is a non-trivial prerequisite not achievable through simple remote access. Despite PR:N and no user interaction required once positioned, the attacker must first compromise a network path (via BGP hijacking, compromised routing infrastructure, or a shared network segment). No EPSS data is included in the available intelligence, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV. No public exploit has been identified. That said, the C:H rating is significant: for organizations actively using S/MIME to protect sensitive communications - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in kalisz handling encrypted legal or financial correspondence - this is a high-priority remediation because confidentiality impact is total once the MITM position is achieved. The vulnerability is less relevant for organizations that do not deploy S/MIME encryption at the gateway level. Overall, real-world risk is targeted rather than mass-exploitation in character.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has achieved a network-level interception position - for example via BGP route injection or a compromised transit relay - intercepts an S/MIME-encrypted message in transit between two Cisco Secure Email gateways. The attacker modifies the encrypted message structure in a way that exploits the integrity validation gap, then allows the modified message to continue to the recipient gateway for decryption. The decryption process, lacking sufficient integrity validation, processes the tampered message and the attacker recovers the plaintext email content. No public proof-of-concept is identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 02, 2026

Plaintext recovery from S/MIME-encrypted email is possible in Cisco Secure Email due to insufficient validation of message integrity during decryption. An unauthenticated remote attacker who achieves a machine-in-the-middle position between email gateways can intercept and manipulate encrypted messages in transit, causing the decryption process to yield recoverable plaintext. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, but confidentiality impact is rated High given complete plaintext disclosure.

RemediationAI

Administrators should consult Cisco Security Advisory cisco-sa-esa-smime-disc-dzw4rEdY at https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-esa-smime-disc-dzw4rEdY for the official fixed release version, as no specific patched version number is available in the current data. As a compensating control pending patch application, organizations should enforce authenticated TLS with strict certificate validation for all SMTP gateway-to-gateway communication paths, which denies the attacker the MITM position required for exploitation; the trade-off is potential delivery failures with non-TLS-capable or miscertified senders. Additionally, consider moving S/MIME decryption entirely to endpoint clients rather than performing it at the gateway, which removes the gateway interception surface entirely but requires end-user key management. Restricting which SMTP relay paths are trusted and auditing gateway-to-gateway transport security configurations are high-value near-term actions.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco Secure Email 16.0.2-112
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.3-002
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.2-018
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.0-104
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.1-055
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.4-012
Cisco Secure Email 14.0.0-698
Cisco Secure Email 13.5.4-038
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.0-054
Cisco Secure Email 13.5.1-277
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.5-016
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.3-044
Cisco Secure Email 16.5.0-780
Cisco Secure Email 14.3.0-032
Cisco Secure Email 13.0.0-392
Cisco Secure Email 13.0.5-007
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.0-048
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.0-050
Cisco Secure Email 15.0.1-030
Cisco Secure Email 14.2.0-620
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.1-017
Cisco Secure Email 14.2.1-020
Cisco Secure Email 15.5.3-022
Cisco Secure Email 16.0.4-016

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_secure_email no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Cisco Secure Email (formerly the Cisco Email Security Appliance) implements S/MIME (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) for gateway-level email encryption and decryption per RFC 5751. CWE-354 (Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value) describes the root cause: the software fails to verify that the integrity of the encrypted message structure has not been altered before attempting decryption, which enables tampering-based plaintext-recovery attacks analogous to EFAIL-class vulnerabilities documented against S/MIME implementations. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_secure_email:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) uses a wildcard version range, indicating Cisco has not yet published granular version bounds in the available data. The vulnerability class is well-understood: improper integrity checks on ciphertext or MIME structure allow a MITM attacker to construct a modified message that, upon decryption, leaks plaintext through a side channel or direct oracle.

Know when Cisco Secure Email gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY 5.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

AC:H reflects mandatory MITM network positioning; C:H captures full plaintext email recovery; no integrity or availability impact applies.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisco

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Multiple vulnerabilities in the Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) decryption functionality of Cisco Secure Email could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to recover plain text from encrypted email messages.

These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of message integrity. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by using a machine-in-the-middle technique to intercept and modify traffic between email gateways. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain plaintext content from the encrypted communication.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise email security gateway across large organizations
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy