Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach exposed AIX/VIOS service over network
-
DeliverySend crafted oversized request
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds write (buffer overflow)
-
ExecutionCorrupt memory and hijack control flow
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code on host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), no special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation with no user interaction against IBM AIX 7.2/7.3 or PowerVM VIOS 4.1. The description does not name a required feature, protocol, or non-default configuration, so the vulnerable network service is assumed reachable in affected default deployments; this cannot be narrowed further from the available data. Practical limiting factors: the attacker must have network access to the specific (undisclosed) vulnerable service port, and AIX/VIOS are predominantly deployed on internal/management networks rather than the public internet, which constrains realistic reach; exploitation is also bounded to the listed versions (AIX 7.2, 7.3; VIOS 4.1). |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 9.8) describes a worst-case profile: network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, with full CIA impact - the kind of pre-auth RCE that warrants urgent patching where the product is exposed. Countervailing signals temper the raw score: there is no EPSS value provided, the CVE is not in CISA KEV (no confirmed active exploitation), and no public POC is identified, so this is currently a high-severity-but-unproven-exploitation issue rather than a demonstrably weaponized one. An SSVC assessment cannot be completed because exploitation status, automatability, and technical-impact inputs beyond CVSS are not supplied. Note also that AIX/VIOS are typically deployed on internal enterprise networks rather than internet-facing, which materially reduces real-world reachability versus what AV:N alone implies - verify network exposure of management/service ports before ranking. The single sparse IBM description offers no detail on the affected service, so the AC:L assessment for a buffer overflow should be treated as vendor-assigned rather than independently corroborated. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network reachability to an exposed AIX or VIOS service sends a crafted request whose oversized/malformed payload overflows a fixed-size buffer, writing past its bounds and corrupting memory to hijack control flow. Because no authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N), a single successful request could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the vulnerable service, potentially the system's most privileged context. No public POC is identified at time of analysis, so this scenario is inferred from the CVSS vector and CWE-787 class rather than a demonstrated exploit. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 20, 2026
Remote code execution in IBM AIX 7.2/7.3 and PowerVM VIOS 4.1 stems from a buffer overflow (out-of-bounds write) that a remote attacker can trigger without authentication or user interaction, yielding full compromise of the affected system. IBM PSIRT rates it CVSS 9.8, reflecting complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the IBM-provided fixes (iFix/APAR filesets) documented at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283858 for AIX 7.2, AIX 7.3, and VIOS 4.1 - the input does not include an exact fix fileset/version, so pull the precise patched level directly from that bulletin. Because the specific vulnerable service is not disclosed, targeted feature-level workarounds cannot be named with confidence; as compensating controls until patching, restrict network access to the affected hosts using firewall/IP-filter rules so only trusted management subnets can reach AIX/VIOS service and administrative ports, place VIOS management interfaces on an isolated management VLAN, and disable or block any non-essential network daemons on the affected systems. The trade-off of aggressive port filtering is potential disruption to legitimate management, HMC, or virtualization traffic, so validate required flows before applying restrictions.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM AIX is IBM's proprietary UNIX operating system for POWER-architecture servers, and the Virtual I/O Server (VIOS) is the PowerVM appliance that virtualizes storage and network resources for LPARs on the same POWER hardware; VIOS is itself built on an AIX foundation, which is why an AIX memory-corruption flaw commonly extends to VIOS. The root cause is classified as CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write): a buffer overflow in which attacker-influenced data is written past the bounds of an allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory. When such corruption is reachable over the network and controls program flow, it can be leveraged into arbitrary code execution. The advisory does not name the specific service, daemon, or protocol parser containing the flawed buffer, so the exact vulnerable component cannot be pinned down from available data.
Know when Aix gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vendor describes remote unauthenticated buffer-overflow RCE with no interaction; sparse detail means AC:L and full C/I/A impact are adopted from IBM's assessment.
Primary rating from Vendor (us).
CVSS VectorVendor: us
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
Executive ViewAI
IBM AIX 7.2/7.3 and PowerVM VIOS 4.1 are vulnerable to critical unauthenticated remote code execution (CVSS 9.8) that allows complete system compromise without user interaction; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Any organization operating these operating systems faces immediate and urgent risk of full infrastructure compromise, including data exfiltration and operational failure. Without an available vendor patch, this vulnerability demands immediate containment and monitoring measures.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: implementing strict network-level access controls to restrict unauthenticated remote connections to affected systems, isolating affected systems from untrusted and internet-facing networks where operationally feasible, enabling enhanced logging and monitoring to detect exploitation attempts, and maintaining contingency plans for system migration or failover if compromise is detected.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which mak
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the InfiniBand subsystem in IBM AIX 6.1 and 7.1, and VIOS 2.2.2.2-FP-26 SP-02, a
IBM AIX 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and VIOS 3.1 could allow a non-privileged local user to exploit a vulnerability in the invscout c
IBM AIX contains an unspecified vulnerability that would allow a locally authenticated user to obtain root level privile
IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, 7.1, and 7.2 contains an unspecified vulnerability that would allow a locally authenticated user to ob
IBM AIX 6.1, 7.1, and 7.2 could allow a local user to gain root privileges using a specially crafted command within the
lquerylv in cmdlvm in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted DBGCM
libodm.a in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporar
libodm.a in IBM AIX 6.1 and 7.1, and VIOS 2.2.x, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on
OS command injection in IBM AIX 7.2 and 7.3 and PowerVM VIOS 4.1 lets a remote, low-privileged authenticated attacker ru
OS command injection in IBM AIX 7.2 and 7.3 and in IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 lets a remote, authenticated attacker execute ar
OS command injection in IBM AIX 7.2/7.3 and PowerVM VIOS 4.1 lets a remote authenticated attacker run arbitrary commands
EUVD-2026-63715
GHSA-2p49-qvr9-pw9j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB