Skip to main content

IBM AIX CVE-2026-18835

| EUVDEUVD-2026-63748 CRITICAL
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-08-20 psirt@us.ibm.com GHSA-h8rg-pqwg-8qvq
9.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: us
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege authenticated access
  2. Delivery
    Reach vulnerable AIX/VIOS command interface
  3. Exploit
    Inject OS command metacharacters (CWE-78)
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary commands on host
  5. Impact
    Scope change to full OS compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold valid low-privilege credentials and network reachability to the affected AIX or VIOS management/command interface (CVSS PR:L, AV:N, AC:L, UI:N). The concrete prerequisite is authenticated access to the component that improperly neutralizes OS-command special elements on AIX 7.2/7.3 or VIOS 4.1; the specific feature, daemon, or CLI is not named in the advisory data provided. Limiting factors: the authentication requirement blocks fully unauthenticated attackers, and exploitation is confined to the affected AIX/VIOS versions on IBM POWER hardware, so environments that isolate management interfaces or restrict account provisioning materially reduce exposure.

Impact

The signals are largely aligned toward high priority: the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C, all impacts High) yields a 9.9 base score driven by network reach, low attack complexity, only low privileges required, no user interaction, and a scope change into the full OS. That said, PR:L means an attacker must first hold a valid (even unprivileged) account, which is a meaningful gate against fully anonymous internet-wide exploitation and argues for targeted rather than mass exploitation. Counterbalancing the high CVSS: there is no EPSS score, no POC, and no KEV listing in the provided data, so real-world exploitation probability is unquantified and currently unproven. This is a genuine high-severity issue warranting prompt patching on management/administrative planes, but the near-term likelihood of opportunistic mass exploitation is unconfirmed given the authentication requirement and absence of public exploit code.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained a low-privilege authenticated session on an exposed AIX 7.2/7.3 host or a VIOS 4.1 management interface submits input containing shell metacharacters to the vulnerable command-processing function. Because the input is not neutralized, the injected commands execute on the underlying OS, and the CVSS scope change indicates the attacker can move beyond the original component to compromise the full host. No public POC is currently identified, so exploitation would require the attacker to independently identify the vulnerable sink.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 20, 2026

OS command injection in IBM AIX 7.2 and 7.3 and PowerVM VIOS 4.1 lets a remote, low-privileged authenticated attacker run arbitrary operating-system commands due to improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-78). IBM PSIRT rates it CVSS 9.9 with a scope change, reflecting that an authenticated foothold can be escalated into full host compromise across the confidentiality, integrity, and availability dimensions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so the current threat is potential rather than confirmed in-the-wild activity.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the fixes IBM publishes in Support document https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283858 for AIX 7.2, AIX 7.3, and VIOS 4.1 (IBM typically ships these as APARs/iFixes tied to specific technology levels and service packs - install the iFix matching your installed TL/SP). No exact fixed version string is provided in the input data, so confirm the precise iFix/APAR from that advisory before deployment. As compensating controls until patching, restrict network access to AIX and VIOS administrative and management interfaces to a dedicated management VLAN or jump-host, enforce least privilege so that low-privilege accounts cannot reach the affected component, rotate and tighten credentials for any accounts that can authenticate to the affected service, and increase logging/monitoring on the management plane to detect anomalous command execution; the trade-off is that network segmentation and access restriction on VIOS may complicate legitimate remote administration and automation workflows.

Affected VersionsENISA

AIX 7.3
PowerVM VIOS 4.1
AIX 7.2

Affected Packages

euvd aix no fix
euvd powervm_vios no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

AIX is IBM's proprietary Unix operating system for POWER-architecture servers, and VIOS (Virtual I/O Server) is the PowerVM appliance that virtualizes storage and network I/O for LPARs on those same systems. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command, i.e. OS command injection): a privileged component or management interface passes attacker-influenced input into a shell or system call without sanitizing metacharacters, allowing command boundaries to be broken. Because VIOS underpins the virtualization layer for potentially many guest partitions, a flaw at this level has amplified blast radius beyond a single OS instance. The advisory does not disclose the exact vulnerable command, daemon, or CLI, so the specific injection sink is not publicly detailed.

Know when Aix gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (us) PRIMARY 9.9 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Remote authenticated low-privilege OS command injection with no user interaction gives PR:L/AV:N/AC:L; command execution escapes the component into the host, so S:C with full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (us).

CVSS VectorVendor: us

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Organizations deploying IBM AIX 7.2-7.3 or PowerVM VIOS 4.1 face critical risk from CVE-2026-18835, a command injection vulnerability allowing authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands and achieve full host compromise. This affects IT operations, virtualization platforms, and backup infrastructure across the enterprise. With no vendor patch currently available, immediate action is required to restrict access and implement detection capabilities.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: (1) enforce principle of least privilege and multi-factor authentication for all authenticated access to affected systems; (2) implement comprehensive command execution logging and real-time alerting for suspicious patterns; (3) apply network segmentation to limit lateral movement in case of compromise; (4) disable remote access protocols where operationally feasible and use out-of-band administration methods; (5) increase log review cadence to continuous monitoring for exploitation indicators.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 47% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise IBM POWER Unix/virtualization OS, common in datacenters but not ubiquitous
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

51
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

More in Aix

View all
CVE-2014-3566 LOW POC
3.4 Oct 15

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which mak

CVE-2013-4011 HIGH POC
7.2 Jul 18

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the InfiniBand subsystem in IBM AIX 6.1 and 7.1, and VIOS 2.2.2.2-FP-26 SP-02, a

CVE-2023-28528 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 28

IBM AIX 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and VIOS 3.1 could allow a non-privileged local user to exploit a vulnerability in the invscout c

CVE-2016-3053 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 01

IBM AIX contains an unspecified vulnerability that would allow a locally authenticated user to obtain root level privile

CVE-2016-6079 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 15

IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, 7.1, and 7.2 contains an unspecified vulnerability that would allow a locally authenticated user to ob

CVE-2016-8972 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 15

IBM AIX 6.1, 7.1, and 7.2 could allow a local user to gain root privileges using a specially crafted command within the

CVE-2014-8904 HIGH POC
7.2 Jan 15

lquerylv in cmdlvm in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted DBGCM

CVE-2012-2179 MEDIUM POC
6.9 Jun 22

libodm.a in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporar

CVE-2014-3977 MEDIUM POC
6.9 Jun 08

libodm.a in IBM AIX 6.1 and 7.1, and VIOS 2.2.x, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on

CVE-2026-16816 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 19

OS command injection in IBM AIX 7.2 and 7.3 and in IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 lets a remote, authenticated attacker execute ar

CVE-2026-15068 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 19

OS command injection in IBM AIX 7.2/7.3 and PowerVM VIOS 4.1 lets a remote authenticated attacker run arbitrary commands

CVE-2024-56346 CRITICAL
10.0 Mar 18

IBM AIX 7.2 and 7.3 nimesis NIM master service could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improp

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy