Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privilege account
  2. Exploit
    Craft PAM request with zero-length auth token
  3. Execution
    Send to SSSD responder socket
  4. Impact
    Trigger out-of-bounds read crashing PAM responder (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an existing local, low-privilege account on a host where SSSD handles PAM authentication (PR:L, AV:L) and the ability to send a PAM request to the SSSD responder socket; the trigger is specifically a PAM request containing a zero-length authentication token, which the responder fails to length-validate. No non-default configuration is needed beyond SSSD being used for PAM/authentication (its standard role on domain-joined RHEL/OpenShift systems). Limiting factors: the attack is local-only (not remotely reachable), requires prior authenticated access, needs no user interaction, and yields only a responder crash (availability) rather than privilege escalation, code execution, or data disclosure.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity local Denial of Service, not a top-priority emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 5.5) is internally consistent with the description: a local, already-authenticated low-privilege user (PR:L) triggers an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) that crashes the SSSD PAM responder, yielding availability-only impact (A:H; C:N/I:N). No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The practical ceiling on risk is the local-only attack vector and the DoS-only outcome - an attacker must already have a local account, and the payoff is a crash of the authentication responder rather than code execution or data theft. Note a signal conflict: the input Tags include 'Information Disclosure' and 'Buffer Overflow', but the vendor CVSS sets C:N and the root cause is an out-of-bounds READ causing a crash, not a write/overflow or confirmed data leak - the tags overstate the impact relative to the authoritative CVSS and description. The real-world significance is that a crashed PAM responder can block authentication for legitimate users on a domain-joined host, so on shared multi-user systems this is a meaningful availability concern despite the modest score.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local user with a shell on a RHEL/OpenShift host running SSSD connects to the PAM responder socket and sends a crafted PAM request carrying a zero-length authentication token. Because the token length is not validated, the responder reads beyond the buffer and crashes, disrupting PAM-based authentication for other users on that host. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the local, low-privilege attack vector means the attacker must already have an account on the target.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

A local, low-privilege attacker can crash the SSSD PAM responder on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (versions 6 through 10) and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 by sending a crafted PAM request that contains a zero-length authentication token. The flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-104042 with a CVSS score of 5.5, stems from missing length validation that leads to an out-of-bounds read and a denial of service; it requires an existing local account and no user interaction. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and this is a moderate-severity local DoS rather than a remote or privilege-escalation issue.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified in the provided intelligence at time of analysis. Administrators should monitor Red Hat advisories (https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-104042) and the Bugzilla ticket (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2478862) for a fixed SSSD package, then update to the patched version as soon as it is released. Until then, compensating controls include limiting local shell access to trusted users, since the attack requires an existing low-privilege account; ensuring SSSD responder sockets are restricted to root and the sssd user only; and monitoring SSSD logs for PAM responder crashes to detect exploitation attempts. Disabling the SSSD PAM responder entirely would break domain authentication on joined systems and is not recommended as a general mitigation. After applying the patch, restart SSSD to ensure the fixed code is loaded.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SSSD (System Security Services Daemon) provides identity and authentication services on Red Hat Enterprise Linux and OpenShift, with a PAM responder handling Pluggable Authentication Module requests over a local socket. The vulnerability is a classic CWE-125 out-of-bounds read: the responder fails to validate the length of an authentication token, so a zero-length token causes it to read beyond buffer boundaries, crashing the process. Affected CPEs include Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, as well as Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) confirms the attack is local, requires low privileges, needs no user interaction, and impacts only availability. Although some tags mention 'Buffer Overflow' and 'Information Disclosure', the assessed impact is limited to a denial of service; no code execution or data leakage is confirmed.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

Local socket reachable only by an authenticated local user gives AV:L/PR:L; reliably triggered single malformed token gives AC:L; crash-only impact gives A:H with C:N/I:N.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 5.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in sssd. A local attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a crafted Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) request containing a zero-length authentication token to the responder socket. Due to missing input validation, the service attempts to read beyond buffer boundaries when processing the token, causing the PAM responder to crash.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
High
SSSD is the default authentication/identity responder on RHEL enterprise Linux
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_openshift_container_platform_4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_openshift_container_platform_4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

CVE-2026-107935 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 09

Unauthenticated path traversal in gvproxy, the network forwarder shipped in the gvisor-tap-vsock package (used by Podman

CVE-2026-28369 CRITICAL
9.1 Mar 27

HTTP request smuggling in Undertow (the embedded web server underpinning JBoss EAP, Red Hat Data Grid, and Apache Camel

CVE-2026-28368 CRITICAL
9.1 Mar 27

HTTP request smuggling in Red Hat Undertow allows remote unauthenticated attackers to bypass front-end security controls

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy