Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain Layer 2 adjacent position on connected segment
-
DeliveryCraft malformed LLDP frames
-
ExploitSend to LLDP-enabled interface
-
ExecutionOverflow stack buffer in l2cpd
-
PersistCrash Layer 2 control-plane daemon
-
ImpactDisrupt LLDP and other L2 protocols device-wide
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The target interface must be explicitly configured for LLDP - an interface without LLDP enabled is not reachable by this vector. The attacker must be Layer 2 adjacent (AV:A): on the same broadcast domain or directly connected to the LLDP-enabled interface, since LLDP is link-local and not routable across L3 boundaries. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N), but the adjacency and LLDP-enabled prerequisites are the primary limiting factors, confining exploitation to attackers who already have local network presence; remote Internet-based exploitation is not possible. |
| Impact | This is a credible operational priority for Juniper-heavy networks, but the real-world risk is bounded by the attack vector rather than severity theater. The vendor CVSS 4.0 vector scores 8.7 (High) with AV:A (adjacent), AC:L, PR:N and UI:N, meaning an unauthenticated attacker on the same Layer 2 segment can trigger it reliably with no interaction - a genuinely low bar for anyone already on the local broadcast domain. However, the impact is a denial of service in the l2cpd daemon, and here the input signals CONFLICT: the vendor vector asserts VC:H/VI:H/VA:H (full confidentiality and integrity loss), yet the description describes only disruption of LLDP and other Layer 2 control-plane protocols - a classic availability-only DoS. The C/I:H claims appear inconsistent with a stack buffer overflow that the vendor characterizes as DoS; verify with Juniper whether code execution is actually achievable before treating this as a confidentiality/integrity breach. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit were provided, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation; the adjacency requirement further argues against opportunistic mass exploitation and toward insider or lateral-movement scenarios. Net: patch promptly on exposed Junos/Junos Evolved devices with LLDP-enabled interfaces, but treat the headline 8.7 as attack-vector-driven, not exploitation-driven. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a foothold on the same Layer 2 segment (e.g., a compromised host or rogue device on a directly connected interface) sends specially crafted LLDP frames to a Junos interface that has LLDP enabled. The malformed packets overflow a stack buffer in the l2cpd daemon, crashing Layer 2 control-plane processing; repeated frames sustain the outage and degrade LLDP and other L2 control protocols across the device. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the adjacency requirement means the attacker must already be on the local network. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
A stack-based buffer overflow in the l2cpd (Layer 2 Control Protocol daemon) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an unauthenticated attacker who is Layer 2 adjacent - on the same broadcast domain or directly cabled to the target interface - crash Layer 2 control-plane processing by sending crafted LLDP packets to an interface with LLDP enabled. The primary outcome is denial of service: repeated triggering can destabilize LLDP and other Layer 2 control protocols on the device, though the assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, ~6.5) rates this as availability-only impact with no confidentiality or integrity loss. Exploitation is gated by two prerequisites - the attacker must already have local Layer 2 presence and the targeted interface must explicitly have LLDP configured - so remote Internet-based attacks are not possible; no public exploit code or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation was identified at time of analysis, and vendor patches are available.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to the fixed Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved build for your train - Junos OS 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, or 26.2R1-S2; Junos OS Evolved 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, or 26.2R1-S2-EVO; consult Juniper advisory JSA112187 (https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187) for the authoritative per-platform fixed-build list before scheduling maintenance. Where immediate upgrade is not feasible, the most direct mitigation is to disable LLDP on all edge or untrusted interfaces (for example, set protocols lldp interface <if> disable or removing LLDP from the interface configuration entirely), which removes the vulnerable parsing path on those ports; the trade-off is loss of neighbor discovery, VoIP/PoE auto-configuration, and topology mapping, so retain LLDP only on hardened uplinks and management links. You can further reduce exposure by hardening Layer 2 access - 802.1X port authentication, MACsec on supported links, port security/MAC limiting, and disabling unused switch ports - which raises the cost of gaining the required Layer 2 adjacency, though it does not eliminate the vector for already-connected hosts. Because l2cpd also serves STP, LACP, and other protocols, disabling LLDP alone stops this specific attack path but does not retire the daemon; monitor logs for repeated l2cpd restarts or LLDP flaps as an exploitation indicator while patching is staged.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is l2cpd, the Junos daemon that handles Layer 2 control-plane protocols such as LLDP, STP, and LACP. The flaw is a classic CWE-121 stack-based buffer overflow: LLDP frames received on an LLDP-enabled interface are parsed into a fixed-size stack buffer inside l2cpd without adequate length validation of the offending field/TLV, so an oversized or malformed LLDP packet overwrites adjacent stack memory. Because LLDP is a link-local protocol that is neither routed nor forwarded across Layer 3 boundaries, the attack surface is limited to the local broadcast domain or a direct physical/virtual link to the vulnerable device; the CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/PR:N/UI:N) confirms the adjacent position and absence of authentication, while the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment scores only availability impact (C:N/I:N/A:H), consistent with a daemon crash rather than memory-corruption-driven code execution. CPE data enumerates the affected product families as juniper_networks:junos_os and juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved, i.e., both the FreeBSD-based Junos OS train and the Linux-based Junos OS Evolved train are in scope. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 reflects high availability impact plus additional-scope availability (SA:L) effects from services dependent on the crashed daemon, but the practical risk remains bounded by the physical/L2 adjacency requirement.
Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
Adjacent LLDP trigger with no auth or interaction gives AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N; impact is daemon DoS only, so C:N/I:N/A:H, scope unchanged on same device.
Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).
CVSS VectorVendor: juniper
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the l2cpd daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service in Layer 2 control-plane processing via LLDP packets received on an interface configured for LLDP. Repeated triggering may disrupt LLDP and other Layer 2 control protocols across the device.
Executive ViewAI
Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved devices with LLDP enabled on interfaces are affected by a high-severity stack-based buffer overflow that can be triggered by an unauthenticated, Layer 2-adjacent attacker, leading to a denial of service. Although no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, successful exploitation crashes the l2cpd daemon and can destabilize Layer 2 control protocols, potentially causing network outages or degraded performance for downstream users and services. Patch available per vendor advisory; leadership should prioritize patching to maintain network availability and stability.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u
Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W
Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow
A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices
Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro
Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid
Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas
Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin
Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b
Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno
Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co
Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab
EUVD-2026-101374
GHSA-j797-mpgh-r6v2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB