Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Command runs in a local developer/CI context requiring the tool be invoked (UI:R) with some access to influence input (PR:L, AV:L); successful injection yields full code execution, so C/I/A:H.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
NPM package next-npm-version1.0.1 is vulnerable to Command injection.
AnalysisAI
Code injection in the Node.js npm package next-npm-version 1.0.1 (published by afeiship/@jswork) allows attacker-controlled input to be passed into a shell execution context, achieving arbitrary command execution (CWE-94). A proof-of-concept exists in a public gist, though there is no evidence of active exploitation; the EPSS probability is very low (0.03%, 10th percentile) and CISA SSVC rates exploitation as 'none' but automatable with total technical impact. The NVD CVSS of 9.8 (AV:N) appears optimistic for a version-bumping developer utility whose command execution is far more plausibly reached via local/library invocation than remote network access.
Technical ContextAI
next-npm-version is a small helper library in the @jswork/afeiship JavaScript ecosystem intended to automate bumping and publishing npm package versions. Such tooling typically shells out to the npm CLI or git using child_process (exec/execSync) with interpolated arguments; when a version string or other parameter is concatenated into that command line without sanitization, shell metacharacters (;, |, `, $()) break out of the intended command - the CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / code injection) root cause here manifesting as OS command injection. The CPE data is unusable (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*) as MITRE recorded the vendor/product as 'n/a', so the affected component is identified only by the package name and the referenced npm/GitHub artifacts.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patched version is identified at time of analysis - the references point to a GitHub issue (github.com/afeiship/next-npm-version/issues/1) and the npm package page rather than a tagged fixed release, so upgrading is not currently an option. As the most effective compensating control, remove the next-npm-version dependency from build and release pipelines (its function, bumping npm versions, is replaceable by 'npm version' directly), which eliminates the injection surface entirely with no security downside. If it must remain, never pass untrusted or externally-influenced strings (branch names, tags, CI variables, user input) into its version/command parameters, and run any release tooling that uses it in an isolated, least-privileged CI runner so that a triggered command cannot reach production credentials or hosts. Monitor the npm advisory (https://www.npmjs.com/package/@jswork/next-npm-version) and NVD (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-63706) for a fixed release.
A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Eval injection vulnerability in the internals.batch function in lib/batch.js in the bassmaster plugin before 1.5.2 for t
Flowise version 3.0.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the CustomMCP node. The mcpServerConfig paramete
Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was inc
An issue was discovered in the node-serialize package 0.0.4 for Node.js. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary fi
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Manage Accounts page in the AccountManagement.asmx service in the Solarwin
The JS-YAML module before 2.0.5 for Node.js parses input without properly considering the unsafe !!js/function tag, whic
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Same weakness CWE-94 – Code Injection
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2025-209724
GHSA-2xx6-qf7x-grqh