XSS
Monthly
Reflected cross-site scripting in the H5P WordPress plugin (versions 1.17.6 and earlier) lets an unauthenticated attacker inject script that executes in a victim's browser when they follow a crafted link, per the CVSS PR:N/UI:R vector. Because the scope is changed (S:C), successful execution can reach beyond the vulnerable component into the authenticated WordPress session context, enabling session/cookie theft or admin-context actions. There is no public exploit identified and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, so risk is moderate (CVSS 7.1) and contingent on social-engineering a logged-in user.
Stored/reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Melapress's WP Activity Log WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.6.3.1, reported by Patchstack) lets a low-privileged Subscriber-level user inject script that executes in another user's browser, with a CVSS-rated scope change (S:C) meaning the payload can affect resources beyond the plugin's own security context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; direct impact is limited (C:L/I:L/A:L) but the cross-context scope and low attack complexity make it relevant for sites that allow open registration.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Email Address Encoder WordPress plugin (free, before 1.0.25) and its Email Encoder Premium counterpart (before 0.3.12) lets unauthenticated visitors inject persistent JavaScript through the plugin's flawed email-replacement handling. Publicly available exploit code exists (disclosed by WPScan) and a vendor patch is available, but it is not in CISA KEV, so there is no public exploit identified as actively used in the wild. Successful exploitation executes attacker script in the browser of any user who later renders the affected page, typically an authenticated administrator.
Authentication bypass via cross-site scripting in Quest NetVault Backup's addclient3 webpage allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script that executes in a victim's authenticated session, bypassing access controls. Disclosed through Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI-26-369, formerly ZDI-CAN-27666), the flaw requires user interaction - the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file - and can be chained with other weaknesses to achieve code execution in the SYSTEM context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, though the high CVSS of 8.8 reflects the serious downstream RCE potential.
Authentication bypass via cross-site scripting in the Quest NetVault Backup viewclient web interface lets remote attackers inject arbitrary script that, when a victim visits a malicious page or opens a malicious file, runs in the application context and circumvents authentication. Disclosed through Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI-26-377, ZDI-CAN-28202), the flaw can be chained with additional vulnerabilities to achieve code execution as SYSTEM. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CVSS 8.8 rating reflects the high impact of the auth-bypass-plus-RCE chain.
Stored cross-site scripting leading to OS command execution in SiYuan, an open-source personal knowledge management system, affects all desktop client versions prior to 3.7.0. Untrusted marketplace package metadata (name, version, author, description) is serialized via JSON.stringify() into a single-quoted data-obj HTML attribute without escaping single quotes or angle brackets, so a package name containing a single quote breaks out of the attribute and injects arbitrary HTML; because the Electron BrowserWindow runs with nodeIntegration:true and contextIsolation:false, the DOM XSS escalates to arbitrary command execution on the host. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-x88j-wgpr-h22x) notes this is the same root cause and impact as a prior advisory, reached through a sibling sink the earlier patch missed.
Arbitrary command execution in the SiYuan Electron desktop client (versions prior to 3.7.0) allows a remote attacker to run OS commands on a victim's machine when they merely view a malicious Bazaar marketplace package's README. The root cause is that Lute's HTML sanitizer fails to strip <iframe> elements, which combine with the Electron client's permissive security settings (e.g. node integration / relaxed sandboxing) to escalate stored XSS into full code execution; notably no package installation is required, only viewing the package details. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 (High) reflects high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan's Attribute View (database) asset cell renderer escalates to remote code execution on the Electron desktop client for all versions prior to 3.7.0. An attacker who can persist crafted content into a database asset cell has malicious JavaScript executed in the privileged Electron context, breaking out to the host operating system; the issue carries a 9.9 CVSS and is fixed in 3.7.0. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan's attribute-view (database) cell renderer, affecting all versions prior to 3.7.0, lets a low-privileged attacker with write access to a synced workspace plant a persistent payload that runs arbitrary JavaScript when a victim opens the block-attribute panel. The genAVValueHTML function interpolates cell content raw in its text, url, phone, and mAsset branches and the Go kernel never escapes the value on input, so the malicious row survives sync byte-for-byte and fires on every device that renders it; on the Electron desktop client (nodeIntegration:true) the XSS escalates to host remote code execution via require('child_process'). CVSS is rated 9.9; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan personal knowledge management system before 3.7.0 allows a third-party Bazaar package author to execute JavaScript in an Administrator's authenticated workspace origin. The lute sanitizer used by renderPackageREADME relies on a stale event-handler blocklist that omits modern DOM event attributes (onpointerover, onpointerdown, onauxclick, onbeforetoggle, onfocusin, onanimationstart, ontransitionend), and the rendered README HTML is injected via innerHTML with no client-side DOMPurify and no CSP/X-Frame-Options/X-Content-Type-Options headers. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but successful exploitation yields full control of the victim's workspace.
Origin-validation bypass in SiYuan Note (open-source personal knowledge management) before 3.7.0 lets any installed Chrome/Chromium browser extension obtain RoleAdministrator access to the local kernel HTTP server at 127.0.0.1:6806. Because the kernel unconditionally trusts all chrome-extension:// origins and desktop installs ship with an empty AccessAuthCode by default, a malicious or supply-chain-compromised extension can issue fully authenticated admin API calls with no further authentication, enabling data exfiltration, stored XSS injection, and configuration tampering. Publicly available exploit code exists; there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan personal knowledge management before 3.7.0 lets an attacker with write access to a synced workspace plant a CSS snippet whose '</style>' sequence breaks out of the surrounding <style> tag when renderSnippet() interpolates it via insertAdjacentHTML, running arbitrary JavaScript in the renderer. On Electron desktop builds the renderer runs with nodeIntegration:true, so the injected handler can reach require('child_process') and escalate the XSS to full host remote code execution. The payload syncs through the workspace repository and fires automatically on every device that pulls, and it bypasses the user's enabledJS=off setting; no public exploit or CISA KEV listing is identified at time of analysis.
Cross-site scripting (JavaScript injection) in Ghost's ActivityPub client (@tryghost/activitypub) prior to version 3.1.0 allows a malicious federated server to embed attacker-controlled script in shared posts that executes in the browser of a victim Ghost user who views the content. The flaw stems from improper sanitization of post content received over ActivityPub federation, enabling session theft or actions performed in the victim's authenticated context. There is no public exploit identified at the time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-site scripting in OpenText Access Manager 5.1 through 5.1.2 lets a remote unauthenticated attacker inject script that executes in the browser of a targeted user of this enterprise SSO/access-management platform (CWE-79). Per the vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector the flaw carries high vulnerable-system confidentiality impact (VC:H) but high attack complexity and a specific attack requirement (AC:H/AT:P), yielding a base score of 8.2. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated stored cross-site scripting in the WP Meta SEO WordPress plugin (versions ≤ 4.5.18 by Joomunited) lets remote attackers persist arbitrary JavaScript into the `wp_wpms_links.link_url` database column by sending HTTP requests with a malicious URI to any 404 path. The payload executes in the browser of any administrator who opens the plugin's '404 & Redirects' admin page, enabling session hijacking or admin-on-behalf actions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; no KEV listing.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Cincopa video and media plug-in for WordPress (versions ≤1.163) allows unauthenticated commenters to inject persistent JavaScript via the [cincopa] shortcode processed by the comment_text filter. Any visitor or administrator viewing the affected post executes the attacker's script in their browser session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Email JavaScript Cloak WordPress plugin (versions ≤1.03) allows authenticated contributors and higher to inject arbitrary JavaScript via unsanitized attributes of the plugin's 'email' shortcode. The payload executes in any visitor's browser that renders the affected page, enabling session theft or site defacement. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the plugin is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the ARForms WordPress plugin (versions ≤7.1.3) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the `value` parameter of the `arf_save_incomplete_form_data` AJAX endpoint, with the payload executing in an administrator's browser when they view the Partial Filled Form Entries dashboard page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Wordfence's disclosure provides enough technical detail to reproduce the injection. Successful exploitation typically leads to admin account takeover and full WordPress site compromise.
Stored cross-site scripting in FlatPress (commits prior to 10be83c) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject persistent HTML and JavaScript via the name, URL, and email fields of comment and contact forms. The payloads execute in any viewer's browser - including administrators reviewing comments in the admin panel - and weak URL scheme validation additionally permits javascript: and data: URI injection. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the patch and a third-party advisory disclose the affected sinks in detail.
Reflected cross-site scripting in Immich (commits 4ffa26c9 through pre-4eb1003) allows a single-click account takeover of any authenticated user by abusing the unvalidated continue query parameter on /auth/login, which is passed directly to SvelteKit's redirect() without scheme or origin checks. The payload executes attacker-controlled JavaScript inside Immich's origin and uses the victim's session to mint an all-permission API key, yielding persistent compromise. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the upstream fix commit and a detailed GHSA advisory describe the flaw clearly enough to derive a working PoC.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Simple Basic Contact Form WordPress plugin (all versions through 20250114) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a visitor's browser when the victim follows a crafted link or submits a cross-site forged form that triggers a validation error. Publicly available exploit details have been published by WPScan, though the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no EPSS data is provided in the input.
Stored cross-site scripting in Gogs (self-hosted Git service) versions through 0.14.2 allows a low-privileged repository user to inject JavaScript via a crafted Jupyter notebook (.ipynb) Markdown cell containing a javascript: scheme link, which executes in the Gogs origin when a victim clicks the rendered link. Although server-side sanitization is performed via /-/api/sanitize_ipynb, the client subsequently re-renders Markdown cells with marked() and regenerates the dangerous links, and the file preview page is served without a Content Security Policy. Publicly available exploit code exists (full PoC published in the GHSA advisory) but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively exploited in the wild.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the federation endpoints of OpenIdentityPlatform OpenAM allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject script into the OpenAM origin by luring a victim to a crafted URL, but only when a non-default clustering configuration (the SAML2 cluster cookie-hash-redirect path handled by FSUtils.postToTarget) is in use. The flaw is an output-encoding inconsistency (CWE-79) in the openam-federation-library package, fixed in version 16.1.1 via upstream commit 2f5e9bf4. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing was identified at time of analysis, and because execution runs in the trusted identity-provider origin, a successful attack can drive authenticated state-changing actions rather than merely steal a low-value session.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the OpenAM OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect authorization endpoint allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject HTML and JavaScript into the `form_post` response page rendered in the OpenAM origin by manipulating the OAuth `state` parameter. The flaw affects the `openam-oauth2` module of org.openidentityplatform.openam from version 13.0.0 up to (but not including) 16.1.1, and is fixed in the 16.1.1 release. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing were identified at time of analysis, but the vulnerable templates are shipped by default and the injection point is a standard, client-controllable OAuth parameter.
Command injection via untrusted Markdown rendering in the Angular Language Service VS Code extension (versions prior to 21.2.4) allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands on a developer's host when the developer hovers over and clicks a crafted JSDoc tooltip. The client trusts all rendered Markdown (isTrusted: true) while the language server fails to sanitize JSDoc content, enabling embedded command: URIs to fire from malicious source files or npm dependencies. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the supply-chain reach via npm packages makes this a notable developer-workstation risk.
Arbitrary code execution in the Angular Language Service VS Code extension prior to 21.2.4 allows attackers to silently run code on a developer's machine simply by having them open a malicious repository in VS Code. The extension reads the typescript.tsdk and js/ts.tsdk.path workspace settings without checking Workspace Trust, then require()s a tsserverlibrary.js file from that attacker-controlled path. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the patch diff in PR #68857 clearly illustrates the exploit primitive.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Transbank Webpay WordPress plugin before 1.14.0 lets unauthenticated visitors inject malicious script into plugin log entries that execute in the browser of any administrator who later views the logs. Because injection requires no authentication and the payload runs in a privileged admin session, it can be used to hijack the WordPress backend; publicly available exploit code exists and a public write-up chains the flaw toward remote code execution. EPSS is low (0.16%, 6th percentile) and CISA SSVC records no observed exploitation, so real-world targeting appears limited despite the high CVSS of 7.1.
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in the Ultimate WooCommerce Auction Pro WordPress plugin (all versions through 2.4.5) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into a page by tricking a logged-in high-privilege user, such as an administrator, into clicking a crafted link. The flaw stems from an unsanitized, unescaped request parameter reflected back into the response, and publicly available exploit code exists (reported by WPScan), though EPSS probability is low (0.15%, 4th percentile) and there is no evidence of active exploitation.
Remote code execution in SiYuan note-taking application (before v3.6.1) allows any malicious Bazaar marketplace package author to compromise users via unsanitized HTML rendering of package displayName, description, and README content. Because the Electron renderer is configured with nodeIntegration:true and contextIsolation:false, injected JavaScript pivots directly to arbitrary OS command execution. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but VulnCheck published a detailed technical advisory documenting both zero-click (metadata) and one-click (README) vectors.
Remote code execution in SiYuan note-taking application before v3.6.1 occurs when users browse the built-in Bazaar marketplace, because package metadata (displayName, description) and README content are rendered without HTML sanitization. Because the Electron shell ships with nodeIntegration:true and contextIsolation:false, an injected script in the renderer executes arbitrary OS commands as the user. Reported by VulnCheck with detailed vulnerable-code analysis published in the GHSA advisory; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the StarCitizenWiki EmbedVideo MediaWiki extension (versions <= 4.0.0) allows any user with page-edit rights to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the data-mw-iframeconfig attribute by supplying a malformed URL or ID containing single quotes for the archiveorg, wistia, or sharepoint services. The flaw is present under the default $wgEmbedVideoRequireConsent=true configuration and executes in the wiki origin for every visitor that loads the affected page, with publicly available exploit code exists in the GHSA advisory.
Cross-window message spoofing in TinaCMS (npm tinacms and @tinacms/app) lets a malicious web page hijack an authenticated editing session because the useTina overlay handler, the OAuth authentication popup handler, and the admin↔preview iframe GraphQL reducer act on window.postMessage event.data without validating event.origin or event.source, and reply with wildcard target origins. An attacker who lures an authenticated Tina editor to a crafted page (or gains an opener/iframe relationship with the Tina admin) can forge messages to drive the editor, inject preview content, or observe and forge the OAuth popup channel to take over the session. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis; a vendor patch is available in PR #7056 and the flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 base score of 7.6.
Stored cross-site scripting in the StarCitizenWiki EmbedVideo MediaWiki extension (versions <= 4.0.0) allows any wiki user to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript into rendered pages by abusing the unsanitized class attribute on embed tags such as <youtube>. Because the user-supplied class is concatenated into an HTML template via sprintf without escaping, an attacker can break out of the class attribute and execute script in the context of every visitor that views the page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the advisory's own PoC, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the EmbedVideo MediaWiki extension allows authenticated wiki editors to inject arbitrary JavaScript by providing a malicious service name in parser tags. An attacker with page edit privileges can embed HTML/JavaScript that executes in the context of any visitor's browser, leading to session hijacking, content defacement, or other client-side attacks. Publicly available exploit code exists, and affected versions <=4.0.0 of the composer package are vulnerable.
Stored cross-site scripting in the jupyterlab-git extension (versions 0.30.0b3 through 0.53.x) escalates to remote code execution when a victim views a rename diff in the Git History tab. The PlainTextDiff.ts createHeader() method injects unsanitized Git filenames into innerHTML, so a filename such as <img src=x onerror=eval(atob(...))>.py fires JavaScript that reads the _xsrf cookie, spawns a JupyterLab terminal via POST /api/terminals, and runs arbitrary shell commands. Reported by AWS Security; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the vendor advisory (GHSA-f962-v9hr-pfg5) documents a detailed reproduction path, and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in pgAdmin 4 versions 6.0 through 9.15 allows a malicious or attacker-influenced PostgreSQL server to inject arbitrary HTML into pgAdmin's interface via ErrorResponse messages and EXPLAIN plan fields rendered through html-react-parser. Because the injection executes inside pgAdmin's own DOM, an attacker can render convincing phishing dialogs or redirect the top-level tab via iframe srcdoc, bypassing standard X-Frame-Options and frame-ancestors protections. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor has shipped a multi-layer fix in 9.16.
DOM-based cross-site scripting in AutoGPT versions prior to 0.6.62 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated victim's browser by tricking them into clicking a crafted signup-page link whose `next` URL parameter is passed unsanitized into `router.push`. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-j2cp-jg5q-38wj) confirms the issue and ships a fix in 0.6.62.
Stored cross-site scripting in Kirby CMS (getkirby/cms) lets an authenticated Panel editor inject markup that survives Dom::sanitize() and executes as JavaScript when content is rendered in the Panel or on the site frontend. The flaw affects the writer and list fields plus the Sane HTML/SVG/XML sanitization API, and versions ≤ 4.9.3 and 5.0.0-alpha.1 through 5.4.3 are vulnerable. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and this is not in CISA KEV, but the vendor rates it high severity because a low-privileged editor can escalate to an admin session.
Cross-site scripting in Kirby CMS's Panel writer field (versions <= 4.9.3 and 5.0.0-alpha.1 through 5.4.3) lets an authenticated user inject a JavaScript-scheme URL into the link or email marks that executes in their own browser session when clicked before the content is saved. In Kirby's default configuration this is limited to self-XSS requiring social engineering, but Panel plugins that embed the <k-writer> component without sanitizing HTML before storage can be escalated to stored XSS affecting other users. There is no public exploit and it is not in CISA KEV; the vendor rates it high severity for affected sites.
Stored cross-site scripting in jupyter_server's nbconvert HTTP handlers allows a malicious notebook to execute JavaScript in the Jupyter origin, leading to session token theft, full /api/* control, and kernel remote code execution. The NbconvertFileHandler and NbconvertPostHandler render notebook-authored HTML without a CSP sandbox directive, and combined with HTMLExporter's non-sanitizing default, any display_data HTML payload runs with the victim's authority. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.3 and a vendor patch is available in v2.20.0.
Authentication bypass in Zitadel identity platform (versions 3.0.0-3.4.11 and 4.0.0-4.15.1) allows an attacker who has obtained a victim's authorization code, refresh token, or device authorization grant to redeem it under a different OAuth client registered on the same instance, because the server fails to validate the client_id binding required by RFC 6749 §4.1.3. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; CVSS 7.4 with high attack complexity reflects the requirement that the attacker first intercept the code or token through a separate weakness such as XSS, log exposure, or referrer leakage.
Stored cross-site scripting in Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) lets an authenticated user inject HTML/JavaScript into Personal File Storage (PFS) folder titles, which then execute in any viewer's browser when the folder listing is rendered. The flaw stems from the 'TXT' import filter not encoding HTML combined with unescaped template output, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Discovered by TuranSec; impact extends to other users browsing public folders, enabling session theft or account actions in their context.
Unauthenticated cross-tenant file upload in Typebot.io chatbot builder versions 3.16.1 and earlier allows anonymous visitors of any published bot containing a file-input block to write attacker-controlled HTML, SVG, or JavaScript into arbitrary subpaths of the shared public S3 bucket. The flaw stems from an unauthenticated presigned-URL endpoint that trusts a raw fileName parameter and does not bind Content-Type, enabling stored XSS on the storage origin and content hosting under other tenants' result paths. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 9.3 (scope-changed) reflects significant cross-tenant impact.
Stored XSS in Filament v3 PHP admin panel framework occurs when a RichEditor form field is rendered in disabled mode, because the disabled view binds raw state via Alpine's x-html directive without HTML sanitization. Authenticated attackers who can write into the underlying field state can plant HTML or JavaScript that executes in the browser of any user later viewing the form, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no KEV listing.
Stored cross-site scripting in Gitea 1.25.x affects the built-in 3D file viewer (Online3DViewer integration) where a crafted .gltf file with an unsupported extension name in extensionsRequired is rendered into the DOM via innerHTML without sanitization. Any low-privileged user who can push a file to a repository (including a public fork) can compromise the session of any user who later views the file, enabling token theft and full account takeover. Publicly available exploit code exists (a working PoC is included in the GHSA-9cpj-qc93-vw8v advisory); no public exploit identified at time of analysis in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in Open WebUI versions up to and including 0.9.5 allows any authenticated user holding the default workspace.models permission to embed an SVG payload in a model's profile_image_url and hijack the session of anyone who opens that image URL as a top-level document. The flaw is an incomplete-patch bypass of GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q and GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc - the input validator and the MIME allowlist plus X-Content-Type-Options:nosniff added to the user and webhook endpoints were never applied to ModelMeta or the model image serving endpoint. No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the working PoC included in the advisory, and CVSS 7.6 reflects the cross-origin scope change leading to JWT theft and account takeover.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in Royal Elementor Addons Pro WordPress plugin versions prior to 1.7.1041 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link or page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated nature combined with the popularity of Elementor-ecosystem plugins makes this a credible threat to WordPress sites running the Pro variant. Patchstack disclosure indicates a fixed version is available.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the JetFormBuilder WordPress plugin versions 3.6.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject script into pages rendered to victims. Exploitation requires a victim to interact with a crafted link or form (UI:R), and successful payload execution can hijack sessions or perform actions in the victim's browser context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Ays Pro Popup Box WordPress plugin versions 6.2.9 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser when the victim clicks a crafted link. The CVSS 7.1 score reflects scope change (S:C) typical of XSS escaping the plugin context into the broader WordPress session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected or stored cross-site scripting in the JetEngine WordPress plugin (versions 3.8.10 and earlier) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary script that executes in a victim's browser after the user is lured to a crafted link or page. The flaw was reported by Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change, reflecting impact on the WordPress session context beyond the vulnerable component. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated cross-site scripting in the JetEngine WordPress plugin versions 3.8.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in the browser of any user who interacts with a crafted link or page. The CVSS 7.1 score reflects the scope change inherent to XSS (attacker-supplied JavaScript runs in the victim's site origin), and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, credential theft, or administrative account takeover on affected WordPress sites.
Stored or reflected cross-site scripting in WPFunnels Pro WordPress plugin versions 2.9.4 and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with crafted content. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects the scope-changed impact (S:C) on the WordPress site, including potential session hijacking of administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the JetEngine WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.8.9.1) allows remote attackers to inject malicious script into pages rendered by the plugin, which then executes in the browser of any visitor who interacts with the crafted content. Successful exploitation enables session hijacking, credential theft, or administrative actions performed against logged-in WordPress users including site administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Cozmoslabs Profile Builder Pro WordPress plugin (versions 3.15.0 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change, meaning the injected script can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component (typically the WordPress admin session). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Kapee WordPress theme versions prior to 1.7.1 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction, with a scope change that can impact other components beyond the vulnerable theme. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vulnerability was disclosed via Patchstack with a CVSS of 7.1, reflecting the unauthenticated nature combined with required user interaction.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Collectchat WordPress plugin versions 2.4.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link or page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated nature combined with scope change (S:C) makes this attractive for opportunistic attacks against WordPress sites running the plugin.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the WPZOOM Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin (versions 1.3.4 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary script into a victim's browser session by tricking them into following a crafted link. The flaw was disclosed by Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change, reflecting potential impact on the broader WordPress site context; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the WPJobster WordPress theme through version 6.3.5 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser when the victim clicks a crafted link. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with a scope change (S:C), reflecting impact on browser-side resources beyond the vulnerable application. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, but Patchstack has catalogued it as a confirmed reflected XSS.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Skillate WordPress theme versions 1.2.10 and below allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change (S:C), reflecting that the injected script runs in the WordPress site context and can pivot against authenticated users including administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the VamTam Auto Repair WordPress theme versions 22.6 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser after tricking them into clicking a crafted link. The flaw was disclosed via Patchstack and carries a CVSS 7.1 due to scope change impact on the WordPress admin context; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Taskbuilder WordPress plugin before 5.0.8 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject arbitrary JavaScript by tricking a logged-in user into visiting a crafted URL. The plugin echoes an unsanitised URL parameter directly into inline JavaScript on any frontend page that renders one of its shortcodes, so the payload executes in the victim's authenticated browser session. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though EPSS remains low (0.18%) and the flaw is not in CISA KEV.
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in the weMail WordPress plugin (versions before 2.1.3) lets unauthenticated attackers inject arbitrary JavaScript by luring any logged-in user to a crafted URL, because a user-supplied parameter is reflected unescaped into an HTML attribute on an AJAX endpoint that lacks nonce protection. Successful exploitation runs script in the victim's authenticated browser session - including administrators - enabling session/account takeover of the WordPress site. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though EPSS is low (0.21%) and there is no evidence of active exploitation.
Stored cross-site scripting in n8n workflow automation platform allows authenticated users with workflow edit permissions to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the Chat Trigger node's webhookId parameter. When a logged-in user visits the chat URL, the injected code executes in the n8n origin with the victim's session privileges, enabling account takeover. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor-released patch is available.
Stored/reflected XSS in Remark42 self-hosted comment engine versions 1.6.0 through 1.15.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a Remark42 origin by abusing a Content-Type inconsistency in the image proxy. The proxy trusts the upstream Content-Type header during the download check but re-sniffs bytes when serving, letting an HTML/JS payload advertised as image/png be re-served as text/html from the victim instance's own origin. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; fixed in 1.16.0.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Enfold WordPress theme versions up to and including 7.1.4 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser when the user is lured into clicking a crafted link. The CVSS scope change (S:C) and Low impact across C/I/A indicate the injected script can affect components beyond the vulnerable theme component, typically the authenticated WordPress session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Patchstack's disclosure provides enough detail for skilled researchers to reproduce.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the MagOne WordPress theme versions 9.0 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary script into a victim's browser session when the victim is lured to a crafted link. CVSS rates this 7.1 with a scope change (S:C), reflecting the ability to affect resources beyond the vulnerable component such as the authenticated WordPress session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but Patchstack has published the advisory in their WordPress vulnerability database.
Universal cross-site scripting (UXSS) in Adobe Acrobat PDF Extension for Chrome (versions 26.5.2.2 and earlier) allows remote attackers to disclose cross-origin session data when a victim visits a malicious URL or interacts with a compromised page. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates high confidentiality impact across security boundaries, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The flaw is browser-extension scoped, so impact is limited to users who have installed this Chrome extension.
Address bar spoofing in The Browser Company's Arc Search for Android allows remote attackers to render attacker-controlled content beneath a legitimate-looking URL in the address bar, enabling high-fidelity phishing against mobile users. The flaw maps to CWE-1021 (improper restriction of rendered UI layers) and carries a CVSS 7.4 due to the integrity impact on user trust decisions, though successful exploitation requires user interaction. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a HackerOne report (#3705306) suggests reproducible POC details exist within the disclosure program.
Takeover of Oracle Human Resources in Oracle E-Business Suite versions 12.2.3 through 12.2.15 is possible when a remote unauthenticated attacker tricks a separate user into interacting with a crafted HTTP request targeting the Person component. Despite high attack complexity, successful exploitation yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the HR module. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Remote takeover of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform 13.5 and 24.1 is possible when an unauthenticated attacker over HTTP coerces a victim user into interacting with a crafted request targeting the Metadata Plugin component. The flaw is scope-changing and yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the platform and potentially adjacent products. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-scope takeover of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform 13.5 and 24.1 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to fully compromise the management platform - and potentially additional managed products - by tricking an authenticated user into interacting with a malicious HTTP-delivered payload targeting the Metadata Plugin component. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 9.6 with a scope change reflecting impact beyond the vulnerable component, and at time of analysis no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because Oracle Enterprise Manager centrally controls fleets of Oracle databases, middleware, and infrastructure, successful exploitation has outsized blast-radius implications for downstream Oracle estates.
Same-origin cross-site scripting in n8n workflow automation platform allows an authenticated user with workflow edit privileges to weaponize the Respond to Webhook node and execute JavaScript in another authenticated user's session. The binary response path bypassed the central Content-Security-Policy sandbox header, letting attacker-controlled Content-Type serve executable content from the n8n origin. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Media Library Assistant WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 3.35) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject script that executes in a victim's browser after a user-interaction event (clicking a crafted link). Per Patchstack, the issue affects David Lingren's plugin and currently has no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 7.1 (scope-changed) reflects that successful execution can pivot into authenticated admin contexts.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Pods WordPress plugin (versions 3.3.8 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser when they visit a crafted page or link. The flaw requires user interaction (UI:R) and carries a scope change (S:C), letting injected payloads steal session data or perform privileged actions in the WordPress admin context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated nature and broad WordPress plugin install base make this a meaningful risk for site operators.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the WPFactory 'Min Max Step Quantity Limits Manager for WooCommerce' WordPress plugin (versions 5.2.2 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser after the victim clicks a crafted link. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 is elevated by a scope change (S:C), reflecting that script execution can affect the WordPress admin context, but exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R). No public exploit was identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-site scripting in the SEO Redirection WordPress plugin (versions <= 9.17) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser after user interaction such as clicking a crafted link. The flaw has a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope-changed impact, indicating injected scripts can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the WordPress plugin Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload - Contact Form 7 versions 1.3.9.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction, leading to session theft, account takeover, or pivoting against authenticated administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV. CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.1 with a changed scope reflecting impact across the WordPress admin trust boundary.
Unauthenticated stored/reflected cross-site scripting in the Funnel Builder by FunnelKit WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.15.0.2) allows remote attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser when they visit a crafted page or link. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects a scope-changing impact with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact and required user interaction. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the HollerBox WordPress plugin (versions 2.3.10.1 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link or page. The flaw was disclosed via Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 due to the scope change (S:C) reflecting the WordPress site context being affected from injected content; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing exists.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the WordPress plugin Stop Spammers (versions 2026.3 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser when they interact with crafted content. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 due to scope change (S:C), and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Patchstack has catalogued the issue in its WordPress vulnerability database.
Reflected or stored Cross-Site Scripting in the MW WP Form WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.1.3) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with crafted plugin content. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C) indicates network-reachable exploitation with no privileges but requiring user interaction, and the scope change reflects the cross-origin impact typical of XSS in browser contexts. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Quiz And Survey Master WordPress plugin (versions through 11.1.2) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. Exploitation is reflected in the CVSS 7.1 (High) score with a scope change, meaning injected script can impact resources beyond the vulnerable component. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected or stored cross-site scripting in the Post SMTP WordPress plugin (versions 3.6.2 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The CVSS 7.1 score with scope change reflects potential session theft or administrative action hijacking against WordPress sites running the plugin. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is tracked by Patchstack but not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Product Filter Widget for Elementor WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.0.6) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw was disclosed via Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change due to script execution in the browser context; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected/stored Cross-Site Scripting in the WordPress plugin AutomatorWP versions 5.7.2 and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser when they visit a crafted link or page. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects a scope change (S:C), meaning script execution affects components beyond the vulnerable one - typically authenticated WordPress administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored or reflected cross-site scripting in the EventPrime WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.3.2.1) allows authenticated users with Subscriber-level privileges to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in other users' browsers. The flaw was disclosed by Patchstack and currently has no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the low privilege bar makes it attractive for opportunistic attackers on multi-user WordPress sites. No CISA KEV listing or EPSS data was supplied with this report.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored Cross-Site Scripting in the Classified Listing WordPress plugin versions 5.3.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw was reported by Patchstack and carries CVSS 7.1 due to the scope change affecting the broader WordPress site context, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Risk is elevated for sites running the plugin in publicly accessible classified/marketplace deployments where untrusted visitor input is processed.
Unauthenticated stored/reflected cross-site scripting in the AutomatorWP WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.6.7) allows remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the context of victim browsers, including site administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS scope-change rating (7.2 High) reflects the cross-origin impact typical of XSS where attacker-supplied script crosses a trust boundary into the WordPress admin session. Patchstack reported the issue and tracks it in their WordPress vulnerability database.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Favicon Rotator WordPress plugin (versions 1.2.11 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The CVSS scope-changed vector (S:C) indicates the injected script can impact resources beyond the vulnerable plugin component, typically the entire WordPress site context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not on the CISA KEV list, but the unauthenticated nature combined with WordPress's broad install base elevates real-world concern.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the WP Time Slots Booking Form WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.2.46) lets remote unauthenticated attackers inject script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw, reported by Patchstack and tracked as EUVD-2026-36994, carries a CVSS 7.1 due to the scope change against the WordPress origin, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the H5P WordPress plugin (versions 1.17.6 and earlier) lets an unauthenticated attacker inject script that executes in a victim's browser when they follow a crafted link, per the CVSS PR:N/UI:R vector. Because the scope is changed (S:C), successful execution can reach beyond the vulnerable component into the authenticated WordPress session context, enabling session/cookie theft or admin-context actions. There is no public exploit identified and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, so risk is moderate (CVSS 7.1) and contingent on social-engineering a logged-in user.
Stored/reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Melapress's WP Activity Log WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.6.3.1, reported by Patchstack) lets a low-privileged Subscriber-level user inject script that executes in another user's browser, with a CVSS-rated scope change (S:C) meaning the payload can affect resources beyond the plugin's own security context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; direct impact is limited (C:L/I:L/A:L) but the cross-context scope and low attack complexity make it relevant for sites that allow open registration.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Email Address Encoder WordPress plugin (free, before 1.0.25) and its Email Encoder Premium counterpart (before 0.3.12) lets unauthenticated visitors inject persistent JavaScript through the plugin's flawed email-replacement handling. Publicly available exploit code exists (disclosed by WPScan) and a vendor patch is available, but it is not in CISA KEV, so there is no public exploit identified as actively used in the wild. Successful exploitation executes attacker script in the browser of any user who later renders the affected page, typically an authenticated administrator.
Authentication bypass via cross-site scripting in Quest NetVault Backup's addclient3 webpage allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script that executes in a victim's authenticated session, bypassing access controls. Disclosed through Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI-26-369, formerly ZDI-CAN-27666), the flaw requires user interaction - the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file - and can be chained with other weaknesses to achieve code execution in the SYSTEM context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, though the high CVSS of 8.8 reflects the serious downstream RCE potential.
Authentication bypass via cross-site scripting in the Quest NetVault Backup viewclient web interface lets remote attackers inject arbitrary script that, when a victim visits a malicious page or opens a malicious file, runs in the application context and circumvents authentication. Disclosed through Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI-26-377, ZDI-CAN-28202), the flaw can be chained with additional vulnerabilities to achieve code execution as SYSTEM. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CVSS 8.8 rating reflects the high impact of the auth-bypass-plus-RCE chain.
Stored cross-site scripting leading to OS command execution in SiYuan, an open-source personal knowledge management system, affects all desktop client versions prior to 3.7.0. Untrusted marketplace package metadata (name, version, author, description) is serialized via JSON.stringify() into a single-quoted data-obj HTML attribute without escaping single quotes or angle brackets, so a package name containing a single quote breaks out of the attribute and injects arbitrary HTML; because the Electron BrowserWindow runs with nodeIntegration:true and contextIsolation:false, the DOM XSS escalates to arbitrary command execution on the host. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-x88j-wgpr-h22x) notes this is the same root cause and impact as a prior advisory, reached through a sibling sink the earlier patch missed.
Arbitrary command execution in the SiYuan Electron desktop client (versions prior to 3.7.0) allows a remote attacker to run OS commands on a victim's machine when they merely view a malicious Bazaar marketplace package's README. The root cause is that Lute's HTML sanitizer fails to strip <iframe> elements, which combine with the Electron client's permissive security settings (e.g. node integration / relaxed sandboxing) to escalate stored XSS into full code execution; notably no package installation is required, only viewing the package details. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 (High) reflects high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan's Attribute View (database) asset cell renderer escalates to remote code execution on the Electron desktop client for all versions prior to 3.7.0. An attacker who can persist crafted content into a database asset cell has malicious JavaScript executed in the privileged Electron context, breaking out to the host operating system; the issue carries a 9.9 CVSS and is fixed in 3.7.0. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan's attribute-view (database) cell renderer, affecting all versions prior to 3.7.0, lets a low-privileged attacker with write access to a synced workspace plant a persistent payload that runs arbitrary JavaScript when a victim opens the block-attribute panel. The genAVValueHTML function interpolates cell content raw in its text, url, phone, and mAsset branches and the Go kernel never escapes the value on input, so the malicious row survives sync byte-for-byte and fires on every device that renders it; on the Electron desktop client (nodeIntegration:true) the XSS escalates to host remote code execution via require('child_process'). CVSS is rated 9.9; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan personal knowledge management system before 3.7.0 allows a third-party Bazaar package author to execute JavaScript in an Administrator's authenticated workspace origin. The lute sanitizer used by renderPackageREADME relies on a stale event-handler blocklist that omits modern DOM event attributes (onpointerover, onpointerdown, onauxclick, onbeforetoggle, onfocusin, onanimationstart, ontransitionend), and the rendered README HTML is injected via innerHTML with no client-side DOMPurify and no CSP/X-Frame-Options/X-Content-Type-Options headers. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but successful exploitation yields full control of the victim's workspace.
Origin-validation bypass in SiYuan Note (open-source personal knowledge management) before 3.7.0 lets any installed Chrome/Chromium browser extension obtain RoleAdministrator access to the local kernel HTTP server at 127.0.0.1:6806. Because the kernel unconditionally trusts all chrome-extension:// origins and desktop installs ship with an empty AccessAuthCode by default, a malicious or supply-chain-compromised extension can issue fully authenticated admin API calls with no further authentication, enabling data exfiltration, stored XSS injection, and configuration tampering. Publicly available exploit code exists; there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited.
Stored cross-site scripting in SiYuan personal knowledge management before 3.7.0 lets an attacker with write access to a synced workspace plant a CSS snippet whose '</style>' sequence breaks out of the surrounding <style> tag when renderSnippet() interpolates it via insertAdjacentHTML, running arbitrary JavaScript in the renderer. On Electron desktop builds the renderer runs with nodeIntegration:true, so the injected handler can reach require('child_process') and escalate the XSS to full host remote code execution. The payload syncs through the workspace repository and fires automatically on every device that pulls, and it bypasses the user's enabledJS=off setting; no public exploit or CISA KEV listing is identified at time of analysis.
Cross-site scripting (JavaScript injection) in Ghost's ActivityPub client (@tryghost/activitypub) prior to version 3.1.0 allows a malicious federated server to embed attacker-controlled script in shared posts that executes in the browser of a victim Ghost user who views the content. The flaw stems from improper sanitization of post content received over ActivityPub federation, enabling session theft or actions performed in the victim's authenticated context. There is no public exploit identified at the time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-site scripting in OpenText Access Manager 5.1 through 5.1.2 lets a remote unauthenticated attacker inject script that executes in the browser of a targeted user of this enterprise SSO/access-management platform (CWE-79). Per the vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector the flaw carries high vulnerable-system confidentiality impact (VC:H) but high attack complexity and a specific attack requirement (AC:H/AT:P), yielding a base score of 8.2. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated stored cross-site scripting in the WP Meta SEO WordPress plugin (versions ≤ 4.5.18 by Joomunited) lets remote attackers persist arbitrary JavaScript into the `wp_wpms_links.link_url` database column by sending HTTP requests with a malicious URI to any 404 path. The payload executes in the browser of any administrator who opens the plugin's '404 & Redirects' admin page, enabling session hijacking or admin-on-behalf actions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; no KEV listing.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Cincopa video and media plug-in for WordPress (versions ≤1.163) allows unauthenticated commenters to inject persistent JavaScript via the [cincopa] shortcode processed by the comment_text filter. Any visitor or administrator viewing the affected post executes the attacker's script in their browser session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Email JavaScript Cloak WordPress plugin (versions ≤1.03) allows authenticated contributors and higher to inject arbitrary JavaScript via unsanitized attributes of the plugin's 'email' shortcode. The payload executes in any visitor's browser that renders the affected page, enabling session theft or site defacement. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the plugin is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the ARForms WordPress plugin (versions ≤7.1.3) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the `value` parameter of the `arf_save_incomplete_form_data` AJAX endpoint, with the payload executing in an administrator's browser when they view the Partial Filled Form Entries dashboard page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Wordfence's disclosure provides enough technical detail to reproduce the injection. Successful exploitation typically leads to admin account takeover and full WordPress site compromise.
Stored cross-site scripting in FlatPress (commits prior to 10be83c) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject persistent HTML and JavaScript via the name, URL, and email fields of comment and contact forms. The payloads execute in any viewer's browser - including administrators reviewing comments in the admin panel - and weak URL scheme validation additionally permits javascript: and data: URI injection. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the patch and a third-party advisory disclose the affected sinks in detail.
Reflected cross-site scripting in Immich (commits 4ffa26c9 through pre-4eb1003) allows a single-click account takeover of any authenticated user by abusing the unvalidated continue query parameter on /auth/login, which is passed directly to SvelteKit's redirect() without scheme or origin checks. The payload executes attacker-controlled JavaScript inside Immich's origin and uses the victim's session to mint an all-permission API key, yielding persistent compromise. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the upstream fix commit and a detailed GHSA advisory describe the flaw clearly enough to derive a working PoC.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Simple Basic Contact Form WordPress plugin (all versions through 20250114) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a visitor's browser when the victim follows a crafted link or submits a cross-site forged form that triggers a validation error. Publicly available exploit details have been published by WPScan, though the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no EPSS data is provided in the input.
Stored cross-site scripting in Gogs (self-hosted Git service) versions through 0.14.2 allows a low-privileged repository user to inject JavaScript via a crafted Jupyter notebook (.ipynb) Markdown cell containing a javascript: scheme link, which executes in the Gogs origin when a victim clicks the rendered link. Although server-side sanitization is performed via /-/api/sanitize_ipynb, the client subsequently re-renders Markdown cells with marked() and regenerates the dangerous links, and the file preview page is served without a Content Security Policy. Publicly available exploit code exists (full PoC published in the GHSA advisory) but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively exploited in the wild.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the federation endpoints of OpenIdentityPlatform OpenAM allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject script into the OpenAM origin by luring a victim to a crafted URL, but only when a non-default clustering configuration (the SAML2 cluster cookie-hash-redirect path handled by FSUtils.postToTarget) is in use. The flaw is an output-encoding inconsistency (CWE-79) in the openam-federation-library package, fixed in version 16.1.1 via upstream commit 2f5e9bf4. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing was identified at time of analysis, and because execution runs in the trusted identity-provider origin, a successful attack can drive authenticated state-changing actions rather than merely steal a low-value session.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the OpenAM OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect authorization endpoint allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject HTML and JavaScript into the `form_post` response page rendered in the OpenAM origin by manipulating the OAuth `state` parameter. The flaw affects the `openam-oauth2` module of org.openidentityplatform.openam from version 13.0.0 up to (but not including) 16.1.1, and is fixed in the 16.1.1 release. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing were identified at time of analysis, but the vulnerable templates are shipped by default and the injection point is a standard, client-controllable OAuth parameter.
Command injection via untrusted Markdown rendering in the Angular Language Service VS Code extension (versions prior to 21.2.4) allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands on a developer's host when the developer hovers over and clicks a crafted JSDoc tooltip. The client trusts all rendered Markdown (isTrusted: true) while the language server fails to sanitize JSDoc content, enabling embedded command: URIs to fire from malicious source files or npm dependencies. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the supply-chain reach via npm packages makes this a notable developer-workstation risk.
Arbitrary code execution in the Angular Language Service VS Code extension prior to 21.2.4 allows attackers to silently run code on a developer's machine simply by having them open a malicious repository in VS Code. The extension reads the typescript.tsdk and js/ts.tsdk.path workspace settings without checking Workspace Trust, then require()s a tsserverlibrary.js file from that attacker-controlled path. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the patch diff in PR #68857 clearly illustrates the exploit primitive.
Stored cross-site scripting in the Transbank Webpay WordPress plugin before 1.14.0 lets unauthenticated visitors inject malicious script into plugin log entries that execute in the browser of any administrator who later views the logs. Because injection requires no authentication and the payload runs in a privileged admin session, it can be used to hijack the WordPress backend; publicly available exploit code exists and a public write-up chains the flaw toward remote code execution. EPSS is low (0.16%, 6th percentile) and CISA SSVC records no observed exploitation, so real-world targeting appears limited despite the high CVSS of 7.1.
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in the Ultimate WooCommerce Auction Pro WordPress plugin (all versions through 2.4.5) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into a page by tricking a logged-in high-privilege user, such as an administrator, into clicking a crafted link. The flaw stems from an unsanitized, unescaped request parameter reflected back into the response, and publicly available exploit code exists (reported by WPScan), though EPSS probability is low (0.15%, 4th percentile) and there is no evidence of active exploitation.
Remote code execution in SiYuan note-taking application (before v3.6.1) allows any malicious Bazaar marketplace package author to compromise users via unsanitized HTML rendering of package displayName, description, and README content. Because the Electron renderer is configured with nodeIntegration:true and contextIsolation:false, injected JavaScript pivots directly to arbitrary OS command execution. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but VulnCheck published a detailed technical advisory documenting both zero-click (metadata) and one-click (README) vectors.
Remote code execution in SiYuan note-taking application before v3.6.1 occurs when users browse the built-in Bazaar marketplace, because package metadata (displayName, description) and README content are rendered without HTML sanitization. Because the Electron shell ships with nodeIntegration:true and contextIsolation:false, an injected script in the renderer executes arbitrary OS commands as the user. Reported by VulnCheck with detailed vulnerable-code analysis published in the GHSA advisory; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the StarCitizenWiki EmbedVideo MediaWiki extension (versions <= 4.0.0) allows any user with page-edit rights to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the data-mw-iframeconfig attribute by supplying a malformed URL or ID containing single quotes for the archiveorg, wistia, or sharepoint services. The flaw is present under the default $wgEmbedVideoRequireConsent=true configuration and executes in the wiki origin for every visitor that loads the affected page, with publicly available exploit code exists in the GHSA advisory.
Cross-window message spoofing in TinaCMS (npm tinacms and @tinacms/app) lets a malicious web page hijack an authenticated editing session because the useTina overlay handler, the OAuth authentication popup handler, and the admin↔preview iframe GraphQL reducer act on window.postMessage event.data without validating event.origin or event.source, and reply with wildcard target origins. An attacker who lures an authenticated Tina editor to a crafted page (or gains an opener/iframe relationship with the Tina admin) can forge messages to drive the editor, inject preview content, or observe and forge the OAuth popup channel to take over the session. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis; a vendor patch is available in PR #7056 and the flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 base score of 7.6.
Stored cross-site scripting in the StarCitizenWiki EmbedVideo MediaWiki extension (versions <= 4.0.0) allows any wiki user to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript into rendered pages by abusing the unsanitized class attribute on embed tags such as <youtube>. Because the user-supplied class is concatenated into an HTML template via sprintf without escaping, an attacker can break out of the class attribute and execute script in the context of every visitor that views the page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the advisory's own PoC, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in the EmbedVideo MediaWiki extension allows authenticated wiki editors to inject arbitrary JavaScript by providing a malicious service name in parser tags. An attacker with page edit privileges can embed HTML/JavaScript that executes in the context of any visitor's browser, leading to session hijacking, content defacement, or other client-side attacks. Publicly available exploit code exists, and affected versions <=4.0.0 of the composer package are vulnerable.
Stored cross-site scripting in the jupyterlab-git extension (versions 0.30.0b3 through 0.53.x) escalates to remote code execution when a victim views a rename diff in the Git History tab. The PlainTextDiff.ts createHeader() method injects unsanitized Git filenames into innerHTML, so a filename such as <img src=x onerror=eval(atob(...))>.py fires JavaScript that reads the _xsrf cookie, spawns a JupyterLab terminal via POST /api/terminals, and runs arbitrary shell commands. Reported by AWS Security; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the vendor advisory (GHSA-f962-v9hr-pfg5) documents a detailed reproduction path, and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in pgAdmin 4 versions 6.0 through 9.15 allows a malicious or attacker-influenced PostgreSQL server to inject arbitrary HTML into pgAdmin's interface via ErrorResponse messages and EXPLAIN plan fields rendered through html-react-parser. Because the injection executes inside pgAdmin's own DOM, an attacker can render convincing phishing dialogs or redirect the top-level tab via iframe srcdoc, bypassing standard X-Frame-Options and frame-ancestors protections. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor has shipped a multi-layer fix in 9.16.
DOM-based cross-site scripting in AutoGPT versions prior to 0.6.62 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated victim's browser by tricking them into clicking a crafted signup-page link whose `next` URL parameter is passed unsanitized into `router.push`. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-j2cp-jg5q-38wj) confirms the issue and ships a fix in 0.6.62.
Stored cross-site scripting in Kirby CMS (getkirby/cms) lets an authenticated Panel editor inject markup that survives Dom::sanitize() and executes as JavaScript when content is rendered in the Panel or on the site frontend. The flaw affects the writer and list fields plus the Sane HTML/SVG/XML sanitization API, and versions ≤ 4.9.3 and 5.0.0-alpha.1 through 5.4.3 are vulnerable. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and this is not in CISA KEV, but the vendor rates it high severity because a low-privileged editor can escalate to an admin session.
Cross-site scripting in Kirby CMS's Panel writer field (versions <= 4.9.3 and 5.0.0-alpha.1 through 5.4.3) lets an authenticated user inject a JavaScript-scheme URL into the link or email marks that executes in their own browser session when clicked before the content is saved. In Kirby's default configuration this is limited to self-XSS requiring social engineering, but Panel plugins that embed the <k-writer> component without sanitizing HTML before storage can be escalated to stored XSS affecting other users. There is no public exploit and it is not in CISA KEV; the vendor rates it high severity for affected sites.
Stored cross-site scripting in jupyter_server's nbconvert HTTP handlers allows a malicious notebook to execute JavaScript in the Jupyter origin, leading to session token theft, full /api/* control, and kernel remote code execution. The NbconvertFileHandler and NbconvertPostHandler render notebook-authored HTML without a CSP sandbox directive, and combined with HTMLExporter's non-sanitizing default, any display_data HTML payload runs with the victim's authority. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.3 and a vendor patch is available in v2.20.0.
Authentication bypass in Zitadel identity platform (versions 3.0.0-3.4.11 and 4.0.0-4.15.1) allows an attacker who has obtained a victim's authorization code, refresh token, or device authorization grant to redeem it under a different OAuth client registered on the same instance, because the server fails to validate the client_id binding required by RFC 6749 §4.1.3. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; CVSS 7.4 with high attack complexity reflects the requirement that the attacker first intercept the code or token through a separate weakness such as XSS, log exposure, or referrer leakage.
Stored cross-site scripting in Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) lets an authenticated user inject HTML/JavaScript into Personal File Storage (PFS) folder titles, which then execute in any viewer's browser when the folder listing is rendered. The flaw stems from the 'TXT' import filter not encoding HTML combined with unescaped template output, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Discovered by TuranSec; impact extends to other users browsing public folders, enabling session theft or account actions in their context.
Unauthenticated cross-tenant file upload in Typebot.io chatbot builder versions 3.16.1 and earlier allows anonymous visitors of any published bot containing a file-input block to write attacker-controlled HTML, SVG, or JavaScript into arbitrary subpaths of the shared public S3 bucket. The flaw stems from an unauthenticated presigned-URL endpoint that trusts a raw fileName parameter and does not bind Content-Type, enabling stored XSS on the storage origin and content hosting under other tenants' result paths. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 9.3 (scope-changed) reflects significant cross-tenant impact.
Stored XSS in Filament v3 PHP admin panel framework occurs when a RichEditor form field is rendered in disabled mode, because the disabled view binds raw state via Alpine's x-html directive without HTML sanitization. Authenticated attackers who can write into the underlying field state can plant HTML or JavaScript that executes in the browser of any user later viewing the form, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no KEV listing.
Stored cross-site scripting in Gitea 1.25.x affects the built-in 3D file viewer (Online3DViewer integration) where a crafted .gltf file with an unsupported extension name in extensionsRequired is rendered into the DOM via innerHTML without sanitization. Any low-privileged user who can push a file to a repository (including a public fork) can compromise the session of any user who later views the file, enabling token theft and full account takeover. Publicly available exploit code exists (a working PoC is included in the GHSA-9cpj-qc93-vw8v advisory); no public exploit identified at time of analysis in CISA KEV.
Stored cross-site scripting in Open WebUI versions up to and including 0.9.5 allows any authenticated user holding the default workspace.models permission to embed an SVG payload in a model's profile_image_url and hijack the session of anyone who opens that image URL as a top-level document. The flaw is an incomplete-patch bypass of GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q and GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc - the input validator and the MIME allowlist plus X-Content-Type-Options:nosniff added to the user and webhook endpoints were never applied to ModelMeta or the model image serving endpoint. No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the working PoC included in the advisory, and CVSS 7.6 reflects the cross-origin scope change leading to JWT theft and account takeover.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in Royal Elementor Addons Pro WordPress plugin versions prior to 1.7.1041 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link or page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated nature combined with the popularity of Elementor-ecosystem plugins makes this a credible threat to WordPress sites running the Pro variant. Patchstack disclosure indicates a fixed version is available.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the JetFormBuilder WordPress plugin versions 3.6.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject script into pages rendered to victims. Exploitation requires a victim to interact with a crafted link or form (UI:R), and successful payload execution can hijack sessions or perform actions in the victim's browser context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Ays Pro Popup Box WordPress plugin versions 6.2.9 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser when the victim clicks a crafted link. The CVSS 7.1 score reflects scope change (S:C) typical of XSS escaping the plugin context into the broader WordPress session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected or stored cross-site scripting in the JetEngine WordPress plugin (versions 3.8.10 and earlier) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary script that executes in a victim's browser after the user is lured to a crafted link or page. The flaw was reported by Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change, reflecting impact on the WordPress session context beyond the vulnerable component. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated cross-site scripting in the JetEngine WordPress plugin versions 3.8.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in the browser of any user who interacts with a crafted link or page. The CVSS 7.1 score reflects the scope change inherent to XSS (attacker-supplied JavaScript runs in the victim's site origin), and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, credential theft, or administrative account takeover on affected WordPress sites.
Stored or reflected cross-site scripting in WPFunnels Pro WordPress plugin versions 2.9.4 and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with crafted content. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects the scope-changed impact (S:C) on the WordPress site, including potential session hijacking of administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the JetEngine WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.8.9.1) allows remote attackers to inject malicious script into pages rendered by the plugin, which then executes in the browser of any visitor who interacts with the crafted content. Successful exploitation enables session hijacking, credential theft, or administrative actions performed against logged-in WordPress users including site administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Cozmoslabs Profile Builder Pro WordPress plugin (versions 3.15.0 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change, meaning the injected script can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component (typically the WordPress admin session). No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Kapee WordPress theme versions prior to 1.7.1 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction, with a scope change that can impact other components beyond the vulnerable theme. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vulnerability was disclosed via Patchstack with a CVSS of 7.1, reflecting the unauthenticated nature combined with required user interaction.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Collectchat WordPress plugin versions 2.4.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link or page. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated nature combined with scope change (S:C) makes this attractive for opportunistic attacks against WordPress sites running the plugin.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the WPZOOM Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin (versions 1.3.4 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary script into a victim's browser session by tricking them into following a crafted link. The flaw was disclosed by Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change, reflecting potential impact on the broader WordPress site context; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the WPJobster WordPress theme through version 6.3.5 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser when the victim clicks a crafted link. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with a scope change (S:C), reflecting impact on browser-side resources beyond the vulnerable application. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, but Patchstack has catalogued it as a confirmed reflected XSS.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Skillate WordPress theme versions 1.2.10 and below allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change (S:C), reflecting that the injected script runs in the WordPress site context and can pivot against authenticated users including administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the VamTam Auto Repair WordPress theme versions 22.6 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser after tricking them into clicking a crafted link. The flaw was disclosed via Patchstack and carries a CVSS 7.1 due to scope change impact on the WordPress admin context; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Taskbuilder WordPress plugin before 5.0.8 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject arbitrary JavaScript by tricking a logged-in user into visiting a crafted URL. The plugin echoes an unsanitised URL parameter directly into inline JavaScript on any frontend page that renders one of its shortcodes, so the payload executes in the victim's authenticated browser session. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though EPSS remains low (0.18%) and the flaw is not in CISA KEV.
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in the weMail WordPress plugin (versions before 2.1.3) lets unauthenticated attackers inject arbitrary JavaScript by luring any logged-in user to a crafted URL, because a user-supplied parameter is reflected unescaped into an HTML attribute on an AJAX endpoint that lacks nonce protection. Successful exploitation runs script in the victim's authenticated browser session - including administrators - enabling session/account takeover of the WordPress site. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though EPSS is low (0.21%) and there is no evidence of active exploitation.
Stored cross-site scripting in n8n workflow automation platform allows authenticated users with workflow edit permissions to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the Chat Trigger node's webhookId parameter. When a logged-in user visits the chat URL, the injected code executes in the n8n origin with the victim's session privileges, enabling account takeover. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor-released patch is available.
Stored/reflected XSS in Remark42 self-hosted comment engine versions 1.6.0 through 1.15.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a Remark42 origin by abusing a Content-Type inconsistency in the image proxy. The proxy trusts the upstream Content-Type header during the download check but re-sniffs bytes when serving, letting an HTML/JS payload advertised as image/png be re-served as text/html from the victim instance's own origin. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; fixed in 1.16.0.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Enfold WordPress theme versions up to and including 7.1.4 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser when the user is lured into clicking a crafted link. The CVSS scope change (S:C) and Low impact across C/I/A indicate the injected script can affect components beyond the vulnerable theme component, typically the authenticated WordPress session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Patchstack's disclosure provides enough detail for skilled researchers to reproduce.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the MagOne WordPress theme versions 9.0 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary script into a victim's browser session when the victim is lured to a crafted link. CVSS rates this 7.1 with a scope change (S:C), reflecting the ability to affect resources beyond the vulnerable component such as the authenticated WordPress session. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but Patchstack has published the advisory in their WordPress vulnerability database.
Universal cross-site scripting (UXSS) in Adobe Acrobat PDF Extension for Chrome (versions 26.5.2.2 and earlier) allows remote attackers to disclose cross-origin session data when a victim visits a malicious URL or interacts with a compromised page. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates high confidentiality impact across security boundaries, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The flaw is browser-extension scoped, so impact is limited to users who have installed this Chrome extension.
Address bar spoofing in The Browser Company's Arc Search for Android allows remote attackers to render attacker-controlled content beneath a legitimate-looking URL in the address bar, enabling high-fidelity phishing against mobile users. The flaw maps to CWE-1021 (improper restriction of rendered UI layers) and carries a CVSS 7.4 due to the integrity impact on user trust decisions, though successful exploitation requires user interaction. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a HackerOne report (#3705306) suggests reproducible POC details exist within the disclosure program.
Takeover of Oracle Human Resources in Oracle E-Business Suite versions 12.2.3 through 12.2.15 is possible when a remote unauthenticated attacker tricks a separate user into interacting with a crafted HTTP request targeting the Person component. Despite high attack complexity, successful exploitation yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the HR module. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Remote takeover of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform 13.5 and 24.1 is possible when an unauthenticated attacker over HTTP coerces a victim user into interacting with a crafted request targeting the Metadata Plugin component. The flaw is scope-changing and yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the platform and potentially adjacent products. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-scope takeover of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform 13.5 and 24.1 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to fully compromise the management platform - and potentially additional managed products - by tricking an authenticated user into interacting with a malicious HTTP-delivered payload targeting the Metadata Plugin component. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 9.6 with a scope change reflecting impact beyond the vulnerable component, and at time of analysis no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because Oracle Enterprise Manager centrally controls fleets of Oracle databases, middleware, and infrastructure, successful exploitation has outsized blast-radius implications for downstream Oracle estates.
Same-origin cross-site scripting in n8n workflow automation platform allows an authenticated user with workflow edit privileges to weaponize the Respond to Webhook node and execute JavaScript in another authenticated user's session. The binary response path bypassed the central Content-Security-Policy sandbox header, letting attacker-controlled Content-Type serve executable content from the n8n origin. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the Media Library Assistant WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 3.35) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject script that executes in a victim's browser after a user-interaction event (clicking a crafted link). Per Patchstack, the issue affects David Lingren's plugin and currently has no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 7.1 (scope-changed) reflects that successful execution can pivot into authenticated admin contexts.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Pods WordPress plugin (versions 3.3.8 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser when they visit a crafted page or link. The flaw requires user interaction (UI:R) and carries a scope change (S:C), letting injected payloads steal session data or perform privileged actions in the WordPress admin context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated nature and broad WordPress plugin install base make this a meaningful risk for site operators.
Reflected cross-site scripting in the WPFactory 'Min Max Step Quantity Limits Manager for WooCommerce' WordPress plugin (versions 5.2.2 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser after the victim clicks a crafted link. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 is elevated by a scope change (S:C), reflecting that script execution can affect the WordPress admin context, but exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R). No public exploit was identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Cross-site scripting in the SEO Redirection WordPress plugin (versions <= 9.17) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser after user interaction such as clicking a crafted link. The flaw has a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope-changed impact, indicating injected scripts can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the WordPress plugin Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload - Contact Form 7 versions 1.3.9.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction, leading to session theft, account takeover, or pivoting against authenticated administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV. CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.1 with a changed scope reflecting impact across the WordPress admin trust boundary.
Unauthenticated stored/reflected cross-site scripting in the Funnel Builder by FunnelKit WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.15.0.2) allows remote attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser when they visit a crafted page or link. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects a scope-changing impact with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact and required user interaction. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the HollerBox WordPress plugin (versions 2.3.10.1 and earlier) allows remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with a crafted link or page. The flaw was disclosed via Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 due to the scope change (S:C) reflecting the WordPress site context being affected from injected content; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing exists.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the WordPress plugin Stop Spammers (versions 2026.3 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in a victim's browser when they interact with crafted content. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 due to scope change (S:C), and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Patchstack has catalogued the issue in its WordPress vulnerability database.
Reflected or stored Cross-Site Scripting in the MW WP Form WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.1.3) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser when they interact with crafted plugin content. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C) indicates network-reachable exploitation with no privileges but requiring user interaction, and the scope change reflects the cross-origin impact typical of XSS in browser contexts. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Quiz And Survey Master WordPress plugin (versions through 11.1.2) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. Exploitation is reflected in the CVSS 7.1 (High) score with a scope change, meaning injected script can impact resources beyond the vulnerable component. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected or stored cross-site scripting in the Post SMTP WordPress plugin (versions 3.6.2 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The CVSS 7.1 score with scope change reflects potential session theft or administrative action hijacking against WordPress sites running the plugin. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is tracked by Patchstack but not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Product Filter Widget for Elementor WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.0.6) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw was disclosed via Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 with scope change due to script execution in the browser context; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Reflected/stored Cross-Site Scripting in the WordPress plugin AutomatorWP versions 5.7.2 and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser when they visit a crafted link or page. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects a scope change (S:C), meaning script execution affects components beyond the vulnerable one - typically authenticated WordPress administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored or reflected cross-site scripting in the EventPrime WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.3.2.1) allows authenticated users with Subscriber-level privileges to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in other users' browsers. The flaw was disclosed by Patchstack and currently has no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the low privilege bar makes it attractive for opportunistic attackers on multi-user WordPress sites. No CISA KEV listing or EPSS data was supplied with this report.
Unauthenticated reflected/stored Cross-Site Scripting in the Classified Listing WordPress plugin versions 5.3.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw was reported by Patchstack and carries CVSS 7.1 due to the scope change affecting the broader WordPress site context, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Risk is elevated for sites running the plugin in publicly accessible classified/marketplace deployments where untrusted visitor input is processed.
Unauthenticated stored/reflected cross-site scripting in the AutomatorWP WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.6.7) allows remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the context of victim browsers, including site administrators. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS scope-change rating (7.2 High) reflects the cross-origin impact typical of XSS where attacker-supplied script crosses a trust boundary into the WordPress admin session. Patchstack reported the issue and tracks it in their WordPress vulnerability database.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the Favicon Rotator WordPress plugin (versions 1.2.11 and earlier) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The CVSS scope-changed vector (S:C) indicates the injected script can impact resources beyond the vulnerable plugin component, typically the entire WordPress site context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not on the CISA KEV list, but the unauthenticated nature combined with WordPress's broad install base elevates real-world concern.
Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the WP Time Slots Booking Form WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.2.46) lets remote unauthenticated attackers inject script that executes in a victim's browser after user interaction. The flaw, reported by Patchstack and tracked as EUVD-2026-36994, carries a CVSS 7.1 due to the scope change against the WordPress origin, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.