Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege network credentials
-
DeliveryReach EFS network interface
-
ExploitSend crafted code-injection payload
-
ExecutionTrigger arbitrary code execution
-
ImpactFull host compromise (C/I/A)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to be an authenticated/authorized principal with at least low-level privileges on the network (PR:L), targeting the Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) component reachable over the network (AV:N). No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L). The primary limiting factors are the pre-existing authentication requirement and the need for network reachability to the EFS service - this is not an unauthenticated internet-facing flaw. Affected systems are Windows builds below the patched versions listed in EUVD (e.g., Windows Server 2025 <10.0.26100.33650, Windows 11 24H2 <10.0.26100.9711, Windows Server 2016/2019/2022 and Windows 10 1607-22H2); fully patched hosts are not exploitable. |
| Impact | This is a credible, mid-to-high priority vulnerability but not an emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw requiring only low-level privileges and no user interaction, yielding total CIA impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) - consistent with the 8.8 base score and the RCE/CWE-94 code-injection classification. However, the exploitation signals temper this: CISA's SSVC framework records Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no', and there is no CISA KEV listing and no public proof-of-concept, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The signals are internally consistent rather than conflicting - high technical impact (SSVC 'Total' matches C:H/I:H/A:H) but currently no observed or automatable exploitation. The key limiting factor is PR:L: the attacker must already be an authenticated/authorized principal on the network, which narrows this from a mass-exploitable internet worm toward post-authentication lateral movement or privilege escalation. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood could not be weighed. Net: patch on a normal prioritized cycle (elevated for domain-joined/high-value Windows hosts), but this is not drop-everything unless internal authenticated access is part of your threat model. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained low-privilege authenticated access on the network sends crafted input to the Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) component, exploiting improper control of code generation (CWE-94) to inject and execute arbitrary code on the target host. Because no user interaction is required and attack complexity is low, a single malicious network request from an authenticated foothold can yield full code execution. No public exploit code has been identified, so exploitation currently requires original vulnerability-research capability. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Code injection in the Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) allows an authenticated attacker holding only low-level privileges (PR:L) to execute arbitrary code over the network against unpatched Windows hosts, with high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 8.8). Every supported Windows branch is in scope, including Windows 10 1607 through 22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, and Windows Server 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025 (Server Core included), and exploitation requires network reachability to the EFS component rather than any user interaction. Microsoft has published patched builds for each affected branch, and at time of analysis there is no CISA KEV listing, no public exploit code identified, and CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' with automatable set to 'no'.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-83759 through the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83759) or standard Windows Update servicing, which brings each branch to or above its fixed build: 10.0.14393.9612 (Server 2016 / Windows 10 1607), 10.0.17763.9376 (Server 2019 and Server Core / Windows 10 1809), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2 and 22H2 as listed in EUVD), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025 and Server Core), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), and 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2); patch availability is confirmed by the vendor, but this is not an emergency patch cycle, so it can be scheduled with normal monthly maintenance while exposure is contained. If immediate patching is not possible, the highest-value compensating control is cutting the network path that makes AV:N reachable - block inbound SMB (TCP 445) and RPC (TCP 135 plus the dynamic RPC range) to affected hosts from untrusted segments and restrict the EFS remote interface to a hardened management VLAN, at the cost of breaking file sharing, remote administration, and any application that uses remote EFS operations. Where EFS is not a business requirement, disabling the EFS service / removing the Encrypting File System capability eliminates the vulnerable component entirely; the trade-off is that users lose transparent encryption, and previously encrypted files may become unreadable until the service is restored or keys are exported. Because PR:L applies, tightening who holds even low-privileged network credentials on these hosts (tiered admin, removal of unnecessary local accounts, no shared service accounts) measurably reduces the population of principals able to reach the injection path, but does not remove the flaw, so patch as the primary fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 16 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause falls under CWE-94, improper control of generation of code, meaning attacker-supplied input reaches a code-generation or code-execution path without adequate neutralization before the code is constructed. The affected technology is the Windows Encrypting File System, the NTFS-based transparent file-encryption subsystem whose management and remote operations are exposed through EFS interfaces reachable over the network (EFS RPC surfaced via SMB named pipes and RPC endpoints), which is consistent with the AV:N metric while the PR:L metric shows the path sits behind an authentication boundary. The EUVD version data pins the affected products to specific Windows build numbers (e.g., 10.0.14393.x, 10.0.17763.x, 10.0.19044/19045.x, 10.0.20348.x, 10.0.22631.x, 10.0.26100.x, 10.0.26200.x, 10.0.26300.x, 10.0.28000.x) rather than a standalone application CPE, confirming this is an operating-system component issue in the EFS service stack; the code-injection primitive yields full read/write/execute control under the security context the vulnerable component runs in, so the Scope:Unchanged metric still permits total impact to the host.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable EFS code injection by an authorized attacker gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N; code execution yields total C:H/I:H/A:H with no scope change (S:U).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A code injection flaw in Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) affects all supported Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server branches, allowing an attacker with low-level privileges to execute arbitrary code over the network. Because EFS is built into the operating system, unpatched endpoints and servers could suffer full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability, disrupting data protection and business operations. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but a vendor patch is available, making prioritized remediation the key risk decision for leadership.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99359
GHSA-562f-grgj-pcf9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB