Skip to main content

Windows CSC Service EUVDEUVD-2026-99334

| CVE-2026-83699 HIGH
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-297f-wjmv-g456
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted input to CSC service
  3. Exploit
    Trigger stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121)
  4. Execution
    Overwrite return address and execute code
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have authenticated, low-privileged local code execution on the target host (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) and the ability to interact with the Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) service, the component responsible for Offline Files caching of network shares. There is no remote vector and no user interaction is required once local access is obtained (UI:N). The principal limiting factors are the need for a prior local foothold (standard user account or code execution) and the requirement that the CSC/Offline Files service be running and reachable by the attacker's process; the flaw cannot be triggered across the network on its own. No non-default configuration is explicitly stated as required in the description.

Impact

This is a genuine but second-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw: the attacker must already have authenticated, low-privileged code execution on the host (PR:L), so this is not a remote entry point but a post-compromise privilege-gain primitive. The full-triad impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) and SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' agree that successful exploitation yields complete control of the system, which is why it scores 7.8 (High). Countervailing signals lower the real-world urgency: SSVC reports Exploitation 'none' and Automatable 'no', there is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC identified, and EPSS was not provided. These signals are mutually consistent rather than conflicting - a local-only, non-automatable EoP with no observed exploitation and total impact. The practical risk is that this becomes a reliable local privilege-escalation building block once an attacker has a foothold (phishing, commodity malware, or a chained RCE), rather than an internet-facing emergency. Missing data to note: no EPSS score was supplied and KEV/POC status is simply 'not present in input', which is an absence of evidence, not confirmed absence of exploit code.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (for example via a phishing payload or a compromised standard user account) invokes the Client-Side Caching (CSC) service with crafted input that overflows a stack buffer, overwriting the return address to run attacker-controlled code in the service's privileged context. This yields a full local escalation to SYSTEM-level privileges. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and because the CVSS vector is local (AV:L) this cannot be triggered remotely without a prior foothold.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

A stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) in the Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) service - the component that implements Offline Files caching of network shares - allows an authenticated, low-privileged local attacker to corrupt stack memory inside a service that normally runs with SYSTEM privileges, resulting in full local privilege escalation (CVSS 7.8, AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H). The attack requires a pre-existing local foothold (a standard user account or low-privileged code execution) plus the ability to reach and interact with the CSC service; there is no remote vector and no user interaction needed once local access exists. Exploitation is not confirmed active (CISA SSVC reports Exploitation: none) and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so this is a genuine but second-tier priority for patching cadence. Microsoft has released fixes covering Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for this CVE as documented in the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83699), which is the vendor-released patch covering all affected builds; the minimum fixed builds per platform are 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607/Windows Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809/Windows Server 2019, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2 and 22H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2 and 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 6.2.9200.26434 for Windows Server 2012, and 6.3.9600.23470 for Windows Server 2012 R2. Because the flaw is only reachable after an attacker has already obtained low-privileged local code execution, the highest-value compensating control is to eliminate that pre-condition: enforce least privilege so users are not local administrators, restrict interactive logon and RDP access to hosts running CSC, and tightly control which binaries can execute on endpoints (WDAC/AppLocker). Where Offline Files is not a business requirement, stopping and disabling the CSC (Offline Files) service removes the vulnerable surface entirely, at the cost of losing offline access to network shares and any sync behavior; if the service is required, restrict the accounts permitted to log on locally to those hosts so the local-foothold prerequisite is harder to satisfy, and verify with your patch-management tooling that the specific build numbers above are installed rather than relying on cumulative-update naming. Offline Files registry-based Group Policy (“Allow or Disallow use of the Offline Files feature”) can be used to disable the feature fleet-wide as a temporary measure, but note that it will break cached-share access for mobile users until the patch is deployed.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause class is CWE-121, stack-based buffer overflow: a fixed-length stack buffer in the CSC service is written past its bounds, allowing an attacker-controlled payload to overwrite adjacent stack data including return addresses or saved pointers, which the attacker can leverage to redirect execution within the service's security context. The Client-Side Caching (CSC) service backs the Offline Files feature, maintaining a local cache of files from network shares (traditionally under %SystemRoot%\CSC) and exposing a local interface that client processes use to enumerate, pin, sync, and query cached entries; because the service runs as SYSTEM, memory corruption there is a direct path to kernel-adjacent privilege escalation. The CVSS vector AV:L/PR:L/UI:N confirms the flaw is triggered locally by a process the attacker already controls, with no network attack surface and no victim interaction, and the assessed vector matches this exactly. Notably, the SSVC assessment marks Automatable as 'no' and Technical Impact as 'total', meaning the primitive is highly valuable once achieved but does not lend itself to scripted, hands-off mass exploitation - consistent with a bug that needs a local foothold and a purpose-built trigger rather than a spray-and-pray payload.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local-only EoP requiring an existing low-privileged account (AV:L, PR:L); straightforward trigger (AC:L), no UI, and a stack overflow in a privileged service yields full C/I/A impact within the same host (S:U).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege-escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows Client-Side Caching (Offline Files) can allow an attacker who already has a standard user account on an endpoint to gain SYSTEM-level control of that machine. Because the affected component is present across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012-2025, any organization with unpatched endpoints and local user access-especially shared workstations, VDI, and Remote Desktop hosts-faces elevated risk of credential theft, lateral movement, and ransomware staging. Leadership should prioritize patching because the vulnerability offers a direct path from a low-privilege foothold to full system compromise, even though no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 71% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows client/server component present across all supported Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation More Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy