Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malformed public/no-secret keyset
-
DeliverySubmit to app using NewHandleWithNoSecrets/ReadWithNoSecrets
-
ExploitValidate() bypass accepts invalid handle
-
ExecutionDownstream jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle processes invalid keyset
-
ImpactProduce misleading JWK set / integrity assumption broken
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Hardware access control granularity
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the target application load a keyset through the specific APIs keyset.NewHandleWithNoSecrets() or keyset.ReadWithNoSecrets() AND that the keyset source be attacker-influenced (e.g., an externally-provided public keyset). The affected version is tink-go through 2.8.0. The key limiting factor is that applications using the standard secret-bearing keyset handle APIs, or that independently validate keysets, are not exposed; impact is bounded to integrity of the resulting handle (malformed keyset accepted, e.g., enabled public key lacking a valid primary, or a DESTROYED key with no KeyData) and the correctness of downstream consumers such as jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle(). No secret key material is exposed and there is no code-execution or availability impact. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but low-to-moderate severity integrity/validation flaw rather than a high-impact priority. The input CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated issue, but the only impact metric set is VI:L - low integrity impact, with confidentiality (VC:N) and availability (VA:N) explicitly unaffected - yielding a modest 6.9. The actual defect is a missing structural Validate() call that lets malformed public/no-secret keysets be accepted; it does not disclose secret key material or grant code execution. POC exists (the upstream tink-go issue), but there is NO CISA KEV listing and NO EPSS score provided, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. The AV:N rating is conditional: exploitation only matters if an application ingests attacker-supplied keysets through NewHandleWithNoSecrets()/ReadWithNoSecrets(), which is a specific deployment pattern rather than a universal exposure - verify whether your application accepts externally-sourced keysets. Net: real defensive-depth bug worth patching on a normal cycle, not an emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An application loads an externally-supplied public/no-secret keyset via keyset.NewHandleWithNoSecrets() or ReadWithNoSecrets() and treats successful handle construction as proof of keyset integrity. An attacker submits a malformed keyset - e.g., an enabled public key with no valid primary, or a DESTROYED key lacking KeyData - which is accepted without validation and then processed by downstream code such as jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle(), producing an inconsistent or misleading JWK set. Publicly available POC/discussion exists in the upstream tink-go issue tracker. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026
Malformed keyset acceptance in Tink-Go through 2.8.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass structural validation via keyset.NewHandleWithNoSecrets() or ReadWithNoSecrets(), causing malformed public or no-secret keysets (e.g., an enabled key without a valid primary, or a DESTROYED key with no KeyData) to be accepted. This integrity flaw can mislead downstream consumers such as jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle() into producing a JWK set from an invalid handle. Publicly available exploit code exists, but no active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been confirmed; the impact is limited to integrity with no secret disclosure or code execution.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch has been identified at the time of analysis. As an immediate mitigation, avoid using keyset.NewHandleWithNoSecrets() and keyset.ReadWithNoSecrets() to load keysets from untrusted or attacker-influenced sources; instead, use keyset.NewHandle() or keyset.Read(), which perform structural validation-though these require secret material to be present and may not be suitable for public-only keysets. Alternatively, manually invoke keyset.Validate() on the keyset before constructing a handle with the NoSecrets APIs; this requires implementing and maintaining validation logic that mirrors Tink's internal checks. Applications should not rely on successful handle construction as proof of keyset integrity; add independent validation of keyset structure, especially before passing to downstream consumers like jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle(). Restrict keyset inputs to trusted sources and consider using authenticated channels for keyset distribution. Monitor the vendor's GitHub repository (https://github.com/tink-crypto/tink-go/issues/68) for a patch and refer to the VulnCheck advisory (https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/tink-go-keyset-validation-bypass-via-newhandlewithnosecrets) for updates. Trade-offs: using secret-bearing APIs may require storing secrets unnecessarily; manual validation requires custom code and may miss future invariant changes.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Tink-Go is a Go implementation of the Tink cryptographic library. It uses keyset.Handle objects to manage collections of keys along with metadata such as the primary key and key status (e.g., ENABLED, DESTROYED). The library provides a Validate() method that enforces keyset invariants-for example, if any enabled key exists, a valid primary key must be designated, and non-DESTROYED keys must contain valid KeyData. The vulnerable APIs keyset.NewHandleWithNoSecrets() and keyset.ReadWithNoSecrets() are intended to load public or no-secret keysets without requiring secret material, but they erroneously omit the structural Validate() call before constructing the handle. This is a CWE-1286 (Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input) issue, where malformed keysets that violate syntactic invariants are accepted. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:tink-crypto:tink-go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates that all versions up to and including 2.8.0 are affected. Downstream functions like jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle() rely on the handle’s integrity and may produce a JWK set from an invalid keyset, potentially misrepresenting key material to applications that assume successful handle construction implies validity.
Know when Tink Go gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Attacker-supplied keyset is typically network-sourced (AV:N) with no auth or interaction (PR:N/UI:N); only keyset integrity is affected (I:L), with no confidentiality or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
DescriptionCVE.org
Tink-go (tink-crypto/tink-go) through 2.8.0 contains an input-validation vulnerability where keyset.NewHandleWithNoSecrets() and ReadWithNoSecrets() skip the structural Validate() step before constructing a keyset.Handle, allowing malformed public or no-secret keysets that violate Tink's keyset invariants to be accepted. Attackers can supply a malformed keyset, such as one with an enabled public key lacking a valid primary key or a DESTROYED key with no KeyData, causing inconsistent downstream validation where functions like jwt.JWKSetFromPublicKeysetHandle() process the invalid handle and produce a JWK set, potentially misleading applications that rely on successful handle construction as proof of keyset integrity.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-97823
GHSA-5fgm-q74f-6j8f
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB