Skip to main content

UNISOC Modem EUVDEUVD-2026-97142

| CVE-2026-66086 CRITICAL
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-10-12 security@unisoc.com GHSA-x9v2-w4w8-7v7g
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: unisoc
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deploy rogue base station in radio range
  2. Delivery
    Broadcast malformed SIB1 scheduling info
  3. Exploit
    Overflow modem OTA stack parser
  4. Execution
    Execute code in baseband / crash modem
  5. Impact
    Baseband compromise or device DoS

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to transmit a crafted SIB1 (System Information Block Type 1) message with malformed scheduling information over the air, which in practice means operating a rogue cellular base station within radio range and getting the target device to select/camp on that cell during idle cell (re)selection. No authentication, credentials, or user interaction are needed once the device processes the broadcast (consistent with PR:N/UI:N), and the modem processes SIB1 automatically. Limiting factors: the attacker must be in radio proximity with suitable SDR/base-station equipment, must out-compete legitimate cells so the victim camps on the rogue cell, and only devices using the affected UNISOC modem/OTA stack are vulnerable - so this is proximity-gated and targeted rather than remotely scalable.

Impact

The vendor-assigned CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.8 CRITICAL) describes a maximally severe, unauthenticated, no-interaction remote code execution flaw in the UNISOC modem baseband (CWE-121 stack-based buffer overflow). However, these signals must be read against the actual attack surface: the vulnerable input is scheduling information in SIB1 (System Information Block Type 1), which is broadcast by a cell during initial network/cell selection. Realistic exploitation therefore requires the attacker to operate a rogue base station (fake eNodeB/gNodeB) within radio range and induce the target device to camp onto it - this is adjacent/radio-proximity, not arbitrary Internet-routable 'Network' access, so the raw 9.8 overstates remote mass-exploitability. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or widespread automation; this reads as a high-impact but proximity-gated, likely targeted risk rather than a wormable Internet threat. CONFLICTING SIGNAL TO VERIFY: CVSS marks AV:N, but a SIB1/OTA baseband vector implies attacker radio proximity (adjacent) - confirm intended attack vector with UNISOC's bulletin. Net: genuinely dangerous for targeted scenarios (surveillance, border/transit interception), but not a drop-everything mass-exploitation event absent exploit-availability evidence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker sets up a rogue LTE/5G base station near the target and broadcasts a malicious SIB1 message containing malformed scheduling information; when a vulnerable UNISOC-based device performs cell selection and parses the SIB1, the stack-based overflow triggers, yielding remote code execution within the baseband or a modem crash (denial of service) with no user interaction or authentication. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data, so a working chain would require independent baseband reverse-engineering and a software-defined-radio setup.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026

A stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) in the UNISOC modem OTA stack lets an attacker within radio range achieve remote code execution or crash the baseband by broadcasting a crafted SIB1 message whose scheduling information is not properly validated, which the modem parses automatically with no authentication or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N). The vendor assigned a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 with an AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H vector, but the exploitation path is adjacency-gated: the adversary must operate a rogue cellular base station (SDR plus a full baseband stack), out-compete legitimate cells so the victim device camps on the malicious cell during idle-mode (re)selection, and the target must run the affected UNISOC modem/OTA stack - making this a proximity-limited, targeted attack rather than an internet-scale one. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Patch status is not independently confirmed from the supplied data: no exact fixed firmware version is given, and the only reference is the UNISOC product security bulletin (https://www.unisoc.com/en/support/product-security-bulletin/2109454821805424641), which should be consulted to identify the affected chipset list and the corresponding fixed baseband build. Because this is modem firmware, remediation is delivered as a baseband/firmware update from UNISOC through the device OEM or carrier; asset owners should inventory devices by chipset, request the patched firmware from the OEM/carrier, and track baseband build versions rather than OS patch levels. Where an update is not yet available, the practical controls are proximity- and network-oriented rather than software-configurable: on the radio side, carriers should monitor for and locate rogue base stations and IMSI-catcher-style transmitters, since the attack requires an on-air transmitter near the victim with the trade-off that such detection is expensive and coverage-limited; on the device side, administrators of high-value fleets can restrict devices to approved carrier networks and disable automatic cell (re)selection or manual network scanning, accepting the side effect of slower roaming, dropped coverage, and increased support burden; and organizations can treat baseband compromise as an out-of-OS risk by isolating high-value users physically (screened facilities, no devices near unvetted transmitters) and by applying strong segmentation and monitoring on any host reachable from a compromised modem, since a baseband RCE can expose the application processor and its data. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, so targeted rather than broad opportunistic exploitation is the realistic near-term risk.

Affected VersionsENISA

Modem T8100
Modem T9100
Modem UDX710

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CVE-2026-66086 is a stack-based buffer overflow in baseband modem firmware, classified under CWE-121. SIB1 (System Information Block Type 1) is a broadcast message carried on the BCCH that a UE must decode while camped or performing cell selection; it contains cell access parameters and, critically, scheduling information that tells the modem where and when to read other system information blocks. The modem OTA stack copies the scheduling fields from this over-the-air message into a fixed-size stack buffer without adequately validating their length or index values, so a malformed broadcast can overwrite adjacent stack memory. Because SIB1 handling occurs in modem/baseband firmware below the application processor and outside the control of the mobile OS, parsing happens automatically as soon as the device camps on the cell - the user cannot be prompted and the operating system cannot interpose. No CPE identifiers were supplied in the source data, but the affected component is the UNISOC modem OTA/baseband stack, and the vendor's own security bulletin (https://www.unisoc.com/en/support/product-security-bulletin/2109454821805424641) is the authoritative source attributing the flaw to specific UNISOC chipsets.

Know when Unisoc gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (unisoc) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

SIB1 is parsed over the air from a rogue base station requiring radio proximity, so AV:A not AV:N; no auth or interaction (PR:N/UI:N) and full RCE impact on the modem (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (unisoc).

CVSS VectorVendor: unisoc

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

In the modem OTA stack, there is a possible stack-based buffer overflow due to improper validation of scheduling information in SIB1 messages. This could lead to remote code execution or denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical baseband vulnerability in UNISOC modem firmware allows an attacker operating a rogue cellular base station to take control of, or disable, affected devices without any user action - the modem processes the malicious signal automatically. Because the flaw sits below the operating system in the cellular radio stack, standard endpoint security tooling cannot see or stop it, and any fleet of UNISOC-based phones, tablets, vehicles, or connected IoT devices is exposed wherever an adversary can position radio equipment nearby. Leadership should treat this as a targeted, proximity-based threat to device integrity and data confidentiality rather than a broad internet-scale risk, but one with no vendor fix currently available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include disabling 2G/3G fallback and untrusted idle-mode reselection, preferring authenticated 5G standalone networks, restricting or isolating affected devices in high-risk or public environments, network-side rogue base station detection, and escalating to UNISOC/OEM for firmware-level mitigations.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 62% exploitable
Prevalence
High
UNISOC basebands ship in a large share of budget smartphones and IoT globally
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Related Vulnerabilities in Modem Information Disclosure and Buffer Overflow

View all 2

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy