Skip to main content

BigFix Service Management EUVDEUVD-2026-90876

| CVE-2026-67105 HIGH
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information (CWE-319)
2026-10-01 HCL GHSA-xqgc-v2f3-h4v3
7.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: HCL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain internal network foothold
  2. Delivery
    Establish on-path position on backend segment
  3. Exploit
    Intercept unencrypted HTTP between services
  4. Execution
    Extract sensitive data / tamper traffic
  5. Impact
    Credential theft and MitM compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Transport encryption
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have internal network access and an on-path (man-in-the-middle) position on the network segment carrying HTTP traffic between HCL BigFix Service Management backend services, which run that inter-service communication over unencrypted HTTP rather than TLS. Limiting factors: the attacker must be positioned on the relevant internal segment (not remotely over the internet in a practical sense), sensitive data must actually be flowing on that channel during interception, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) reflects the need to achieve and maintain the on-path position. No authentication to the product and no user interaction are required once positioned.

Impact

The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 7.4) rates this HIGH, but the signals pull in different directions. The 'HIGH' score is driven by dual C:H/I:H impact, yet AC:H and the description's own wording ('attacker with internal network access') reveal a significant precondition: the attacker must already hold a privileged on-path position on the internal network segment carrying backend-to-backend traffic. This is not a remote, internet-facing, one-shot exploit despite PR:N/UI:N. Notably, the description describes classic adjacent/on-path man-in-the-middle interception, which conflicts with the vendor's AV:N (network) choice - a true MitM on local backend traffic is better modeled as AV:A (adjacent); verify network exposure with HCL. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC in the provided data, so no evidence of active or automated exploitation exists. SSVC-style reading: exploitation=none observed, automatable=no (requires positioning plus live sensitive traffic), technical impact=total for the intercepted channel. Net: a legitimate hardening/confidentiality issue worth remediating, but the AC:H positioning requirement and absence of exploitation signals place it below internet-facing unauthenticated RCEs in triage priority.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained a foothold on the internal network segment where HCL BigFix Service Management backend services communicate positions themselves on-path (e.g., via ARP spoofing or a compromised host) and passively captures the unencrypted HTTP traffic between those services. They extract sensitive data in transit - credentials, session tokens, or configuration - and can actively tamper with requests/responses to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis; the attack relies on standard network interception tooling rather than a product-specific exploit.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026

Interception of unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an on-path attacker extract sensitive data and enables man-in-the-middle manipulation of that inter-service communication. Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold internal network access and an on-path position on the segment carrying that traffic; no authentication to the product and no user interaction are required once positioned, and the high attack complexity reflects the difficulty of establishing and holding that position. The vendor rates this HIGH (CVSS 3.1 7.4, AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N), while our independent assessment re-scores the attack vector as adjacent (AV:A) because practical exploitation is bounded by the internal-segment requirement; no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Consult HCL support knowledge base article KB0134015 (https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134015) for the vendor's fixed-version guidance, since the available data does not specify an exact patched release and no precise fix version should be assumed; apply the vendor update as soon as it is confirmed for your build. Because the defect is cleartext transmission of inter-service traffic, the most direct compensating control is to enforce TLS on the backend service channel - either by enabling any TLS/listener configuration option the product exposes for inter-service communication, or by wrapping that traffic in an encrypted transport such as an IPsec tunnel or mutual-TLS proxy between service hosts; the trade-off is added certificate lifecycle management, potential latency, and the risk of breaking integrations that are not configured for TLS. Where encryption cannot be enabled immediately, reduce the attack surface by segmenting the backend service network so that inter-service HTTP stays on an isolated VLAN or host-local interface and cannot be reached by general user workstations, and by restricting that segment to the minimum necessary hosts with strict host firewalling; this does not remove the risk from anyone already inside the segment, so it is only a partial mitigation. Additional detection-oriented measures include monitoring for ARP spoofing, rogue DHCP, or unexpected hosts appearing on the service segment, and watching for anomalous service-to-service requests, since a successful on-path attack typically requires network-level manipulation before any data is read or altered.

Affected VersionsENISA

HCL BigFix Service Management Version 27

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-319, Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information: HCL BigFix Service Management backend services exchange data over unencrypted HTTP instead of TLS, so any party that can observe or alter that traffic can read and modify it. Confidentiality and integrity impacts are both rated High (C:H/I:H) because payloads flowing between services may contain credentials, tokens, configuration data, or operational records, and an on-path attacker can both harvest and rewrite those messages for a man-in-the-middle effect; availability is not rated as impacted (A:N). The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:hcl_bigfix_service_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, indicating the advisory does not scope the flaw to a single release line, so all versions should be treated as potentially affected until the vendor's knowledge base article (KB0134015) narrows the range. The divergence between the vendor vector (AV:N) and our assessed vector (AV:A) is a scoping judgement, not a disagreement about impact: because the channel is internal to the deployment and the attacker must sit on the relevant network segment with an on-path position, the attack is better modelled as adjacent-network rather than internet-reachable, and the AC:H rating already reflects the effort of achieving and maintaining that position.

Know when Hcl Bigfix Service Management gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (HCL) PRIMARY 7.4 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.8 MEDIUM

On-path interception of internal backend traffic is adjacent (AV:A) and needs a privileged network position (AC:H); cleartext exposure yields C:H and MitM tampering I:H, with no availability impact.

3.1 AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).

CVSS VectorVendor: HCL

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Insecure Communication vulnerability, which could allow an attacker with internal network access to intercept unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services, enabling the extraction of sensitive data and potential man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

HCL BigFix Service Management, a platform used to manage endpoints and service workflows across the enterprise, transmits traffic between its backend services without encryption, allowing an attacker who is already positioned on the internal network segment to read sensitive data and silently alter that service-to-service communication. Because the product itself does not authenticate or encrypt these internal connections, any compromise of an adjacent host or network device creates a durable foothold for data theft and integrity manipulation. Leadership should care because the affected traffic can expose configuration, asset, and operational data, and manipulation of it could degrade or falsify the reliability of the endpoint management platform that much of IT depends on. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: strictly segment and ACL the internal network paths carrying BigFix Service Management backend traffic; require on-path position to be denied via network access control and monitoring; tunnel or encrypt inter-service HTTP with IPsec/TLS/mTLS proxies; monitor for man-in-the-middle and cleartext data exposure on those segments; restrict administrative and local access to hosts on those segments; and prepare for rapid patch deployment once HCL releases a fix.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise ITSM module within HCL BigFix deployments only
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +37
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2026-56589 HIGH
7.2 Oct 01

Stored cross-site scripting in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker persist malicious script inside the applic

CVE-2026-56592 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Sustained brute-force attacks against the HCL BigFix Service Management v27 login interface are possible because the pro

CVE-2026-56590 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unrestricted file upload in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker submit a crafted file through the product's u

CVE-2026-67101 MEDIUM
5.8 Sep 18

Server-side request forgery in the search functionality of HCL BigFix Service Management allows remote attackers to make

CVE-2026-67171 MEDIUM
5.3 Oct 01

An exposed API endpoint in HCL BigFix Service Management returns sensitive internal database information to remote, unau

CVE-2026-67106 MEDIUM
5.3 Oct 01

Information disclosure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive da

CVE-2026-67104 MEDIUM
5.3 Oct 01

Inspection of publicly served JavaScript in BigFix Service Management lets unauthenticated remote users discover hidden

CVE-2026-56597 MEDIUM
5.3 Sep 18

HCL BigFix Service Management exposes internal IP addresses through its own HTTP responses - response headers, error mes

CVE-2026-21848 MEDIUM
5.0 Sep 18

Cross-tenant data exposure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows an authenticated user with a valid account in one ten

CVE-2025-31980 MEDIUM
4.3 Oct 01

Input validation failures in HCL BigFix Service Management allow remote attackers to inject malformed data into the appl

CVE-2026-56595 MEDIUM
4.3 Sep 18

HCL BigFix Service Management ships with a CORS misconfiguration (CWE-942) in which Origin headers are improperly valida

CVE-2026-21806 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Administrative session hijacking in HCL BigFix Service Management Version 27 stems from the product allowing multiple si

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy