Skip to main content

AzuraCast EUVDEUVD-2026-87821

| CVE-2026-100856 HIGH
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-09-27 VulnCheck GHSA-mvfp-2r94-2mw9
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with RemoteRelays permission
  2. Delivery
    Inject nested #{#{EXPR}} into relay password
  3. Exploit
    Bypass ungreedy cleanUpString regex
  4. Execution
    Payload written to Liquidsoap config
  5. Persist
    Liquidsoap interpolates and executes code
  6. Impact
    Disclose API keys / disrupt station

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated AzuraCast account (<= 0.23.5) holding the RemoteRelays station permission for the target station; the attacker sets the remote relay password field to a nested Liquidsoap interpolation payload (#{#{EXPR}}) that defeats the ungreedy /#{(.*)}/U regex in cleanUpString(). Exploitation does not require a specific non-default feature toggle beyond having remote relay functionality in use, and needs no user interaction. Limiting factors: the RemoteRelays privilege gate (PR:L, not unauthenticated), and that the payload only executes when the Liquidsoap configuration is (re)generated and loaded for the station.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority issue for AzuraCast operators, though gated by authentication. The vendor CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H, 8.7) is internally consistent and I agree with it: network-reachable, low complexity, no user interaction, requiring only the low-privilege RemoteRelays station permission, and yielding full code execution in the Liquidsoap process (high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact). The impact triad is credible because arbitrary Liquidsoap code execution can leak internal API keys and disrupt station streaming. The mitigating signal is PR:L - this is not an unauthenticated flaw; an attacker needs a valid account holding the RemoteRelays permission on a station, which limits exposure to insiders or compromised sub-accounts in multi-tenant deployments. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no separately published weaponized exploit were provided, so there is no evidence of active exploitation; however, the GHSA advisory documents the regex-bypass mechanics and the exact nested payload (#{#{EXPR}}) in PoC-grade detail, so a working exploit is trivially reconstructable. Net: a real code-execution vulnerability that warrants prompt patching, tempered from 'critical/urgent' to 'high but authentication-gated' by the PR:L requirement and the niche deployment footprint of the product.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds (or has phished/compromised) an AzuraCast account with the RemoteRelays station permission edits the remote relay password field, entering a nested Liquidsoap interpolation payload such as #{#{...}} that survives the flawed cleanUpString() sanitizer and lands as valid interpolation inside a double-quoted Liquidsoap output string. When the configuration is written and Liquidsoap evaluates it, the injected expression executes in the Liquidsoap process, allowing the attacker to run arbitrary code, read internal API keys, or knock the station offline. No weaponized exploit code was supplied, but the GHSA advisory lays out the exact bypass and payload structure in detail.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 27, 2026

Code injection in AzuraCast through 0.23.5 lets an authenticated user holding the RemoteRelays station permission inject nested Liquidsoap interpolation syntax (for example #{#{EXPR}}) into the remote relay password field, achieving arbitrary code execution inside the Liquidsoap process, disclosing internal API keys, or disrupting station operation. The root cause is an incomplete migration in ConfigWriter.php from the vulnerable cleanUpString() sanitizer to the safe toRawString() helper; a prior commit (ff49ef4) migrated host, username, mount, name, description, genre, and URL fields but left the password field behind. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exploitation is gated by the RemoteRelays privilege (PR:L) and by the station's Liquidsoap configuration being regenerated and loaded.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to AzuraCast 0.23.6, which incorporates the fix (upstream commit d6b8422fc2c36269df9d1adec89dfbba58828915), and review the vendor advisory at https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/security/advisories/GHSA-q4ph-8x8g-95f8 for release-specific guidance. Because exploitation requires an authenticated account with the RemoteRelays station permission, immediate compensating controls are to remove that permission from untrusted or non-administrative accounts and to audit existing remote relay password fields for suspicious nested interpolation sequences such as #{#{ and for any #{...} payloads - note that a payload only executes when the station's Liquidsoap configuration is regenerated and loaded, so scrubbing the stored password before the next configuration write prevents execution, but stale generated configuration may remain until regeneration. Restricting or disabling remote relays entirely eliminates the attack surface at the cost of losing relay functionality, while restricting permissions may break legitimate station-management workflows. Finally, rotate any internal API keys that were exposed or suspected of exposure if compromise is suspected.

Affected VersionsENISA

AzuraCast 0 <0.23.6

Affected Packages

composer azuracast/azuracast fix: 0.23.6
euvd azuracast fix: 0.23.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in composer, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

AzuraCast generates Liquidsoap configuration files through backend/src/Radio/Backend/Liquidsoap/ConfigWriter.php. The legacy cleanUpString() method attempts to strip Liquidsoap string interpolation using an ungreedy regex '/#{(.*)}/U', which matches the minimum characters up to the first closing brace. Nested input such as #{#{EXPR}} defeats this: the regex consumes #{#{EXPR} and replaces it with the capture group, leaving a lingering closing brace that reconstructs a valid #{EXPR} interpolation expression. Since the remote relay password is written into a Liquidsoap double-quoted string ('password = "' . $password . '"'), double-quoted Liquidsoap strings evaluate #{...} interpolation, so the reconstructed expression is executed by the Liquidsoap process. The safe toRawString() method instead emits Liquidsoap raw strings, which do not evaluate interpolation, and commit ff49ef4 migrated most user-controlled fields to it. This is a CWE-94 code injection issue (improper control of generation of code); the provided CVSS 4.0 vector (CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) is consistent with the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), both reflecting high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact for an authenticated attacker with the RemoteRelays permission.

Know when Azuracast gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable config field, low complexity, requires only the RemoteRelays permission (PR:L) and no user interaction; arbitrary Liquidsoap code execution yields full C/I/A impact within the same process authority (S:U).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 27, 2026 - 03:16 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 27, 2026 - 01:28 cve.org
HIGH 8.7

DescriptionCVE.org

AzuraCast before 0.23.6 contains a code injection vulnerability in the remote relay password field due to incomplete migration from the vulnerable cleanUpString method to toRawString. Attackers with RemoteRelays station permission can inject nested Liquidsoap interpolation syntax to execute arbitrary code in the Liquidsoap process, disclose internal API keys, or disrupt station operation.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code).

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

AzuraCast deployments at or below version 0.23.5 allow an authenticated user holding the RemoteRelays station permission to inject code into the Liquidsoap streaming process that powers station audio. Successful abuse could expose internal API keys and take individual stations offline, and because the permission is granted per-station, the exposure scales with every station on an affected instance whose users are over-provisioned. Leadership should treat this as a high-priority control gap rather than an active incident: no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch is available, making permission hygiene the primary near-term defense.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: revoke or tightly restrict the RemoteRelays station permission to trusted administrators, disable remote relay functionality where not required, rotate internal API keys and Liquidsoap-adjacent credentials, audit Liquidsoap configuration files and process logs for nested #{ interpolation, and filter such payloads at the reverse proxy or WAF layer.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 72% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
self-hosted web-radio automation suite, niche hobbyist/small-broadcaster footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy