Skip to main content

OpenClaw EUVDEUVD-2026-87479

| CVE-2026-100572 MEDIUM
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2026-09-26 VulnCheck GHSA-gcvj-pm5f-x5cv
6.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority availability issue despite the moderate 6.9 CVSS 4.0 score. The vendor vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L) correctly encodes the reality: network-reachable and unauthenticated, but the ONLY impact is partial, temporary availability (VA:L) - no confidentiality or integrity loss. The description explicitly confirms the attacker cannot obtain a valid token or read message data. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so there is no signal of active or likely exploitation. The 6.9 score is somewhat inflated relative to real risk because the outcome is merely that legitimate Synology Chat webhook callbacks are rejected until the rate-limit window expires - a self-healing, channel-scoped nuisance, not a service-wide outage. The PR:N/AC:L rating is technically defensible but understates a real gating factor: exploitation only works in deployments where OpenClaw sits behind a trusted reverse proxy/tunnel that collapses many external clients onto one socket address. In a direct-exposure deployment the per-socket keying would isolate the attacker to their own budget. Bottom line: real but minor, not a patch-tonight emergency.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 26, 2026

Unauthenticated senders can temporarily disable OpenClaw's Synology Chat webhook integration by exhausting a shared invalid-token rate-limit budget on versions 2026.3.25 through 2026.8.1. Because the limiter is applied before authentication and keyed on the raw proxy socket address, any deployment where OpenClaw sits behind a reverse proxy or tunnel causes all external clients to share one counter, so junk webhook calls from a single source can cause legitimate Synology Chat callbacks to be rejected until the rate-limit window resets. The attacker gains no token and no message data - this is a scoped, temporary availability loss (CVSS 4.0 base 6.9, AV:N/PR:N/VA:L) with no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and it is assessed as a genuinely low-priority DoS issue; the vendor-released fix is 2026.8.1.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.8.1 or later, which is the vendor-released fix for this issue; see the GitHub advisory at https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-fw6q-2frm-jxxr and the VulnCheck advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-before-2026.8.1-denial-of-service-via-rate-limit for upgrade guidance. Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to stop untrusted clients from reaching the webhook route at all: restrict inbound access to the Synology Chat webhook path at the reverse proxy, tunnel or edge firewall so that only Synology's published callback source ranges can connect - the trade-off is that any change to those ranges will silently break callbacks until the allowlist is updated. If OpenClaw can be configured to derive the rate-limit key from a trusted forwarded client address (for example via a proxy-protocol or X-Forwarded-For header that only the trusted proxy may set), doing so restores per-client budgets; this must only be enabled when the proxy strips client-supplied versions of those headers, otherwise the limiter becomes trivially spoofable and offers no protection. Raising the invalid-token threshold or shortening the rate-limit window reduces the duration of legitimate-callback rejection but proportionally weakens the abuse protection the limiter was intended to provide, and is therefore only a stopgap. Because exploitation yields no credential or data disclosure, emergency patching is not warranted - treat this as a scheduled maintenance upgrade, prioritize internet-facing or multi-tenant proxy-fronted instances first, and monitor webhook rejection rates as a detection signal for both attacks and allowlist misconfiguration.

Affected VersionsENISA

OpenClaw 2026.3.25 <2026.8.1

Affected Packages

euvd openclaw fix: 2026.8.1

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

OpenClaw exposes a webhook endpoint that accepts inbound callbacks from Synology Chat. Before validating an incoming request's token, the code path applies invalid-token rate limiting, and the limiter's key is the raw peer socket address rather than an authenticated identity or a forwarded client address. This is a CWE-400 uncontrolled resource consumption pattern: a security control that consumes a finite shared budget is placed in front of authentication, and its granularity is coarser than the trust boundary it protects. In typical production topologies OpenClaw is fronted by a trusted reverse proxy or tunnel, so the socket address the application observes is the proxy's address; every external Synology Chat client therefore maps to one rate-limit bucket. An unauthenticated party that can reach the webhook route can fill that bucket with requests carrying invalid tokens, after which the limiter rejects all further callbacks - including legitimate ones - for the duration of the window. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) confirms network reachability, no authentication prerequisite and no confidentiality or integrity impact, with only a low availability effect confined to the vulnerable component. The CPE record cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* and the EUVD affected range (2026.3.25 < 2026.8.1) both point to the OpenClaw application itself, not to Synology Chat, which is only the peer protocol involved.

Know when Openclaw gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 6.9 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Sep 26, 2026 - 03:01 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

OpenClaw versions >= 2026.3.25 and < 2026.8.1 apply invalid-token rate limiting for Synology Chat webhooks before authentication and key the limit on the raw proxy socket address. In deployments where OpenClaw sits behind a trusted reverse proxy or tunnel and multiple external clients share a single socket address, an unauthenticated sender can exhaust the shared invalid-token budget, causing subsequent legitimate Synology Chat webhook callbacks to be rejected until the rate-limit window expires. The attacker cannot obtain a valid token or read message data; the impact is temporary loss of channel availability. Fixed in 2026.8.1.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-28446 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Mar 05

Auth bypass in OpenClaw voice-call extension before 2026.2.1. EPSS 0.68%. PoC and patch available.

CVE-2026-33579 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Mar 31

Privilege escalation in OpenClaw (pre-2026.3.28) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain administrative access b

CVE-2026-32042 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions 2026.2.22 through 2026.2.24 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated att

CVE-2026-32051 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 21

An authorization mismatch vulnerability in OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.3.1 allows authenticated users with operator.

CVE-2026-25253 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 01

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.1.29 automatically establish WebSocket connections to attacker-controlled gateway URLs e

CVE-2026-32846 HIGH POC
8.7 Mar 26

Path traversal in OpenClaw through version 2026.3.23 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files in

CVE-2026-53857 HIGH POC
8.6 Jun 16

Authentication bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.5.3 allows remote attackers with low privileges to receive agent responses

CVE-2026-100530 HIGH POC
8.5 Sep 26

Directory-context bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 allows authenticated attackers with user interaction to reuse an 'a

CVE-2026-32064 HIGH POC
8.5 Mar 21

Unauthenticated access to the noVNC observer interface in OpenClaw's Docker sandbox browser allows anyone who can reach

CVE-2026-32055 HIGH POC
7.6 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions before 2026.2.26 allow authenticated attackers to write arbitrary files outside the workspace director

CVE-2026-32056 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a shell environment variable injection vulnerability in the system.run func

CVE-2026-32049 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 21

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a resource exhaustion vulnerability where the application fails to consiste

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy