Skip to main content

sfturing hosp_order EUVDEUVD-2026-85569

| CVE-2026-96549 LOW
Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information (CWE-312)
2026-09-23 VulDB GHSA-3rr6-p4hr-wxxx
1.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privilege account on host
  2. Exploit
    Locate cleartext-stored sensitive data via CommonUserServiceImpl
  3. Execution
    Read secrets from storage/logs
  4. Impact
    Disclose sensitive information

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Encrypted storage of sensitive data
Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access to the host running sfturing hosp_order with at least a low-privilege authenticated account (CVSS AV:L, PR:L), no user interaction. The sensitive data is exposed because CommonUserServiceImpl.java stores it in cleartext (CWE-312) rather than encrypting or hashing it. Exploitation is limited by the local-only vector - there is no remote/network path - and by the app's rarity; there is no fixed release available since the project ships rolling releases and has not responded to the report.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority issue and the signals are internally consistent. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N, VC:L only, no integrity or availability impact) scores just 1.9, reflecting that an attacker must already have local, authenticated (low-privilege) access to the host to read sensitive data stored in cleartext in CommonUserServiceImpl.java. No EPSS score is provided and there is no CISA KEV listing, so there is no evidence of active or automated exploitation. A public exploit does exist - the flaw was disclosed via GitHub issue #120 and cataloged by VulDB (408951) - but POC availability is not the same as exploitation in the wild, and the local-only attack vector plus low technical impact (single confidentiality leak, no privilege escalation) make weaponization unattractive. The SSVC-style read is: exploitation=public POC, not automatable (requires prior local access), technical impact=partial/low. Real risk is minimal outside of an already-compromised or multi-user host. Note the affected boundary is imprecise: the project uses rolling releases so no fixed version exists, and the vendor has not responded to the report.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privilege local account (or has otherwise gained a foothold) on the host running the hosp_order application reads sensitive data (e.g., credentials or user information) that the CommonUserService persists or logs in cleartext. A public POC exists in the project's GitHub issue tracker (#120), but exploitation yields only disclosure of that stored data - no code execution or privilege gain.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026

sfturing hosp_order stores sensitive information in cleartext in CommonUserServiceImpl.java, allowing a local attacker with a low-privilege authenticated account to read exposed data without user interaction. The issue is a low-severity local confidentiality-only flaw (CVSS 4.0 base score 1.9; independent CVSS 3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) affecting all versions tracked by CPE cpe:2.3:a:sfturing:hosp_order:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*; because the project uses rolling releases and has not responded, no fixed version is available. Publicly available exploit code exists, but there is no CISA KEV confirmation.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; the project has not responded to the issue and rolling releases mean no fixed version can be cited. Until a patch is available, restrict local host access to trusted, low-privilege accounts and avoid shared interactive access; the trade-off is reduced operational convenience. Audit CommonUserServiceImpl.java and any data stores it writes for cleartext sensitive values, replace cleartext with strong hashing for passwords (for example Argon2id or bcrypt) or application-layer encryption and key management for other secrets, and rotate any credentials or tokens found exposed; the trade-off is development effort and potential password resets or key-management complexity. If the affected user-service functionality is not essential, disable or restrict it; the trade-off is loss of account-management features. Monitor https://github.com/sfturing/hosp_order/issues/120 and https://vuldb.com/vuln/408951 for an upstream fix. Since exploitation requires local authenticated access only, perimeter controls are less relevant, but host hardening, endpoint monitoring, and least privilege remain compensating controls.

Affected VersionsENISA

hosp_order 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is CWE-312 (cleartext storage of sensitive information) in the Java service implementation for sfturing hosp_order, specifically ssm_pro/src/main/java/cn/sfturing/service/impl/CommonUserServiceImpl.java. The service writes or retains sensitive values in cleartext instead of applying encryption or hashing, so anyone who can access the host or the process's data can recover them. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P) and the independent CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) both require local access and low privileges, with no impact to integrity or availability and no remote/network vector. CPE data maps the issue to all sfturing hosp_order versions, while the project's rolling-release model prevents a version boundary.

Know when Java gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 1.9 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 3.3 LOW

Local low-privilege actor reads cleartext-stored data, so AV:L/PR:L with confidentiality-only C:L and no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Sep 23, 2026 - 19:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Sep 23, 2026 - 19:22 NVD
4.8 (MEDIUM) 1.9 (LOW)
CVE Published
Sep 23, 2026 - 19:00 cve.org
LOW 1.9

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been found in sfturing hosp_order up to 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file ssm_pro/src/main/java/cn/sfturing/service/impl/CommonUserServiceImpl.java. Such manipulation leads to cleartext storage of sensitive information. The attack can only be performed from a local environment. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 100% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
obscure student/hobby GitHub Java SSM hospital-order app, no enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

More in Java

View all
CVE-2012-4681 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 28

Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m

CVE-2015-7450 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 02

Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti

CVE-2013-2465 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 18

Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent

CVE-2011-3544 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 19

Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug

CVE-2010-1871 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 05

JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to

CVE-2012-1723 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up

CVE-2013-0422 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 10

Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using

CVE-2012-0507 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 07

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up

CVE-2015-4852 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 18

The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers

CVE-2012-5076 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow

CVE-2017-3066 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 27

Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla

CVE-2012-0391 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 08

The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy