Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconObtain low-privilege Octopus Server credentials
-
DeliveryVerify account has external feed modification permission
-
ExploitCraft feed configuration embedding path traversal sequences
-
InstallSubmit modified feed to server API
-
C2Server writes attacker content to arbitrary filesystem path
-
ExecuteOverwritten file executed by server process
-
ImpactRemote code execution as Octopus service account
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid Octopus Server account that has been granted the specific permission to modify non built-in external feeds - this is not a default permission held by all authenticated users, so the attack surface is limited to users or roles that have been explicitly delegated this capability. The path traversal (arbitrary file write) is unconditional once that permission is held. The further escalation to remote code execution additionally requires a deployment configuration where the Octopus Server process has write access to directories containing executables, configuration files loaded at runtime, or interpreted scripts - this is not guaranteed in hardened deployments. Exploitation limits: requires authenticated access, requires the specific external feed permission to be granted, and RCE is conditional on file-system permission layout of the host. Network access to the Octopus Server web interface is required. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N, score 8.7) accurately reflects the core risk: network-accessible exploitation requiring only low privileges (a user account with external feed modification rights), no user interaction, and high impact across all three CIA pillars on the vulnerable system. The RCE impact is conditionally qualified ('in some configurations'), meaning the integrity impact (arbitrary file write) is unconditional, while code execution depends on deployment specifics such as service account write permissions to executable directories, presence of interpreted scripts loaded by the server process, or proximity to startup/config files. There is no EPSS data, KEV listing, or public POC available at time of analysis, which moderates urgency despite the high vendor-assessed score. However, Octopus Server instances commonly hold deployment credentials and production infrastructure access, making any compromise particularly high-consequence. The configuration-dependent RCE path does not reduce the severity of the guaranteed arbitrary file write primitive. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a legitimate Octopus Server account that has been granted 'modify external feeds' permission crafts a feed configuration containing path traversal sequences (e.g., '../../') in a filename or path field, causing the server to write attacker-controlled content to a sensitive location such as a startup script or application plugin directory. If the Octopus Server service account has write access to executable paths, the overwritten file is subsequently loaded or executed by the server process, achieving remote code execution under the server's service identity. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Path traversal in Octopus Server allows an authenticated low-privilege user to overwrite arbitrary files on the server filesystem, which in certain configurations escalates to remote code execution. Affected are three distinct release trains of Octopus Server (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:octopus_deploy:octopus_server). No public exploit or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available across all three affected version ranges.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to the fixed versions released by Octopus Deploy: 2026.2.13344 or later for the 2026.2 train, 2026.1.11725 or later for the 2026.1 train, and 2026.3.11816 or later for the 2026.3 train. The vendor advisory is at https://advisories.octopus.com/post/2026/sa2026-09. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict the 'modify external feeds' permission to the smallest possible set of trusted administrative users, since the vulnerability requires that specific permission. Additionally, run the Octopus Server service under a minimally-privileged account with write access limited to only the directories it legitimately requires, which would not prevent file overwrite within those directories but would block traversal into OS or application binary paths, reducing the conditional RCE risk. Audit existing non built-in external feed configurations for unexpected path components as a detection measure.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Octopus Server (cpe:2.3:a:octopus_deploy:octopus_server) is an enterprise deployment automation platform commonly used in CI/CD pipelines. The vulnerability is rooted in CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory - 'Path Traversal'), occurring in the external feed management subsystem. Octopus Server supports various feed types (NuGet, Docker, Helm, Maven, etc.). The flaw specifically resides in feeds classified as 'non built-in' external feeds, where user-supplied input is used to construct file paths server-side without sufficient sanitisation or canonicalisation. By embedding directory traversal sequences (e.g., '../' components) in feed configuration values, an attacker can cause the server to write controlled content to locations outside the intended directory, up to and including overwriting sensitive OS or application files that, if replaced, could grant code execution.
Know when Octopus Server gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-accessible, low-complexity path traversal requiring low privileges (feed modify permission); no scope change; all three CIA impacts high due to arbitrary file write and conditional RCE.
Primary rating from Vendor (Octopus).
CVSS VectorVendor: Octopus
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user with permission to modify non built-in external feeds could exploit a path traversal flaw to overwrite arbitrary files on the server, which in some configurations could lead to remote code execution.
Executive ViewAI
Octopus Server deployment automation platform contains a path traversal vulnerability affecting three release trains that allows authenticated users to modify system files and deployment configurations, with potential escalation to remote code execution in certain configurations. Organizations relying on Octopus for continuous deployment face risk of unauthorized changes to application deployments and infrastructure code.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
More in Octopus Server
View allIn Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2018.9.x before 2018.9.1, an authenticated user with permission to modify deployment
In Octopus Deploy 2019.1.0 through 2019.3.1 and 2019.4.0 through 2019.4.5, an authenticated user with the VariableViewUn
Server-level configuration changes can be made by any authenticated low-privilege user in Octopus Server through a speci
In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible t
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to bypass rate limiting on login using null bytes. Rated critical
In Octopus Deploy 2018.4.4 through 2018.5.1, Octopus variables that are sourced from the target do not have sensitive va
Path traversal in Octopus Deploy allows removing files and file contents on the host through API manipulation. Enables d
In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for a session token to be valid indefinitely due to improper valid
Authenticated remote code execution in Octopus Server allows any user whose role grants permission to edit an Environmen
Privilege escalation in Octopus Server lets an authenticated user who already holds permission to modify roles weaken a
Incorrect authorization in Octopus Server causes the platform to evaluate multiple scoped permission assignments incorre
Service account impersonation in Octopus Server stems from inconsistent OIDC token issuer validation, allowing a token m
EUVD-2026-80225
GHSA-7f5m-mqg8-7jjg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB