Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege Langflow credentials
-
DeliveryCraft malicious flow build request
-
ExploitSubmit request exploiting authorization bypass
-
ExecutionServer executes attacker-controlled code
-
PersistExfiltrate embedded API keys, credentials, and data
-
ImpactFull server compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session on the IBM Langflow OSS instance - any low-privilege account suffices per the PR:L CVSS metric. The attack specifically targets the flow build process, meaning the attacker must be able to submit flow build requests to the server. No non-default configuration, specific feature enablement, or privileged role is described as a prerequisite beyond basic authenticated access to Langflow. Exploitation is bounded by the requirement for prior authentication; unauthenticated network attackers cannot directly exploit this flaw without first obtaining credentials. |
| Impact | The CVSS 8.8 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately reflects the threat profile: network-reachable, low complexity, requiring only a low-privilege account, and delivering full triad impact. No EPSS score was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified; absent KEV status and public POC, the immediate opportunistic risk is lower than a KEV-listed critical, but the attack is simple enough that even a mid-sized municipal IT team in legnica running Langflow for internal AI workflows should treat this as urgent - any authenticated user, including contractors or low-trust service accounts, can escalate to arbitrary code execution with no further prerequisites. Langflow deployments are particularly high-value targets because flows routinely embed API keys, database credentials, and connections to sensitive data sources; code execution on the Langflow server therefore typically implies secondary access to those assets. The authorization bypass in the build process is architecturally significant: it means the platform's intended trust boundary between user roles is not enforced. No conflicting signals between CVSS and description were identified. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker holding any valid low-privilege Langflow account - for example a contractor account or a compromised internal user - crafts a flow build payload that bypasses the server-side authorization check, injecting executable code into the build process. Because attack complexity is low and no user interaction is required, the attack is straightforward to execute once credentials are in hand. The Langflow server executes the injected code in its runtime context, giving the attacker access to the server environment, embedded secrets, and all data sources connected to the platform. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 04, 2026
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 is reachable by any low-privileged authenticated attacker through an authorization bypass in the platform's flow build process. The flaw (CWE-94, Code Injection) allows a user with minimal credentials to submit flow build requests that exceed their authorized scope, causing the server to execute attacker-supplied code with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code have been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Consult the IBM security advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285640 for the official patched release; no exact fix version number was present in the available intelligence feed, and a specific version cannot be cited here without independent verification. As the primary action, upgrade IBM Langflow OSS to the vendor-recommended patched version once confirmed. As interim compensating controls while a patch window is arranged: restrict Langflow access to the smallest feasible set of fully trusted accounts, revoking or suspending contractor and low-trust credentials immediately; place the Langflow instance behind a VPN or network-layer access control so that only authorized users on trusted networks can reach the flow build endpoint; and audit embedded API keys and credentials stored within existing flows for rotation. Note that restricting user accounts may break legitimate AI workflow operations if those accounts own active flows, so coordinate with workflow owners before revoking access.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM Langflow OSS is a visual AI workflow orchestration platform that enables users to construct and execute data-processing pipelines incorporating large language models, APIs, and other AI components. Flows are essentially executable server-side graphs; the flow build process compiles and runs user-defined logic on the backend. CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code) identifies code injection as the root cause - the authorization layer governing what a low-privilege user may include in a flow build request is bypassable, allowing submission of arbitrary executable logic. The affected range, 1.0.0 through 1.11.2, spans roughly three years of releases per the IBM advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285640. No CPE string was supplied in the intelligence feed; product identity is confirmed from the description and IBM advisory reference alone.
Know when Langflow gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable flow build endpoint requires only low-privilege auth; code injection yields full triad impact with no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (us).
CVSS VectorVendor: us
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an authorization bypass in the flow build process.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 contain a code-injection vulnerability (CWE-94) enabling low-privileged authenticated users to bypass authorization controls and achieve remote code execution with full system compromise. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but any low-privilege Langflow user represents an active insider risk to organizations running shared instances.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict flow creation and code execution to administrators exclusively; (2) Disable or air-gap Langflow deployments processing sensitive data or production workloads; (3) Implement code-execution sandboxing and strict input validation within the platform; (4) Enable comprehensive audit logging with alerting on all flow submissions and execution events; (5) Conduct access audit to remove unnecessary Langflow permissions from all non-administrator accounts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Langflow before 1.3.0 allows unauthenticated remote code injection through the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint, enabling
Langflow has a third RCE vulnerability via exec_globals (EPSS 10.0%) allowing inclusion of untrusted code that executes
Account takeover and remote code execution in Langflow AI workflow platform versions ≤1.6.9 due to a CORS misconfigurati
Langflow has a code injection vulnerability in the code component (EPSS 2.6%) enabling remote code execution through the
Langflow has an eval injection in eval_custom_component_code (EPSS 2.0%) enabling remote code execution through crafted
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary
Code injection in Langflow CSV Agent node before 1.8.0. The node hardcodes allow_dangerous_code=True, enabling arbitrary
Langflow through 0.6.19 allows remote code execution if untrusted users are able to reach the "POST /api/v1/custom_compo
OS command injection in Langflow's MCP stdio transport allows an attacker who can reach the MCP server configuration end
langflow <=1.0.18 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) as any component provided the code functionality and the
langflow v1.0.12 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the PythonCodeTool component.
Langflow before 1.7.0.dev45 exposes multiple API endpoints without authentication, allowing unauthenticated access to us
EUVD-2026-71598
GHSA-qjf8-5fwj-jhh8
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB