Skip to main content

IBM i EUVDEUVD-2026-57520

| CVE-2026-17083 CRITICAL
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)
2026-08-12 ibm GHSA-jw9j-666x-7q6c
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach exposed IBM i network service
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted oversized request
  3. Exploit
    Overflow stack buffer (CWE-787)
  4. Execution
    Overwrite saved return address
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Per CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no authentication and no user interaction are required, and the description provides no configuration precondition - implying remote unauthenticated exploitation against affected IBM i systems that expose the vulnerable (unnamed) network service. The primary limiting factor is exposure: exploitation requires network reachability to whatever IBM i service contains the vulnerable parser, so systems where that service is not enabled or is firewalled off from the attacker are not reachable. Affected releases are constrained to IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6. Because the advisory does not name the specific service or protocol, defenders should verify with IBM (advisory node 7283276) which listener carries the risk before relying on network-level scoping.

Impact

The raw signals point to high priority: CVSS 9.8 with a fully remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) and full C/I/A impact, plus memory-corruption-to-RCE class (CWE-787). However, several real-world risk moderators exist and should temper immediate panic. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. There is no CISA KEV listing and no evidence of a public POC, so this is currently a theoretical/vendor-reported risk rather than an actively exploited one. A key data gap: the description does not identify which network service, port, or configuration exposes the vulnerable code path, so the assumed 'default remote' exposure implied by AV:N/PR:N cannot be independently confirmed - the real attack surface may be narrower (e.g., only reachable if a particular service is enabled/exposed). Net assessment: treat as a high-priority patch given critical scoring and RCE potential, but recognize that active exploitation is not confirmed and exposure depends on which IBM i services are network-reachable in a given environment.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to an exposed IBM i service sends a crafted request whose oversized field overflows a fixed-size stack buffer, overwriting the saved return address and hijacking control flow to execute attacker-supplied code on the host. Because the CVSS vector indicates no authentication and no user interaction, a single unauthenticated packet or session could in principle achieve code execution. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis, so real-world exploitation would currently require independent vulnerability research.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 12, 2026

Remote code execution in IBM i (formerly OS/400) versions 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 arises from a stack-based buffer overflow that lets a remote attacker run arbitrary code on the host operating system. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates unauthenticated network exploitation with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, scoring 9.8 (Critical). IBM has published a fix, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the IBM-provided fix (Program Temporary Fixes / PTFs) for your specific release as documented at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283276, covering IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 - the input does not list exact PTF numbers, so obtain them from that advisory. Because the vulnerable network service is not named in the available data, effective compensating controls until PTFs are applied include restricting network reachability of IBM i host services to trusted management networks via firewall/host access rules, disabling or limiting any non-essential IBM i network servers/subsystems that are not required, and monitoring for anomalous connections or crashes of exposed services; the trade-off is that disabling a required IBM i server (for example a remote command, file, or database listener) can break dependent applications, so validate service dependencies before turning anything off. Prioritize patching over workarounds given the critical RCE rating.

Affected VersionsENISA

i 7.5
i 7.3
i 7.6
i 7.4

Affected Packages

euvd i no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM i is IBM's integrated operating environment running on Power Systems hardware, historically used for line-of-business transaction workloads (ERP, banking, insurance, manufacturing) that were formerly on AS/400 and iSeries. The root cause is CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write), specifically a stack-based buffer overflow: attacker-controlled input exceeds the bounds of a fixed-size stack buffer, corrupting adjacent stack memory such as saved return addresses, which can be leveraged to redirect execution flow and run attacker code. The CPE (cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:*) confirms the affected component is the IBM i operating system platform itself rather than a bolt-on application, meaning the exposed code path is likely a network-facing OS service or subsystem, though the advisory does not name the specific listening service or protocol.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Vendor vector describes unauthenticated remote RCE via stack overflow with full host impact; AV:N/PR:N/UI:N retained though the exposed service is unnamed, keeping AC:L as reported.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM i systems (versions 7.3-7.6) are exposed to remote takeover by unauthenticated attackers with no user interaction required, putting mission-critical enterprise infrastructure at immediate risk of complete system compromise. The vulnerability enables attackers to seize full control of affected systems from the network, threatening business operations, data confidentiality, and system availability. IBM has released a patch that must be deployed urgently across all affected instances.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 62% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise OS on IBM Power, common in finance/insurance/manufacturing, not universal
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy