Skip to main content

FortiOS FortiProxy FortiPAM EUVDEUVD-2026-57191

| CVE-2026-71407 HIGH
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-08-12 fortinet GHSA-32v4-7g7v-4c6p
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (fortinet) PRIMARY
MEDIUM
qualitative
NVD
8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI
8.1 HIGH

AV:N for network socket attack; AC:H for mandatory ASLR and stack-canary bypass plus specific Kerberos+SOCKS prerequisite; PR:N since no credentials needed; C/I/A:H for full WAD daemon compromise.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

7
Analysis Updated
Sep 08, 2026 - 21:16 vuln.today
v2 (cvss_changed)
Re-analysis Queued
Sep 08, 2026 - 21:08 vuln.today
cvss_changed
Severity Changed
Sep 08, 2026 - 21:08 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Sep 08, 2026 - 21:08 NVD
5.6 (MEDIUM) 8.1 (HIGH)
CVSS changed
Aug 12, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
5.1 (MEDIUM) 5.6 (MEDIUM)
Analysis Generated
Aug 12, 2026 - 13:16 vuln.today
CVE Published
Aug 12, 2026 - 12:19 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.1

DescriptionNVD

A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands in the context of the WAD daemon via crafted sockets, only if the explicit proxy is configured with Kerberos authentication and SOCKS enabled.

AnalysisAI

Stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiPAM allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands within the WAD (Web Application Daemon) process via crafted sockets - but only on devices where the explicit proxy is simultaneously configured with Kerberos authentication and SOCKS enabled. Exploitation further requires defeating stack canary protection and ASLR, elevating real-world attack complexity well above the raw CVSS base score implies. No public exploit or active exploitation has been confirmed; Fortinet PSIRT published advisory FG-IR-26-161 disclosing the issue.

Technical ContextAI

The WAD daemon is Fortinet's Web Application Daemon responsible for explicit proxy processing, SSL/TLS inspection, and application-layer filtering across FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiPAM. CWE-121 (Stack-Based Buffer Overflow) indicates a fixed-size stack buffer is overwritten during socket data processing in the explicit proxy code path - specifically the intersection of Kerberos authentication handling and SOCKS proxy negotiation. The CPE strings (cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortios, cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortipam, cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy) confirm all three product lines share the vulnerable WAD codebase. The CVE description explicitly states that stack protection (canaries) and ASLR must be bypassed, meaning the binary has modern mitigations compiled in - exploitation requires either a separate information-disclosure primitive to leak addresses or a ROP/heap-spray technique to defeat ASLR.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory FG-IR-26-161 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-161) - upgrade FortiOS beyond 7.6.6, FortiProxy beyond 7.0.23 / 7.2.16 / 7.4.11 / 7.6.4, and FortiPAM beyond the respective 1.x affected ceilings per the advisory; exact fixed release numbers should be verified directly from the Fortinet PSIRT page. As an immediate compensating control, disabling either Kerberos authentication or SOCKS support on the explicit proxy configuration eliminates the exploitable code path - removing either condition is sufficient, though this may break dependent proxy authentication workflows that rely on Kerberos SSO. If neither can be disabled, restrict network access to the proxy ports via perimeter ACLs or firewall policy to limit the attacker population, accepting that this reduces but does not eliminate exposure.

CVE-2022-40684 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 18

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an

CVE-2024-55591 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote

CVE-2024-21762 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 09

A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0

CVE-2023-27997 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 13

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi

CVE-2020-12812 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 24

FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication

CVE-2016-1909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 15

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0

CVE-2016-6909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 24

Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9

CVE-2025-25249 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 13

Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiOS (6.4 through 7.6.3) and FortiSwitchManager (7.0.x/7.2.x) lets an attacker run

CVE-2015-1880 MEDIUM POC
4.3 May 12

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sslvpn login page in Fortinet FortiOS 5.2.x before 5.2.3 allows remote a

CVE-2025-24472 HIGH
8.1 Feb 11

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers with knowledge of upstream/do

CVE-2025-68686 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Feb 10

An Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability [CWE-200] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS

CVE-2019-6693 MEDIUM
6.5 Nov 21

Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to cipher sensitive data in FortiOS configuration backup file may allow an attacke

Share

EUVD-2026-57191 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy