Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconIdentify GlassFish behind reverse proxy
-
DeliveryCraft chunked HTTP request with malformed trailer header
-
ExploitSend to front-end proxy
-
InstallProxy forwards as single request
-
C2Grizzly misparses trailer boundary as new request
-
ExecuteSmuggled payload prepended to next victim request
-
ImpactAttacker content processed under victim's session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service HTTP request consistency
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation is most effective when GlassFish with a vulnerable Grizzly version is deployed behind a reverse proxy or load balancer (e.g., nginx, HAProxy, Apache httpd) that forwards HTTP/1.1 chunked requests - this is the architectural condition implied by the CVSS 4.0 AT:P (Attack Requirements: Present) flag. The attacker must be able to send HTTP/1.1 requests with chunked transfer-encoding and a trailer section containing a malformed header line; standard non-chunked requests are not affected. No authentication is required (PR:N in CVSS vector). Exploitation is limited by the need for the proxy and Grizzly to parse the malformed trailer boundary differently; in direct-access deployments without a proxy, the smuggling primitive is weakened, though parser anomalies may still occur. No specific non-default configuration option is documented as a prerequisite. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 score of 6.3 with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N reflects network reachability without authentication, but the AT:P (Attack Requirements: Present) flag depresses the score significantly - effective HTTP request smuggling requires a specific intermediary topology (a proxy or load balancer in the request path that interprets chunked trailers differently from Grizzly). The 'Information Disclosure' tag in the intelligence data is in mild tension with VC:N in the CVSS vector; request smuggling can enable session hijacking and response poisoning that yields confidentiality impact in practice, but this is not formally reflected in the provided scoring. The absence of KEV listing and any POC reference suggests no active or widespread exploitation at time of analysis. Real-world priority is highest for GlassFish deployments behind a reverse proxy handling untrusted chunked HTTP/1.1 traffic; deployments where GlassFish is directly internet-exposed without a proxy reduce the smuggling vector but retain the parser anomaly. EPSS data was not provided in the input - exploitation probability cannot be quantified. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted HTTP/1.1 request with chunked transfer-encoding and a deliberately malformed trailer header line to a reverse proxy fronting a GlassFish server. The proxy treats the entire payload as one request and forwards it, while Grizzly - due to the parser flaw - splits it into two at the malformed trailer boundary. The second, attacker-crafted segment is then processed by GlassFish as the opening of the next legitimate user's request, allowing the attacker to prepend arbitrary HTTP content to that user's session, potentially hijacking authentication tokens or invoking privileged endpoints on their behalf. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
HTTP request smuggling in Eclipse Grizzly before 5.0.2 stems from the framework's inability to correctly parse malformed trailer header lines in chunked HTTP requests, enabling CWE-444 boundary-confusion attacks. Remote unauthenticated attackers who can send crafted chunked requests through a front-end proxy to a GlassFish-backed server can cause the proxy and Grizzly to disagree on request boundaries, smuggling attacker-controlled content as the prefix of a subsequent legitimate user's request. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing have been identified at time of analysis, though the CVSS 4.0 AT:P condition signals that specific deployment prerequisites must be met.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Eclipse Grizzly to version 5.0.2 or later, as stated in the CVE description as the fixed release. GlassFish operators should update to the GlassFish distribution that bundles Grizzly 5.0.2 or later; the exact corresponding GlassFish fix version is not confirmed from available data and must be verified via the Eclipse advisory at https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/129. Where immediate patching is not possible, deploy a strict front-end proxy or WAF configured to normalize chunked transfer-encoding and reject or strip malformed trailer headers before forwarding to GlassFish - note this adds processing overhead and may interfere with legitimate use of HTTP trailers (e.g., gRPC trailing metadata). Restricting chunked-encoding with trailers at the network perimeter is a narrower control with fewer side effects if the application does not rely on trailer functionality.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Eclipse Grizzly is a Java NIO-based HTTP server framework that functions as the embedded HTTP connector for Eclipse GlassFish. The flaw is classified under CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests - HTTP Request Smuggling): when an HTTP/1.1 chunked message includes a trailer section with a malformed header line, Grizzly's parser fails to correctly identify the request boundary. A front-end reverse proxy that parses the same message differently then forwards a byte stream that Grizzly interprets as two separate HTTP requests - one legitimate and one injected by the attacker. The affected CPE cpe:2.3:a:eclipse_foundation:eclipse_glassfish:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms Eclipse GlassFish as the affected product family, with Grizzly being its HTTP layer; the CVE description names Grizzly specifically as the component containing the parser defect.
Know when Eclipse Glassfish gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Requires proxy-backend topology for effective smuggling (AC:H); scope changes as attacker affects other users' sessions (S:C); limited confidentiality and integrity impact align with request smuggling primitives.
Primary rating from Vendor (eclipse).
CVSS VectorVendor: eclipse
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Eclipse Grizzly in versions before 5.0.2, cannot properly parse the trailer section in malformed trailer header's line, which can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
HTTP request smuggling exploits inconsistencies in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP message boundaries.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Eclipse Glassfish
View allServer-Side Request Forgery combined with CSRF in Eclipse GlassFish's DownloadServlet ContentSources handler allows a re
Remote code execution in Eclipse GlassFish allows remote attackers to evaluate arbitrary Expression Language (EL) expres
Remote code execution in Eclipse GlassFish allows attackers with administrative access to the Administration Console to
EUVD-2026-43641
GHSA-c269-4hpf-qfhc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB