Skip to main content

Eclipse Grizzly CVE-2026-12606

| EUVDEUVD-2026-43641 MEDIUM
HTTP Request/Response Smuggling (CWE-444)
2026-07-14 eclipse GHSA-c269-4hpf-qfhc
6.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: eclipse
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Identify GlassFish behind reverse proxy
  2. Delivery
    Craft chunked HTTP request with malformed trailer header
  3. Exploit
    Send to front-end proxy
  4. Install
    Proxy forwards as single request
  5. C2
    Grizzly misparses trailer boundary as new request
  6. Execute
    Smuggled payload prepended to next victim request
  7. Impact
    Attacker content processed under victim's session

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service HTTP request consistency
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation is most effective when GlassFish with a vulnerable Grizzly version is deployed behind a reverse proxy or load balancer (e.g., nginx, HAProxy, Apache httpd) that forwards HTTP/1.1 chunked requests - this is the architectural condition implied by the CVSS 4.0 AT:P (Attack Requirements: Present) flag. The attacker must be able to send HTTP/1.1 requests with chunked transfer-encoding and a trailer section containing a malformed header line; standard non-chunked requests are not affected. No authentication is required (PR:N in CVSS vector). Exploitation is limited by the need for the proxy and Grizzly to parse the malformed trailer boundary differently; in direct-access deployments without a proxy, the smuggling primitive is weakened, though parser anomalies may still occur. No specific non-default configuration option is documented as a prerequisite.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 6.3 with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N reflects network reachability without authentication, but the AT:P (Attack Requirements: Present) flag depresses the score significantly - effective HTTP request smuggling requires a specific intermediary topology (a proxy or load balancer in the request path that interprets chunked trailers differently from Grizzly). The 'Information Disclosure' tag in the intelligence data is in mild tension with VC:N in the CVSS vector; request smuggling can enable session hijacking and response poisoning that yields confidentiality impact in practice, but this is not formally reflected in the provided scoring. The absence of KEV listing and any POC reference suggests no active or widespread exploitation at time of analysis. Real-world priority is highest for GlassFish deployments behind a reverse proxy handling untrusted chunked HTTP/1.1 traffic; deployments where GlassFish is directly internet-exposed without a proxy reduce the smuggling vector but retain the parser anomaly. EPSS data was not provided in the input - exploitation probability cannot be quantified.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted HTTP/1.1 request with chunked transfer-encoding and a deliberately malformed trailer header line to a reverse proxy fronting a GlassFish server. The proxy treats the entire payload as one request and forwards it, while Grizzly - due to the parser flaw - splits it into two at the malformed trailer boundary. The second, attacker-crafted segment is then processed by GlassFish as the opening of the next legitimate user's request, allowing the attacker to prepend arbitrary HTTP content to that user's session, potentially hijacking authentication tokens or invoking privileged endpoints on their behalf.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026

HTTP request smuggling in Eclipse Grizzly before 5.0.2 stems from the framework's inability to correctly parse malformed trailer header lines in chunked HTTP requests, enabling CWE-444 boundary-confusion attacks. Remote unauthenticated attackers who can send crafted chunked requests through a front-end proxy to a GlassFish-backed server can cause the proxy and Grizzly to disagree on request boundaries, smuggling attacker-controlled content as the prefix of a subsequent legitimate user's request. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing have been identified at time of analysis, though the CVSS 4.0 AT:P condition signals that specific deployment prerequisites must be met.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Eclipse Grizzly to version 5.0.2 or later, as stated in the CVE description as the fixed release. GlassFish operators should update to the GlassFish distribution that bundles Grizzly 5.0.2 or later; the exact corresponding GlassFish fix version is not confirmed from available data and must be verified via the Eclipse advisory at https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/129. Where immediate patching is not possible, deploy a strict front-end proxy or WAF configured to normalize chunked transfer-encoding and reject or strip malformed trailer headers before forwarding to GlassFish - note this adds processing overhead and may interfere with legitimate use of HTTP trailers (e.g., gRPC trailing metadata). Restricting chunked-encoding with trailers at the network perimeter is a narrower control with fewer side effects if the application does not rely on trailer functionality.

Affected VersionsENISA

Eclipse GlassFish 4.0.0 ≤4.0.2
Eclipse GlassFish 5.0.0 <5.0.2

Affected Packages

euvd eclipse_glassfish fix: 5.0.2

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Eclipse Grizzly is a Java NIO-based HTTP server framework that functions as the embedded HTTP connector for Eclipse GlassFish. The flaw is classified under CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests - HTTP Request Smuggling): when an HTTP/1.1 chunked message includes a trailer section with a malformed header line, Grizzly's parser fails to correctly identify the request boundary. A front-end reverse proxy that parses the same message differently then forwards a byte stream that Grizzly interprets as two separate HTTP requests - one legitimate and one injected by the attacker. The affected CPE cpe:2.3:a:eclipse_foundation:eclipse_glassfish:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms Eclipse GlassFish as the affected product family, with Grizzly being its HTTP layer; the CVE description names Grizzly specifically as the component containing the parser defect.

Know when Eclipse Glassfish gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (eclipse) PRIMARY 6.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Requires proxy-backend topology for effective smuggling (AC:H); scope changes as attacker affects other users' sessions (S:C); limited confidentiality and integrity impact align with request smuggling primitives.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (eclipse).

CVSS VectorVendor: eclipse

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Jul 14, 2026 - 11:17 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Eclipse Grizzly in versions before 5.0.2, cannot properly parse the trailer section in malformed trailer header's line, which can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
GlassFish is a niche Java EE server with limited modern enterprise footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

HTTP request smuggling exploits inconsistencies in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP message boundaries.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy