Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local admin or Directory Manager credentials
  2. Delivery
    Craft LDIF with trailing-semicolon attribute types
  3. Exploit
    Execute database import (ldif2db)
  4. Execution
    Trigger heap out-of-bounds read in LDIF parser
  5. Impact
    Read limited adjacent heap memory contents

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires three simultaneous conditions: (1) local system access (AV:L) - remote network triggering is not possible per the CVSS vector; (2) high privileges (PR:H) - the attacker must hold administrative credentials sufficient to invoke LDIF database import operations, such as root or the 'cn=Directory Manager' account; (3) high attack complexity (AC:H) - the specific LDIF input must include attribute types with trailing semicolons and may require additional conditions to produce a meaningful read. The trigger is specifically the LDIF database import code path, not general LDAP query handling, meaning the vulnerability is not reachable through normal client LDAP operations. Exploitation is further limited by the read-only nature of the impact (no write or execution primitive) and the 'detectable under memory instrumentation' qualifier, which suggests unreliable behavior in hardened production deployments. RHEL's default SELinux enforcement provides additional isolation for the ns-slapd process.

Impact

The compound signal picture here is unambiguous: this is a genuinely low-risk finding. The CVSS 1.9 score (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) requires local access, high complexity, and administrator-level privileges - meaning an attacker already in a highly trusted position on the system. The sole impact is C:L (minor confidentiality loss), with no integrity or availability consequences. There is no EPSS data provided in the source intelligence, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC. The description's qualifier - 'detectable under memory instrumentation' - further suggests the read may not produce exploitable, deterministic behavior in production; it may manifest only as a crash or silent over-read without meaningful data disclosure. SSVC signals align: exploitation status is none, automatable is no (high complexity, local vector), and technical impact is partial at best. Defenders should not treat this as an urgent remediation item unless directory server administrators are part of a specific insider threat model or the environment runs memory-sanitized builds for compliance.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A system administrator or a threat actor who has already achieved root or directory-admin privileges on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux host crafts a malformed LDIF file containing attribute type descriptors with trailing semicolons, then initiates a database import operation against the 389 Directory Server instance. The LDIF parser reads past the end of a heap buffer, potentially exposing a small amount of adjacent heap memory. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; reliable exploitation in production (without memory instrumentation) may require additional heap grooming to position sensitive data adjacent to the parser buffer.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Out-of-bounds read in 389 Directory Server's LDIF parser exposes limited heap memory to a highly privileged local attacker during database import operations. Exploitation requires local system access, high attack complexity, and high privileges (administrator-level), producing only minor confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability consequences. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and no KEV listing; the CVSS score of 1.9 reflects the extremely constrained exploitation conditions, making this a low operational priority absent specific threat model considerations.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is independently confirmed from the available source data; monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11786 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2485426 for fix availability and errata releases. Given the exploitation conditions (AV:L/PR:H), the primary compensating control is restricting who can perform LDIF database import operations - specifically, limiting 'ldif2db' and related import tooling to a dedicated, audited service account and avoiding import of LDIF files from untrusted or unvalidated sources. Organizations running 389-ds-base under memory-instrumented builds (e.g., ASAN-enabled QA or compliance environments) may observe crashes on malformed LDIF; a workaround is to validate LDIF syntax with a linting tool before import. Since the impact is limited to read-only confidentiality with no integrity or availability effect, runtime mitigations such as SELinux confinement of the 'ns-slapd' process already present on RHEL systems provide meaningful defense-in-depth. No significant operational trade-off is introduced by existing RHEL SELinux policies.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

389 Directory Server is Red Hat's open-source LDAP server implementation, distributed as part of Red Hat Directory Server (versions 11, 12, 13) and as the 389-ds-base package bundled with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10. LDIF (LDAP Data Interchange Format) is the standard text format for representing LDAP directory entries, used during bulk database import operations via tools such as 'db2ldif' or 'ldif2db'. The CWE-125 root cause (Out-of-Bounds Read) manifests in the attribute type tokenizer: when an attribute descriptor carries a trailing semicolon - a valid LDIF construct used to denote attribute options - the parser advances its read pointer past the allocated heap buffer boundary without a proper length check. The description explicitly notes this is 'detectable under memory instrumentation,' indicating the bug surfaces reliably under AddressSanitizer (ASAN) or Valgrind but may not produce observable, reliable reads in uninstrumented production deployments. CPE strings confirm impact across all major RHDS and RHEL variants currently in Red Hat's support lifecycle.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
SUSE 5.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Red Hat 1.9 LOW

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Jun 12, 2026 - 18:52 NVD
LOW MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Jun 12, 2026 - 18:52 NVD
1.9 (LOW) 6.5 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionNVD

A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The LDIF parser reads past the end of a heap buffer when processing attribute types with trailing semicolons during database import, causing an out-of-bounds read detectable under memory instrumentation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 99% exploitable
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Affected Products (CPE)NVD

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy