Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach LDAP service over network
-
DeliverySend CleanAllRUV status-check extended op
-
ExploitInject crafted filter into cn=config search
-
ExecutionObserve boolean match oracle
-
PersistIterate to extract bind DNs and password scheme
-
ImpactReuse metadata for credential attack
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization LDAP query parameterization
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the target expose the LDAP service and honor the CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operation to unauthenticated clients - i.e., a 389 Directory Server or Red Hat Directory Server instance with the multi-master replication (replication plugin) subsystem present and network-reachable. Per CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no credentials, user interaction, or special client privileges are needed against such an instance. Limiting factors: the attacker must reach the LDAP port (network segmentation or firewalling that blocks the extended operation prevents it), the impact is confined to configuration metadata exposed via a boolean oracle rather than arbitrary data reads, and extraction is incremental and boolean-blind, making it slower and more detectable than a direct read. Deployments that do not use replication or that restrict extended operations to trusted peers materially reduce exposure. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N scores 7.5 and is internally consistent with the description: fully remote, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, pure confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability effect. No EPSS score, KEV entry, or SSVC decision data was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input, and no public proof-of-concept was referenced. The realistic impact is narrower than raw confidentiality-High suggests: this is a blind boolean oracle that leaks configuration metadata (bind DNs, password storage scheme), not full data exfiltration or directory dumping, and exploiting a boolean oracle can be slow and noisy. Net assessment: a genuine unauthenticated information-disclosure and reconnaissance issue worth prioritized patching on internet- or partner-facing directory servers, but the absence of active-exploitation and POC signals places it below wormable or RCE-class emergencies. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the LDAP service sends a series of crafted CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operations, each embedding an injected LDAP filter fragment targeting cn=config. By observing whether each request returns a boolean match, the attacker infers replication bind DNs and the configured password storage scheme character by character, building an accurate picture of the directory's internal configuration for follow-on credential attacks. No public POC was referenced, but the low attack complexity makes scripting the oracle straightforward. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 31, 2026
Information disclosure in 389 Directory Server (upstream of Red Hat Directory Server 11-13, shipped across RHEL 6-10) lets an unauthenticated remote attacker inject LDAP search filters into the CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operation. Because the handler evaluates attacker-controlled filters against cn=config using elevated replication-plugin privileges and leaks a boolean match result, attackers can blindly enumerate sensitive configuration metadata such as replication bind DNs and password storage scheme details. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the network-reachable, no-authentication attack surface makes it a meaningful reconnaissance primitive.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the primary action is to monitor and apply the Red Hat errata referenced at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11770 and bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2484802, then update the 389-ds-base and redhat-ds packages to the fixed version once published. As compensating controls until patched: restrict network reachability of LDAP ports 389 and 636 so only trusted replication peers and management hosts can send extended operations via host firewall or network segmentation, accepting that this constrains legitimate remote administration; place the directory behind a filtering LDAP proxy or load balancer that can block or rate-limit the CleanAllRUV extended-operation OID, noting this may interfere with legitimate replication maintenance; and rotate replication bind DN credentials and review the password storage scheme configuration after patching in case metadata was already probed. Increase auditing and logging on extended-operation activity to detect oracle-style brute forcing.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
389 Directory Server is an open-source LDAP directory server that underpins Red Hat Directory Server and Red Hat Identity Management (FreeIPA). CleanAllRUV is a multi-master replication maintenance task used to purge obsolete Replica Update Vector (RUV) entries; its status is queried through an LDAP extended operation handled in ldap/servers/plugins/replication/repl_extop.c. The root cause is CWE-90 (LDAP Injection): user-supplied input is concatenated into an LDAP search filter without neutralizing filter metacharacters, and that filter is executed against the cn=config subtree with the replication plugin's elevated internal privileges. Because the operation returns a boolean match/no-match indication, the injected filter acts as a blind oracle, allowing character-by-character inference of configuration attribute values that a remote, unauthenticated client should never be able to read.
Know when LDAP gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Remote, no auth or interaction, low complexity; boolean-blind leak of sensitive config metadata yields C:H with no integrity or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject LDAP search filters into the CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operation. Because the handler performs the search against cn=config with elevated replication plugin privileges and returns a boolean match result, the attacker can extract sensitive server configuration metadata, including replication bind DNs and password storage scheme information.
Executive ViewAI
Red Hat Directory Server versions 11-13 and RHEL 6-10 systems are vulnerable to unauthenticated remote information disclosure attacks that allow attackers to extract sensitive directory configuration including replication passwords and authentication settings without authentication. This reconnaissance capability creates a direct staging point for coordinated attacks on identity infrastructure. Immediate network isolation is required while awaiting vendor remediation.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network access to Directory Server instances via firewall rules blocking LDAP ports 389/636 from untrusted networks, implement ACLs to disable or restrict the CleanAllRUV extended operation, enable and monitor LDAP query audit logs for anomalous filter patterns indicating reconnaissance attempts, and consider implementing LDAP request rate-limiting on the extended operation handler.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
The remoting module in Jenkins before 2.32 and LTS before 2.19.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a
In Joomla!. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required,
An issue was discovered on Accellion FTA devices before FTA_9_12_180. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerabi
An authenticated GitLab user can seize control of an existing LDAP-backed account on instances that have both OmniAuth S
LDAP injection in Central Dogma's Apache Shiro-based authentication module exposes unauthenticated remote attackers to a
Mastodon is a free, open-source social network server based on ActivityPub Mastodon allows configuration of LDAP for aut
Dolibarr 11.0.3 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability in LDAP synchronization settings that allows at
A reflected cross-site scripting (xss) vulnerability exists in the ldapUser functionality of MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.6
Authentication bypass in Apache Druid versions 0.17.0 through 35.x. Affects all versions prior to 36.0.0 when specific p
Arbitrary certificate disclosure in Apache CXF's XKMS server lets remote attackers abuse an LDAP injection flaw (CWE-90)
An issue was discovered in linqi before 1.4.0.1 on Windows. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is re
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Jahastech NxFilter 4.3.2.5.jsp?actionFlag=test&i
Same technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| suse/389-ds | Affected |
EUVD-2026-51510
GHSA-r7mx-568f-jgg3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB