Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege LDAP bind credentials
  2. Delivery
    Connect to LDAP service over network
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted Search Request with malformed UTF-8 filter string
  4. Execution
    Trigger ldap_utf8prev() backward heap over-read
  5. Impact
    Influence filter evaluation or expose partial heap memory

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer over-read prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated LDAP session - the CVSS vector PR:L confirms low-privilege credentials are sufficient; anonymous binds alone are not enough. The attack vector is Network (AV:N), meaning the attacker must be able to reach the LDAP service port (389/636) over the network, but physical or local access is not required. High Attack Complexity (AC:H) is the most significant limiting factor: the attacker must craft input that reliably positions ldap_utf8prev() at the precise start of a heap buffer, which depends on internal heap state and UTF-8 string layout - this is not trivially reproducible across arbitrary server states. The flaw is triggered specifically through LDAP Search Request filter strings containing UTF-8 character sequences processed by the string filter parser; deployments that do not expose LDAP search to untrusted authenticated users are at reduced risk. No special non-default configuration is indicated as required beyond having the Directory Server running and accessible.

Impact

The overall risk is moderate and context-dependent. CVSS 3.1 scores this at 5.0 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L), which correctly captures that network reachability is possible but exploitation requires both an authenticated session (PR:L) and high attack complexity (AC:H) - meaning specific, non-trivial conditions must be met regarding input crafting or server state. All three impact dimensions are rated Low, indicating blast radius is constrained; scope is Unchanged, so lateral movement via this vulnerability alone is unlikely. No EPSS score was provided in the intelligence data, preventing probabilistic exploitation likelihood assessment. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept exploit has been identified, further depressing near-term exploitation probability. The primary concern is heap layout disclosure through the over-read influencing filter behavior - an attacker with LDAP bind credentials could potentially extract partial heap memory or manipulate search results in subtle ways. For organizations with externally exposed LDAP endpoints or shared multi-tenant directories, the AC:H requirement may be achievable with targeted effort, making this a higher priority in those deployments despite the moderate base score.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with valid LDAP credentials - such as a low-privileged service account or an internal user in a corporate directory - crafts an LDAP Search Request containing a string filter with a malformed or edge-case UTF-8 sequence designed to position the ldap_utf8prev() pointer at the very start of the heap buffer, causing a backward read beyond the buffer boundary. The over-read bytes influence the filter parsing result, potentially leaking partial heap memory content into filter evaluation logic or producing unexpected search behavior, which the attacker could use to probe directory structure or infer heap layout for further exploitation. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, and AC:H indicates that reliably triggering this condition requires non-trivial input construction.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Heap buffer over-read in Red Hat Directory Server's ldap_utf8prev() function exposes LDAP deployments to potential confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact via crafted string filter input. The flaw affects authenticated, network-accessible LDAP servers running Red Hat Directory Server 11, 12, and 13 as well as the 389-ds component shipped across Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV; however, its presence in filter parsing logic - a core LDAP code path - warrants prompt patching in internet-exposed or multi-tenant directory environments.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the vendor-released patch from Red Hat once available; monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11787 and the associated Bugzilla entry (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2485425) for patch release and exact fixed versions, which are not confirmed in currently available intelligence. No exact fix version can be cited at this time - absence of version data should not be interpreted as patch unavailability, only as unconfirmed status. As a compensating control until patching, restrict LDAP bind access to trusted, known-good clients by enforcing IP allowlists or firewall rules at the LDAP port (typically TCP 389/636), reducing the pool of principals who can supply crafted filter strings; this directly addresses the PR:L and AV:N prerequisites. Additionally, consider enabling LDAP access logging at the verbose level to detect anomalous filter strings containing unusual UTF-8 byte sequences, which may indicate exploitation attempts. Disabling anonymous binds (if not already done) has no direct impact since PR:L already requires credentials, but reduces overall attack surface. For RHEL deployments, subscribe to Red Hat errata notifications for the 389-ds package.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

389 Directory Server is Red Hat's enterprise LDAP implementation, distributed both as a standalone product (Red Hat Directory Server 11/12/13) and embedded in RHEL 6-10 (cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_*). The vulnerable function ldap_utf8prev() is responsible for backward traversal of UTF-8 encoded byte sequences - a common operation when parsing LDAP search filter strings that may contain multi-byte characters. CWE-126 (Buffer Over-Read) describes the root cause: the function reads bytes at a memory address before the logical start of the allocated heap buffer without performing bounds validation. This over-read does not write data (distinguishing it from a buffer overflow), but it does expose arbitrary heap memory contents to the parsing logic, potentially influencing filter evaluation outcomes or leaking heap layout. The flaw resides specifically in the string filter parsing subsystem, meaning it is reachable via standard LDAP Search Request operations.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
SUSE 5.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Red Hat 5.0 MEDIUM

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Jun 12, 2026 - 18:52 NVD
5.0 (MEDIUM) 6.3 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Jun 09, 2026 - 13:02 nvd
MEDIUM 5.0

DescriptionNVD

A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The ldap_utf8prev() function reads bytes before the start of a buffer without bounds checking, causing a heap buffer over-read in string filter parsing that may influence internal filter processing behavior.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 87% exploitable
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Affected Products (CPE)NVD

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy