Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege LDAP credentials
-
DeliveryConnect to 389-ds LDAP endpoint over network
-
ExploitSend crafted SSO token extended operation request
-
ExecutionType confusion leaks partial stack addresses in response
-
PersistParse response to derive ASLR memory layout
-
ImpactUse layout data to enable reliable follow-on exploit
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Type safety enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid LDAP bind with at least low-privilege credentials (confirmed by PR:L in the CVSS vector - unauthenticated access is not sufficient). The vulnerable code path is specifically the SSO token extended operation handler, meaning the SSO token extended operation feature must be reachable by the authenticated user; environments that have removed or ACL-restricted this extended operation OID are not exploitable via this path. The LDAP service must be network-reachable from the attacker (AV:N), but no special network position, man-in-the-middle, or race condition is required (AC:L). No user interaction or admin session is needed (UI:N). Exploitation is limited by: the requirement for a valid LDAP account, the partial (not full) nature of the stack address disclosure, and the absence of a demonstrated full exploit chain at time of analysis. |
| Impact | CVSS 3.1 scores this at 4.3 (Medium) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N. The network-accessible, low-complexity attack path with no user interaction is concerning, but the PR:L prerequisite (low-privilege authenticated LDAP account) is a meaningful barrier. The confidentiality impact is rated Low because only partial stack addresses are disclosed rather than sensitive directory data. No EPSS score was provided in the source intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified numerically. The vulnerability is not in CISA KEV and no public proof-of-concept code is identified, making opportunistic mass exploitation unlikely in the near term. The real elevated risk is chaining: this class of stack-layout leak is a standard first stage in bypassing ASLR before triggering a memory-corruption primitive, and the 'Memory Corruption' tag hints that the underlying type confusion may be more exploitable than the current advisory conveys. CVSS Integrity and Availability scores of N/N reflect only the confirmed disclosure impact - defenders should treat this as moderate-priority, especially on Internet-exposed LDAP endpoints. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a valid low-privilege LDAP account (or compromised service account) connects to the 389-ds LDAP endpoint over the network and sends a crafted extended operation request targeting the SSO token handler. The type confusion causes the server to serialize partial stack memory addresses into the LDAP response, which the attacker reads to map the server's memory layout. This leaked stack address data can then be fed into a separate, chained memory-corruption exploit to bypass ASLR and achieve reliable code execution. No public proof-of-concept code is known at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026
Partial stack address disclosure in Red Hat 389 Directory Server (versions 11, 12, and 13) allows authenticated remote users to extract memory layout information via crafted LDAP extended operation requests. The root cause is a CWE-843 type confusion in the SSO token extended operation handler, which causes stack pointer data to bleed into LDAP response payloads. While the direct impact is limited to low-confidence information disclosure, leaked stack addresses are a classic ASLR-weakening primitive that could facilitate chained exploitation. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version was identified in the available intelligence at time of analysis; patch status should be confirmed against the Red Hat Security Advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11785 and the internal tracking ticket at https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/PSIRTSUPT-7600. Until a patch is applied, administrators can reduce exposure by restricting LDAP access to the SSO token extended operation (OID-level ACIs in 389-ds can be configured to deny specific extended operation requests to untrusted accounts, limiting who can trigger the vulnerable handler). Additionally, enforcing strong authentication requirements for LDAP binds (e.g., requiring certificate-based or SASL GSSAPI bind rather than simple bind) raises the bar for the PR:L prerequisite. If 389-ds is not required to be Internet-facing, restricting TCP port 389/636 access to known management subnets via firewall rules eliminates the AV:N vector entirely with no service degradation for internal users. Note that the 'Memory Corruption' tag warrants monitoring the Red Hat advisory for a severity upgrade if a more exploitable variant is confirmed.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
389 Directory Server (the upstream open-source project shipping as Red Hat Directory Server 11/12/13 and bundled with RHEL 6 through 10 via the corresponding CPE strings) implements LDAP extended operations - protocol-level request/response pairs for vendor-specific features. The SSO token extended operation handler contains a CWE-843 (Type Confusion) defect: the handler allocates or interprets internal data under one type and subsequently accesses it under an incompatible type, causing the LDAP response serialization to inadvertently embed partial stack address values. Because the leaked values originate from the stack, this disclosure can weaken Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), a key exploit-mitigation technique. The tags 'Information Disclosure' and 'Memory Corruption' both appear, suggesting the type confusion also produces undefined memory state internally, even if only the information leak is currently demonstrated.
Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A type confusion in the SSO token extended operation handler causes partial stack address information to be disclosed in LDAP responses to authenticated users.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
Related Vulnerabilities in 389 Directory Server Memory and Input Handling Flaws
View all 8More in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
View allHeap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash
Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h
Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft
Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript
Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity
A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to
The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe
Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo
Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter
Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a
A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes
Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe
Same technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| suse/389-ds | Affected |
EUVD-2026-35418
GHSA-8v22-4r9h-6m6j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB