Skip to main content

WDR201A WiFi Extender EUVDEUVD-2026-27127

| CVE-2026-41927 HIGH
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-05-04 VulnCheck
8.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Scan internet for WDR201A devices
  2. Delivery
    Craft POST with oversized Content-Length
  3. Exploit
    Trigger buffer overflow in fgets()
  4. Execution
    Overwrite return address with ROP chain
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary code as CGI process
  6. Impact
    Establish persistence or pivot to network

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Remote network access to WDR201A WiFi Extender management interface (typically HTTP on TCP port 80 or HTTPS on TCP port 443) running vulnerable firmware LFMZX28040922V1.02. No authentication required - CVSS vector PR:N confirms unauthenticated exploitation against default configurations. Exploitation complexity is HIGH (AC:H) due to requirement for advanced exploit development skills: attacker must successfully construct ROP chain or return-to-libc payload accounting for firmware-specific memory layout, identify usable gadgets within device binaries, and bypass any stack protections (canaries, ASLR if present). Limits to exploitation: AC:H significantly constrains attacker population to those with embedded systems exploitation expertise and access to target firmware for offline analysis. Devices deployed behind NAT without port forwarding are NOT vulnerable to remote exploitation. User interaction NOT required (UI:N) - vulnerable CGI processes automatically handle incoming POST requests.

Impact

Real-world risk is HIGH for exposed devices but limited by exploitation complexity and attack surface. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) indicates remote network exploitation without authentication or user interaction, but high attack complexity (AC:H) reflects the technical sophistication required to craft working ROP/return-to-libc exploits that successfully bypass ASLR or other memory protections. No EPSS score provided in input data, preventing quantitative exploitation probability assessment. CISA KEV status not provided - if not listed, this suggests no confirmed widespread exploitation despite public POC availability. The publicly available exploit from VulnCheck research significantly lowers the barrier for skilled attackers. Impact is concerning (VC:L/VI:L/VA:H) with high availability impact, though confidentiality and integrity impacts are rated low, suggesting exploitation may primarily enable denial-of-service or initial foothold rather than full data compromise. The IoT device class (WiFi extender) means exposed devices likely have minimal security monitoring and patching processes. CRITICAL GAP: No EPSS data provided, no KEV status confirmed, and no SSVC decision framework data available - these missing signals prevent complete risk quantification. Recommend treating as HIGH priority for consumer IoT devices with direct internet exposure, MEDIUM for network-segmented deployments where AC:H meaningfully reduces risk.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

Attacker scans internet ranges identifying WDR201A WiFi Extenders via HTTP banner fingerprinting or UPnP discovery responses. Once target identified, attacker crafts malicious HTTP POST request to http://[target-ip]/firewall.cgi or /makeRequest.cgi with Content-Length header set to 1024 bytes. Request body contains 512 bytes of padding followed by carefully constructed ROP chain leveraging gadgets from device firmware, overwriting saved return address to redirect execution. Upon CGI process return, attacker gains arbitrary code execution with web server privileges, typically enabling device compromise, network pivoting, or botnet recruitment. Publicly available POC from VulnCheck research (referenced at mstreet97.github.io) provides technical blueprint reducing exploit development time from weeks to hours for moderately skilled attackers.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 04, 2026

Stack-based buffer overflow in WDR201A WiFi Extender firewall.cgi and makeRequest.cgi binaries enables remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code through crafted POST requests with oversized Content-Length headers. The vulnerability affects hardware version 2.1 running firmware LFMZX28040922V1.02, with publicly available proof-of-concept exploit code documented via AI-assisted vulnerability research. CVSS 8.3 with high attack complexity indicates exploitation requires advanced technical skills, though the network vector and lack of authentication requirements make this a significant risk for exposed IoT devices.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - firmware LFMZX28040922V1.02 remains the latest known version with no confirmed security update. Contact Shenzhen Yipu Commercial and Trading Co. directly via Made-in-China marketplace (https://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/yeapook/) to request patched firmware addressing CVE-2026-41927. Immediate compensating controls: (1) Remove WDR201A devices from direct internet exposure by placing behind NAT/firewall - blocks AV:N exploitation but reduces extender functionality if remote management required; (2) Implement strict firewall rules permitting only trusted source IPs to access device management interface (typically TCP/80 or TCP/443) - reduces attack surface but requires static IP management; (3) Disable remote management features entirely if device can be administered only via local network - eliminates remote attack vector but prevents off-site administration; (4) Deploy network intrusion detection monitoring for HTTP POST requests with Content-Length values exceeding 512 bytes targeting CGI endpoints - provides detection but not prevention and generates false positives from legitimate large uploads. For enterprise deployments, consider replacing with alternative WiFi extender products from vendors with established vulnerability disclosure programs and regular security updates.

Affected VersionsENISA

WDR201A WiFi Extender 0 ≤1.02

Affected Packages

euvd wdr201a_wifi_extender no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This vulnerability exploits inadequate input validation in the fgets() function implementation within two CGI binaries (firewall.cgi and makeRequest.cgi) on the WDR201A WiFi Extender. The binaries allocate a fixed 512-byte stack buffer but fail to properly validate the Content-Length header value in incoming HTTP POST requests. When Content-Length exceeds 512 bytes, continued reading overwrites adjacent stack memory including the saved return address. This is a classic CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow) where the attacker controls sufficient stack data to redirect execution flow. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:shenzhen_yipu_commercial_and_trading_co.,_ltd:wdr201a_wifi_extender) identifies this as a product from Shenzhen Yipu Commercial and Trading Co., Ltd. Exploitation leverages return-oriented programming (ROP) or return-to-libc techniques to bypass common exploit mitigations, requiring the attacker to craft precise payloads that chain existing executable code segments. The CGI interface processes HTTP requests from the network layer without authentication, exposing the vulnerable code path to remote attackers.

Know when Wdr201A Wifi Extender gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 8.3 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
May 04, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
8.3 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

WDR201A WiFi Extender (HW V2.1, FW LFMZX28040922V1.02) contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the firewall.cgi and makeRequest.cgi binaries that allows unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the saved return address by sending a POST request with a Content-Length header exceeding 512 bytes. Attackers can exploit insufficient length validation in the fgets() call to achieve arbitrary code execution through return-oriented programming or return-to-libc techniques.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The WDR201A WiFi Extender contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-41927, CVSS 8.3) affecting firmware version LFMZX28040922V1.02 that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on exposed devices through malformed web requests. Any organization deploying these extenders on corporate networks, guest networks, or branch offices faces immediate risk of device compromise, lateral movement, and potential network infiltration. With publicly available exploit code and no vendor patch available, this poses an active threat requiring urgent inventory and remediation decisions.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict network access to affected devices via firewall rules blocking inbound HTTP/HTTPS to firewall.cgi and makeRequest.cgi endpoints; (2) Isolate devices to a dedicated VLAN with minimal trust relationships; (3) Disable remote management interfaces if supported by firmware; (4) Monitor for suspicious POST requests with oversized Content-Length headers to these endpoints; (5) Plan hardware replacement as primary remediation strategy pending vendor patch availability.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 87% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

62
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy