Skip to main content

Sentinel Keys Server EUVDEUVD-2026-114364

| CVE-2026-78403 CRITICAL
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-10-30 THA-PSIRT GHSA-fxcq-q77c-fh3w
9.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: THA-PSIRT
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Sentinel Keys Server HTTP port
  2. Exploit
    Craft oversized first HTTP field
  3. Execution
    Trigger stack buffer overflow
  4. Impact
    Execute code as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against Sentinel Keys Server (versions lower than 1.3.8.0) on Windows: the server does not check the length of the first field in an HTTP request, so any attacker who can reach its HTTP listener can trigger the overflow. The only real limiting factor is network reachability of the Sentinel Keys Server service; there is no authentication, user-interaction, or special-configuration requirement stated. Exploitation requires that the vulnerable version be deployed and its HTTP service exposed to the attacker.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority issue, not a CVSS-inflated one. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N, VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) describes remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, and the description confirms the mechanism: a missing length check on the first field of an HTTP request produces a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) leading to code execution as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. The vuln.today Decision label is act_now, which aligns with the network-reachable, no-auth, SYSTEM-level outcome. Counter-signals exist: there is no CISA KEV listing, no public exploit reference, and no EPSS score provided, so there is currently no evidence of active or at-scale exploitation - the urgency rests on the intrinsic severity and the act_now decision, not on observed attacks. The missing authorization flaw reinforces the PR:N rating. Net: treat as an act_now patching priority given SYSTEM-level unauthenticated RCE, while recognizing that exploitation-in-the-wild is unconfirmed and EPSS is absent from the input.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to a Sentinel Keys Server instance sends a single crafted HTTP request whose first field exceeds the unchecked length, overflowing a stack buffer and executing attacker-supplied code as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. Because no authentication is required (PR:N) and complexity is low (AC:L), any party able to reach the service port can attempt this. No public exploit code or PoC reference is present in the supplied data.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026

Remote code execution in Thales Sentinel Keys Server on Windows (versions lower than 1.3.8.0) lets unauthenticated network attackers compromise the service by sending a crafted HTTP request whose first field is overlong, overflowing a stack buffer and leading to code execution as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. The same request path also lacks an authorization check, so no credentials or user interaction are required - the practical gating factor is whether the Sentinel Keys Server HTTP listener is reachable from the attacker. It is scored 9.3 under CVSS v4.0 (independent assessment: CVSS 3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/C:H/I:H/A:H) and is triaged act_now; no CISA KEV entry is reported and no public exploit code is identified in the provided sources.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Thales Sentinel Keys Server to 1.3.8.0 or later - the advisory lists affected versions as lower than 1.3.8.0, making 1.3.8.0 the first fixed release referenced (vendor advisory: https://supportportal.thalesgroup.com/csm?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=50fc9f3b3b005f10bba8b41864e45a61&sysparm_article=KB0031216). No workaround or compensating control is documented in the supplied sources, and because the overflow sits directly in HTTP request parsing there is no feature setting described that removes the exposure short of the fix. The independent assessment notes that exploitability is gated only by network reachability of the Sentinel Keys Server HTTP listener, so restricting which hosts and networks can reach that listener limits exposure while the 1.3.8.0 upgrade is staged, at the cost of blocking legitimate licensing clients that rely on remote access to the service.

Affected VersionsENISA

Sentinel Keys Server 0 <1.3.8.0

Affected Packages

euvd sentinel_keys_server fix: 1.3.8.0

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-121 stack-based buffer overflow in the HTTP request handling of Thales Sentinel Keys Server for Windows. Per the vendor advisory, the server does not validate the length of the first field in an incoming HTTP request, so attacker-supplied data is written past a fixed-size stack buffer; the sources state this can lead to remote code execution in the context of NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM, the highly privileged account the service runs under. The same advisory attributes a missing authorization check to the affected request handling, meaning the vulnerable path is reachable without establishing an authorized session. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:thalesgroup:sentinel_keys_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all versions below the fixed release, and the CVSS:4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) is consistent with a network-reachable, unauthenticated trigger and no additional attack prerequisites. The sources describe the trigger as the unchecked length of the first HTTP field; precisely how the overwrite is converted into control-flow hijack, and which platform mitigations apply, is not described in the available sources.

Know when Sentinel Keys Server gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (THA-PSIRT) PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Remote unauthenticated HTTP request (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) due to missing authorization and unchecked length; SYSTEM-level RCE gives C:H/I:H/A:H with scope unchanged (SC/SI/SA:N in the 4.0 source).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (THA-PSIRT).

CVSS VectorVendor: THA-PSIRT

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 30, 2026 - 21:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 30, 2026 - 19:12 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.3

DescriptionCVE.org

Stack-based buffer overflow and missing authorization vulnerability in Thales Sentinel Keys Server on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. Sentinel Keys Server does not check the length of the first field in the HTTP request. An attacker may craft an HTTP request and send it to Sentinel Keys Server. It may lead to remote code execution as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM.

This issue affects Sentinel Keys Server: versions lower than 1.3.8.0.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Thales Sentinel Keys Server (versions below 1.3.8.0) on Windows allows network attackers to compromise the service without credentials. This puts any organization with an internet-facing or broadly reachable instance at risk of full system compromise, potentially leading to data breaches, service disruption, and regulatory exposure. Leadership should prioritize immediate mitigation because no patch is currently available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Restrict network access to the Sentinel Keys Server HTTP listener to trusted hosts only; deploy WAF/IPS rules to block malformed requests; monitor for anomalous activity; apply vendor patch when released.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 52% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche software-licensing middleware, limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
2 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy