Skip to main content

HCL BigFix AEX EUVDEUVD-2026-112040

| CVE-2026-21830 LOW
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-10-28 HCL GHSA-gw6w-q73x-mgg3
3.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: HCL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Influence aws-sdk endpoint/region input
  2. Exploit
    Request routed to non-AWS endpoint
  3. Impact
    Capture leaked API request data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

The flaw resides in the aws-sdk package bundled with HCL BigFix AEX V13.0 and manifests as AWS API requests being sent to unintended or non-AWS endpoints. The CVSS vector marks it unauthenticated and network-reachable (PR:N, UI:N, AV:N) but with high attack complexity (AC:H), indicating meaningful preconditions must align for exploitation; however, the specific feature, configuration setting, or input that must be attacker-controlled is not described in the available sources. Limiting factors are the high complexity, the confidentiality-only impact (C:L, no integrity or availability), and the narrow deployment footprint of the product.

Impact

This is a low-severity, low-priority issue, consistent across every available signal. The vendor-assigned CVSS is 3.7 (Low) with vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - network-reachable and unauthenticated, but high attack complexity and limited to a low confidentiality impact only (no integrity or availability impact). The vuln.today decision label is 'monitor', the weakest urgency tier, which aligns with the low CVSS. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit were supplied, so there is no evidence of exploitation pressure. The signals are therefore mutually consistent rather than conflicting: a low-CVSS issue with no exploitation indicators. The one point worth verifying is the CWE-20/description framing versus the vector: the description (AWS API requests routed to unintended or non-AWS endpoints) suggests an endpoint-resolution/input-validation flaw whose real impact could include leakage of request data or credentials to an attacker-influenced endpoint, which the C:L rating already captures as limited. The AC:H metric is not explained by the sources, so the specific condition that makes exploitation complex is not stated in the available data.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can influence the endpoint or region resolution inputs consumed by the bundled aws-sdk could cause BigFix AEX to send AWS API requests - potentially including request metadata or credentials - to a non-AWS endpoint under the attacker's control, enabling limited information disclosure. The high attack complexity (AC:H) indicates non-trivial preconditions must be met, and no public exploit was identified. The exact trigger is not described in the available sources.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

HCL BigFix AEX V13.0 contains a flaw in its bundled aws-sdk package that can cause AWS API requests to be directed to unintended or non-AWS endpoints, with limited confidentiality impact. The issue is rated CVSS 3.7 with high attack complexity and no authentication or user interaction required; the specific exploitation preconditions are not described in the available sources. No public exploit code or active exploitation is identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data; use HCL advisory KB0134884 at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134884 to confirm the fixed release and vendor guidance for BigFix AEX V13.0. No specific workaround is described in the supplied data, so applying the vendor-prescribed update is the only complete remediation identified; verify applicability to V13.0 before deployment.

Affected VersionsENISA

BigFix AEX V13.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue resides in the aws-sdk package bundled with HCL BigFix AEX V13.0. AWS SDKs are used to construct, sign, and route AWS API requests; this CWE-20 improper input validation flaw can cause those requests to be sent to unintended or non-AWS endpoints, exposing limited confidential information. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:bigfix_aex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms the affected product family. The trigger, the specific SDK API or configuration path, and the attacker-controlled input are not described in the available sources; the high attack complexity indicates that meaningful preconditions must align, but they are unverified.

Know when Bigfix Aex gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (HCL) PRIMARY 3.7 LOW
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 3.7 LOW

Network-reachable aws-sdk endpoint-resolution flaw with non-trivial preconditions (AC:H), no auth needed (PR:N), limited data exposure only (C:L, I:N, A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).

CVSS VectorVendor: HCL

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

HCL BigFix AEX product is affected by a vulnerability in the aws-sdk package.. It may cause AWS API requests to be sent to unintended or non‐AWS endpoints.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise AI/assist product, limited deployment footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Low

Priority Score

18
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +18
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy