Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain RSVP-TE adjacent position
-
ExploitSend crafted associated-bidirectional LSP signaling
-
ExecutionTrigger reachable assertion in rpd
-
ImpactCrash routing process (DoS)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Reachable assertion handling
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the target Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved device be configured for RSVP-TE with associated-bidirectional LSP signaling - devices without MPLS traffic-engineering / RSVP-TE enabled are not exposed. The attacker must be network-adjacent (AV:A): they need an RSVP-TE signaling relationship or adjacency to the device (e.g., a directly connected or TE-domain peer), not arbitrary remote Internet reachability. No authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are needed once that adjacency exists. The adjacency requirement and the dependency on a non-default TE feature are the primary factors limiting real-world exploitation; impact is limited to availability (routing process crash) with automatic recovery, not code execution or data exposure. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but bounded denial-of-service issue rather than a top-tier emergency. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) indicates an adjacent, low-complexity, unauthenticated trigger with no user interaction, which is a favorable profile for an attacker, but the impact is confined to availability (VA:H, with only SA:L on subsequent systems) - there is no confidentiality or integrity loss (VC:N/VI:N), consistent with CWE-617 Reachable Assertion causing an rpd crash. The adjacency requirement (AV:A, not AV:N) is the single most important limiting factor: the attacker must have a Layer-2/signaling-adjacent position with an RSVP-TE relationship to the device, which sharply narrows the realistic attacker population to peers on the MPLS/TE control plane rather than arbitrary internet hosts. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the AU:Y (automatable) and R:A (automatic recovery) secondary metrics suggest that while a crash could be scripted, the routing process typically restarts, limiting persistent damage. Net: a real patch-worthy priority for carriers and enterprises running RSVP-TE associated-bidirectional LSPs, but not a drop-everything issue for networks that do not deploy that feature. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with an RSVP-TE signaling adjacency to a vulnerable Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved router (for example a malicious or compromised MPLS peer on the same TE domain) sends crafted associated-bidirectional LSP signaling messages. The malformed signaling reaches an assertion in the rpd routing process, crashing it and disrupting routing/forwarding until the process recovers. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no public exploit code is known at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Adjacent, unauthenticated attackers can crash the routing process (rpd) in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved by sending crafted RSVP-TE associated-bidirectional LSP signaling messages, resulting in a denial-of-service condition. This reachable assertion (CWE-617) requires the target device to be configured for RSVP-TE with associated-bidirectional LSP signaling and the attacker to be network-adjacent, meaning they must have an RSVP-TE signaling relationship or adjacency to the device. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the impact is limited to availability with automatic recovery, not code execution or data exposure.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patch as described in Juniper advisory JSA112187; the exact fixed version is not specified in the available data, but a patch is available per the vendor. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling RSVP-TE with associated-bidirectional LSP signaling if it is not operationally required-this removes the attack vector but will break MPLS traffic engineering features that depend on it. Alternatively, restrict RSVP-TE adjacency to trusted network peers using access control lists or routing policy, and ensure that only authorized devices can establish RSVP-TE signaling relationships. These mitigations reduce exposure but do not eliminate the vulnerability; the primary fix is to upgrade to a patched release. Refer to the advisory for full details and exact fixed versions.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability resides in the rpd (routing protocol daemon) process of Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, which handles RSVP-TE signaling for MPLS traffic engineering. When processing associated-bidirectional LSP (label-switched path) signaling messages, an assertion failure can be triggered, causing the rpd process to crash. This is a classic reachable assertion (CWE-617) where unexpected input violates an internal invariant. The attacker must be on an adjacent network segment (AV:A) and have the ability to send RSVP-TE signaling packets to the device, typically requiring a direct or TE-domain adjacency. No authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N) is needed. The CPE strings indicate that all versions of Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved are potentially affected until patched. The CVSS 4.0 vector rates availability impact as high (VA:H) and subsequent system availability impact as low (SA:L), aligning with a routing process crash that may affect some dependent services but recovery is automatic. An independent assessment concurs that this is a bounded denial-of-service issue rather than a top-tier emergency, given the adjacency and configuration prerequisites.
Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
Adjacent RSVP-TE peer (AV:A), unauthenticated and low-complexity trigger (PR:N/AC:L), availability-only impact from the rpd crash (A:H, C:N/I:N), scope unchanged as only the local router is affected.
Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).
CVSS VectorVendor: juniper
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A Reachable Assertion vulnerability in the rpd process of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an adjacent attacker to crash the routing process via RSVP-TE associated-bidirectional LSP signaling.
Executive ViewAI
Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved devices that enable RSVP-TE associated-bidirectional LSP signaling face a high-severity availability risk from a network-adjacent attacker with an existing signaling adjacency, who can crash the routing process and disrupt network services until automatic recovery. Leadership should prioritize this because core routing infrastructure may be affected, although no public exploit identified at time of analysis and there is no evidence of code execution or data exposure.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: disable RSVP-TE associated-bidirectional LSP signaling where not operationally required; restrict RSVP-TE signaling adjacencies to trusted peers using ACLs or firewall filters; monitor rpd for crashes and enable automatic recovery; segment routing domains; apply vendor workarounds when available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u
Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W
Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow
A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices
Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro
Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid
Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas
Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin
Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b
Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno
Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co
Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab
EUVD-2026-101366
GHSA-7mv8-894j-8w59
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB