Skip to main content

sfturing hosp_order CVE-2026-96550

| EUVDEUVD-2026-85640 LOW
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information (CWE-319)
2026-09-23 VulDB GHSA-x4rm-43rj-crmc
2.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain network man-in-the-middle position
  2. Exploit
    Intercept SMTP traffic from MailUtil
  3. Execution
    Read cleartext email contents
  4. Impact
    Harvest sensitive/notification data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Transport encryption
Exploitation Conditions

Requires the application to be configured to send email via MailUtil over an unencrypted SMTP connection (no TLS/STARTTLS in the properties returned by getProperties), AND the attacker must hold a network interception (adversary-in-the-middle) position on the path between the app server and the mail server to observe the plaintext. Limiting factors: this is passive-disclosure only (VC:L, no integrity/availability impact), attack complexity is high per the CVSS vector (E:P, 'exploitability difficult'), and the affected product is an obscure hospital-order app with negligible deployment; no code execution or authentication compromise results directly.

Impact

This is a low-real-risk issue despite a nominal CVSS 4.0 score of 6.3. The core signals point away from priority: CWE-319 (cleartext transmission) here concerns email/SMTP configuration in MailUtil.getProperties() that omits TLS, and the CVSS vector itself flags AC:H ('the complexity of an attack is rather high') and E:P ('exploitability assessed as difficult'). VulDB describes only VC:L (limited confidentiality impact, no integrity or availability impact). Exploitation requires an adversary-in-the-middle position on the network path to actually capture the plaintext mail traffic, which is why AC:H is appropriate - the raw score is inflated by AV:N/PR:N/UI:N even though the practical bar (network interception) is high. No EPSS score and no CISA KEV listing are present; a public POC exists (VulDB submission referencing GitHub issue #121), but POC availability is NOT the same as active exploitation. There is no vendor fix (rolling-release project, vendor unresponsive). Net: publicly available exploit code exists but no evidence of real-world exploitation, low impact, and a niche affected product - deprioritize versus network-vector RCE/authz flaws.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned on the network path between the hosp_order application server and its SMTP mail server (e.g., shared LAN, compromised router, or hostile transit) passively captures outbound email traffic that MailUtil sends over an unencrypted connection, reading sensitive contents such as notification data or embedded credentials. A public POC referenced via GitHub issue #121 demonstrates the cleartext-transmission condition, but the CVSS vector marks attack complexity high because the attacker must first achieve the interception position.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026

Cleartext SMTP email transmission in sfturing hosp_order (MailUtil.getProperties) can expose sensitive email-related data to an attacker who already holds a network interception position between the application server and the mail server. Publicly available exploit code exists, but there is no confirmed active exploitation; the issue requires an unencrypted SMTP configuration and high-complexity adversary-in-the-middle access, and it produces only limited confidentiality impact. This is assessed as a low-real-risk issue despite the nominal CVSS 4.0 score of 6.3.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; the project was informed via issue report but has not responded, and no updated release version is available. Until a fix is issued, the primary mitigation is to prevent cleartext SMTP by requiring TLS or STARTTLS in the MailUtil.getProperties mail configuration and by enforcing encrypted SMTP on the mail server side; this may cause mail delivery failures if the mail server does not support TLS or if certificate validation is misconfigured. Additional compensating controls include placing the application server and mail server on a trusted, segmented network path, using authenticated SMTP over TLS with validated certificates, and monitoring for unencrypted SMTP traffic; these reduce but do not eliminate the risk from an adversary-in-the-middle who can already intercept traffic. Monitor the GitHub repository and issue https://github.com/sfturing/hosp_order/issues/121 plus the VulDB advisory https://vuldb.com/vuln/408952 for an official fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

hosp_order 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected Java component is MailUtil.java in sfturing hosp_order, specifically the getProperties function, which builds and returns mail session properties used to send email. When those properties do not enforce TLS or STARTTLS, SMTP traffic can traverse the network in cleartext, matching CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information). The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:sfturing:hosp_order:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates the product is tracked without a specific release version because it uses continuous delivery/rolling releases; the description references the commit range up to 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8. The vulnerability is not a code-execution or authentication-bypass flaw: it is a transport-security weakness whose exploitation depends on the application's SMTP transport configuration and the attacker's ability to intercept that network path.

Know when Java gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.9 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 3.7 LOW

Cleartext SMTP transmission is remotely reachable (AV:N) but exploitation needs a network interception position, so AC:H; confidentiality-only limited disclosure (C:L), no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Sep 23, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Sep 23, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM) 2.9 (LOW)
CVE Published
Sep 23, 2026 - 19:30 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.3

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was found in sfturing hosp_order up to 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8. This issue affects the function getProperties of the file ssm_pro/src/main/java/cn/sfturing/utils/MailUtil.java. Performing a manipulation results in cleartext transmission of sensitive information. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
obscure single-developer GitHub Java/SSM hospital app, no enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Low

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +14
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

More in Java

View all
CVE-2012-4681 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 28

Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m

CVE-2015-7450 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 02

Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti

CVE-2013-2465 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 18

Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent

CVE-2011-3544 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 19

Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug

CVE-2010-1871 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 05

JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to

CVE-2012-1723 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up

CVE-2013-0422 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 10

Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using

CVE-2012-0507 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 07

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up

CVE-2015-4852 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 18

The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers

CVE-2012-5076 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow

CVE-2017-3066 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 27

Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla

CVE-2012-0391 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 08

The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy