Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessDeliver malicious app to developer host
-
DeliveryLaunch app inside sandbox
-
ExploitLoad unvalidated attacker library
-
ExecutionBypass library validation to escape sandbox
-
ImpactGain host-level code execution
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Trusted source inclusion only
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a malicious application to already be present and executing on the host within Xcode's app sandbox; the flaw lets that app bypass library validation to load untrusted libraries and break out of the sandbox. Limiting factors: exploitation is LOCAL only (attacker code must run first - e.g. a trojanized developer tool or dependency), it is confined to macOS systems running Xcode prior to version 27, and it provides escalation/escape rather than initial access. No remote or network path and no separate privileged account are needed once the malicious app runs. |
| Impact | This is a local-access sandbox escape in Apple's Xcode, fixed in Xcode 27 and credited to Apple itself. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C) is internally consistent with the description: a 'malicious app' must already be executing on the host with low privilege inside its sandbox (AV:L, PR:L), requires no user interaction, and the scope change (S:C) plus C:H/I:H/A:H correctly reflect that breaking the sandbox boundary compromises resources beyond the originally authorized component. The headline 8.8 is driven by the scope change, not by remote reach - this is NOT a network-exploitable flaw, so it should not be triaged alongside remote RCEs despite the high number. No EPSS score was provided (unknown exploitation probability), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public POC was supplied, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. CWE-829 (inclusion of functionality from an untrusted control sphere) aligns with the stated fix - enforcing library validation - indicating the root cause is loading of attacker-controlled libraries that bypassed validation. Net assessment: a genuine but second-stage privilege/isolation issue requiring prior code execution via a malicious app; real priority for developer/build machines, but materially lower urgency than any unauthenticated network vector, and there is no evidence of active exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker distributes a malicious application (e.g. via a trojanized tool or dependency aimed at developers) that, once run within its sandbox, abuses the missing library-validation enforcement to load attacker-controlled code and break out of the sandbox, gaining broader access to the host. No user interaction beyond running the app is needed and no public exploit code is currently known. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 20, 2026
Apple Xcode before version 27 fails to enforce library validation on certain bundled binaries, allowing a malicious app already running inside Xcode's sandbox to load untrusted libraries and break out of that sandbox (CVSS 8.8, scope-changed, high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact). Exploitation is strictly local: an attacker must first get code executing on the macOS host - for example through a trojanized developer tool, plugin, or dependency - and the flaw then provides sandbox escape and privilege escalation rather than initial access. Apple addressed the issue by enforcing library validation, shipping the fix in Xcode 27 (available from https://support.apple.com/en-us/149040); no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Xcode 27, which enforces library validation on the affected binaries and resolves the sandbox escape (vendor-released patch: Xcode 27, per https://support.apple.com/en-us/149040). Until upgrading, treat the Xcode sandbox as non-security-relevant: run only signed and notarized developer tools, plugins, and third-party dependencies in the build chain (trade-off: reduced flexibility for unsigned or in-house tooling), avoid opening projects or running build scripts from untrusted sources, and isolate Xcode development activity on a dedicated, low-privilege macOS account or VM so a successful escape yields fewer resources. Additionally, monitor for unexpected unsigned dylibs loaded into Xcode processes via endpoint security tooling (trade-off: alerting overhead and possible false positives during legitimate debugging), and restrict which users may install application bundles into ~/Applications and /Applications to limit the delivery vector for a malicious host app.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-829 (Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere): affected Xcode binaries did not apply hardened-runtime library validation, so they would load dynamic libraries from locations an attacker can influence. On macOS, library validation normally restricts a process to loading only libraries signed by the same Team ID or by Apple; without that check, a malicious app confined to Xcode's app sandbox can inject a crafted dylib into a trusted Xcode component and leverage that component's entitlements to escape sandbox confinement. The CVSS:3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the prerequisites: local access with low-complexity attack, low privileges (attacker code already executing), no user interaction, and a scope change indicating the escaping process gains authority beyond its original security context. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:apple:xcode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, with EUVD listing the vulnerable range as Xcode 0 through versions prior to 27 on macOS.
Know when Xcode gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Malicious app must already run locally inside the sandbox (AV:L, PR:L), needs no user interaction, and escaping the sandbox is a scope change (S:C) yielding full host compromise.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
This issue was addressed by enforcing library validation on the affected binaries. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27. A malicious app may be able to break out of its sandbox.
Executive ViewAI
Apple Xcode releases prior to 27 contain a sandbox-escape weakness that allows code already running on a Mac to load untrusted libraries and break out of Xcode's sandbox, putting developer workstations and the build pipelines they connect to at risk. Exploitation requires an attacker to already have a foothold on the host, so the realistic exposure is post-compromise escalation and movement out of an isolated build environment rather than broad external attack. Leadership should care because developer machines and CI runners concentrate source code, code-signing credentials, and production access, meaning a sandbox escape there can turn a contained incident into a supply-chain problem.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Related Vulnerabilities in Xcode Binary Parsing and Sandbox Escape Flaws
View all 4Apache Log4j2 contains a critical JNDI injection vulnerability known as 'Log4Shell' that allows unauthenticated remote c
Nginx versions since 0.5.6 up to and including 1.13.2 are vulnerable to integer overflow vulnerability in nginx range fi
The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid
Git contains a CRLF injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-48384, CVSS 8.0) in its config handling that allows attackers to e
Git is an open-source distributed revision control system. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotel
visionmedia send before 0.8.4 for Node.js uses a partial comparison for verifying whether a directory is within the docu
SubTypeValidator.java in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.9.2 mishandles default typing when ehcache is used (becau
Use-after-free vulnerability in the resolver in nginx 0.6.18 through 1.8.0 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 allows remote attacke
An integer overflow flaw which could lead to an out of bounds write was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way pa
An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely ex
The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote
An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved input validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerab
EUVD-2026-104729
GHSA-p5mj-8g2q-pprp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB