Skip to main content

stigmem-node CVE-2026-76245

| EUVDEUVD-2026-62409 HIGH
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity (CWE-345)
2026-08-19 VulnCheck GHSA-rh24-296r-8rj6
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticated peer presents valid federation token
  2. Delivery
    Validator uses mismatched timestamp resolution path
  3. Exploit
    Token age computed incorrectly
  4. Execution
    Valid token flagged as expired
  5. Persist
    Federation authentication rejected
  6. Impact
    Federation flow availability disrupted

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Data authenticity verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires three concurrent conditions: (1) the target node must be running stigmem-node version 0.9.0a1 specifically - no other versions are confirmed affected; (2) the node must have federation peer authentication paths enabled and actively in use, as this code path is not exercised in non-federation deployments; (3) the peer tokens in circulation must have been minted via a non-canonical (non-millisecond) path, creating the timestamp resolution mismatch. Authentication is required: the CVSS vector PR:L confirms that the impacting party must be an authenticated federation peer, not an unauthenticated external actor. The vulnerability does not permit privilege escalation, token forgery, or bypass of authentication - it only causes valid tokens to be erroneously rejected, limiting exploitation to denial of service against federation availability.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H) scores 7.1 and reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity availability impact requiring low privileges - consistent with an authenticated federation peer triggering the broken validation path. Critically, the impact is purely availability (VA:H); confidentiality and integrity are unaffected (VC:N/VI:N), meaning this bug cannot be used to forge tokens, escalate privileges, or access unauthorized data. The 'Information Disclosure' tag in the source metadata appears to be a tagging error - no evidence in the description, CVSS, or advisory supports confidentiality impact; this should be treated as mislabeled and disregarded. No EPSS score was provided, and no CISA KEV listing exists, meaning no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation has been observed. The product is in alpha release (0.9.0a1), which substantially narrows the real-world deployment footprint. Real-world priority is low-to-medium for affected operators: the bug is annoying and availability-impacting for federation flows, but it is not exploitable for data exfiltration or code execution, and the patch is already available.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated federation peer on an affected Stigmem node running 0.9.0a1 presents a legitimately minted peer token over a network federation call. Because the token was minted via a path using a different timestamp resolution than the validator expects, the validator computes the token age incorrectly and rejects it as expired, causing the federation flow to fail. No public exploit code exists; the scenario is a logic-error-induced denial of availability rather than an intentional attack path.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Availability disruption in stigmem-node 0.9.0a1 (pip package by eidetic-labs) allows authenticated federation peers to have their valid peer tokens incorrectly rejected as expired due to a timestamp-handling mismatch in the federation peer-token validation logic. Impacted deployments are Stigmem nodes operating federation peer authentication paths, where authenticated federation flows may fail non-deterministically depending on which token-minting path was used. No active exploitation has been identified (no KEV listing, no public exploit), and the fix is available in 0.9.0a2.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to upgrade to stigmem-node 0.9.0a2 or later, which resolves the timestamp-handling mismatch by standardizing on the canonical millisecond-based validation path. Upgrade via pip using 'pip install --upgrade --pre stigmem-node', or if using the Stigmem meta-package, use 'pip install --upgrade --pre stigmem[node]'. The advisory is at https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/security/advisories/GHSA-xh5j-xjfq-qvvx and the changelog details are at https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/blob/v0.9.0a2/CHANGELOG.md#L14-L35. As a pre-upgrade workaround, the advisory recommends avoiding mixed peer-token minting paths and restricting federation use to tightly controlled peers - this reduces the chance of hitting the mismatched path but does not eliminate the underlying bug. The trade-off of the workaround is reduced federation flexibility and is not a permanent substitute for the patch.

Affected VersionsENISA

stigmem 0 <0.9.0a2

Affected Packages

pypi stigmem-node fix: 0.9.0a2
euvd stigmem fix: 0.9.0a2

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in pypi, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Stigmem-node (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:eidetic-labs:stigmem:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is an alpha-stage Python package distributed via pip that implements a federated node architecture using peer-token-based authentication. The root cause is CWE-345 (Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity): specifically, a mismatch between the timestamp resolution used during peer-token minting and the resolution expected during peer-token validation. When the minting path emits tokens with one timestamp encoding (e.g., seconds-based) and the validation path expects another (milliseconds-based, which is the canonical path fixed in 0.9.0a2), valid tokens are arithmetically compared against the wrong epoch scale and evaluated as expired. The fix introduces a single canonical millisecond-based validation path with regression test coverage. The CWE-345 classification is broadly accurate in that the system fails to correctly authenticate the temporal component of a credential, though it manifests as a false-negative (rejecting valid tokens) rather than the more dangerous false-positive (accepting invalid tokens).

Know when Stigmem gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-accessible federation path requires low-privilege authenticated peer; purely availability impact with no confidentiality or integrity consequence.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 19, 2026 - 15:17 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 19, 2026 - 14:02 cve.org
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionCVE.org

stigmem (pip package stigmem-node) version 0.9.0a1 contains a timestamp-handling mismatch in federation peer-token validation that can cause valid peer tokens to be incorrectly treated as expired. This affects the availability and reliability of authenticated federation flows on nodes using federation peer authentication paths. The issue is fixed in 0.9.0a2, which uses the canonical millisecond-based validation path.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

stigmem-node 0.9.0a1 contains a defect in federation peer-token validation causing valid credentials to be intermittently rejected; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Organizations operating Stigmem node clusters for federation face unpredictable communication disruptions between trusted peers. This impacts network availability and operational resilience for federated deployments.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
alpha-stage niche pip package, minimal enterprise footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy