Skip to main content

Kutethemes Boutique Theme CVE-2026-62098

| EUVDEUVD-2026-96500 MEDIUM
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-10-10 Patchstack GHSA-5xcc-f8xx-r3h4
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify site running Boutique theme ≤2.3.3
  2. Delivery
    Craft request with malicious shortcode payload
  3. Exploit
    Submit to unauthenticated injection point
  4. Execution
    Theme renders attacker shortcode
  5. Impact
    Inject content or disclose limited data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target WordPress site to have the Kutethemes 'Boutique' theme installed and active at version 2.3.3 or earlier; the vulnerable shortcode-handling path must be reachable. Per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N), no authentication and no user interaction are needed, so any internet-facing site meeting the version/theme condition is exposed by default. The primary limiting factor is deployment scope: only sites specifically running this commercial theme are affected, and upgrading past 2.3.3 removes the condition. Impact is bounded to content injection / limited data exposure (C:L/I:L/A:N), not server compromise, despite the 'RCE' tag.

Impact

Signals are moderate and largely consistent. The NVD-style CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring no user interaction - attractive to opportunistic scanning - but the impact metrics (S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N, score 6.5) are deliberately limited: only partial confidentiality and integrity, no availability impact and no scope change. This is tagged 'RCE' and 'Code Injection' (CWE-94), yet the Patchstack title and description scope it to 'arbitrary shortcode execution' / 'content injection' rather than full OS/PHP code execution - the CONFLICT between the 'RCE' tag and the limited C:L/I:L/A:N impact strongly suggests shortcode-level injection, not host takeover; treat 'RCE' with caution and verify against the Patchstack advisory. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were supplied, so there is no evidence of active or at-scale exploitation. Net: a legitimate patch-worthy issue because it is unauthenticated and remote, but the capped impact and absence of exploitation signals place it as medium priority rather than an emergency - prioritize behind any KEV-listed or full-RCE WordPress issues.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request to a WordPress site running the Boutique theme (<= 2.3.3), injecting attacker-controlled shortcodes that the theme renders. This allows the attacker to inject content or trigger shortcode-backed functionality to disclose limited information or tamper with rendered pages. No public proof-of-concept was identified in the provided data.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026

Unauthenticated content injection in the Kutethemes 'Boutique' WordPress theme at version 2.3.3 and earlier lets remote attackers reach a shortcode-handling path and inject arbitrary content into affected sites. No authentication or user interaction is required (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), so any internet-facing WordPress installation with this commercial theme active is exposed by default; the attack surface is bounded to sites running this specific theme. Impact is assessed as limited content injection and partial data exposure (C:L/I:L/A:N) rather than server compromise, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so the practical risk is concentrated in unpatched, theme-deployed sites.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the first action is to confirm the current fixed release for the Kutethemes 'Boutique' theme against the Patchstack advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/kute-boutique/vulnerability/wordpress-boutique-theme-2-3-3-arbitrary-shortcode-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve) and upgrade past 2.3.3 as soon as an updated build is published; because the theme is a commercial product, this may require downloading the new package from the vendor rather than the WordPress.org repository. If no fixed build is available, the strongest compensating control is to deactivate and remove the theme from production sites and switch to a maintained alternative, accepting the loss of the theme's page-layout and styling until a fix ships; for sites that must keep it live, reduce reachability of the shortcode path by disabling open commenting, guest posting, and any untrusted contributor roles, restricting who can submit content that is processed for shortcodes, and reviewing existing posts, pages, widgets, and custom fields for injected shortcode payloads and reverting/removing them. Because the vector is PR:N/UI:N, input-filtering and access restrictions on content submission only partially reduce exposure, and a WAF rule that blocks unexpected shortcode syntax in inbound content is a best-effort layer with the trade-off of false positives on legitimate shortcode usage - it should be treated as a stopgap, not a substitute for upgrading.

Affected VersionsENISA

Boutique n/a ≤2.3.3

Affected Packages

euvd boutique no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw sits in the WordPress shortcode subsystem as implemented by the Kutethemes 'Boutique' theme (CPE cpe:2.3:a:kutethemes:boutique, which covers all versions of the theme). WordPress parses shortcodes such as [example attr="value"] from post, page, and other user-influenced content and passes them to registered handler callbacks; the advisory title ('arbitrary shortcode execution') and the CWE-94 mapping indicate that the theme's handler fails to validate or sanitize the shortcode input it processes, allowing attacker-supplied input to be interpreted as executable shortcode logic rather than inert text. This is the classic code-injection root-cause class where data crosses into an interpreted/executable context without neutralization, so the injected shortcode can drive the theme's callback to emit or alter page content. It is important to distinguish the 'RCE' and 'Code Injection' tags attached to this record from the assessed impact: the authoritative CVSS vector yields only low confidentiality and low integrity with no availability impact (S:U, C:L/I:L/A:N), consistent with content injection and limited data exposure rather than arbitrary server-side code execution. Because the vector is PR:N/UI:N, the vulnerable path is reachable without credentials and without tricking a victim into clicking anything, and the only meaningful gating factor is whether the shortcode-handling code path is reachable on a given deployment.

Know when Boutique gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Unauthenticated remote shortcode injection needs no interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact is limited content injection/disclosure, so C:L/I:L/A:N with no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated Content Injection in Boutique <= 2.3.3 versions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche commercial Kutethemes WordPress theme, modest install base
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy