Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Network endpoint, no UI, and only the attacker's own builder account (PR:L); scope changes as impact crosses into the victim workspace, and Execute/Delete steps yield full C/I/A loss, so A:H rather than the input's A:N.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
7DescriptionNVD
Summary
The webhook trigger endpoint in Budibase is publicly accessible and passes the full HTTP request body into automation execution parameters. A mass assignment vulnerability in externalTrigger() allows an attacker to overwrite the internal appId property by including it in the webhook POST body. When the automation is processed asynchronously (the default path for webhooks without a collect step), the worker executes the attacker-defined automation in the context of the victim's workspace, granting full read/write access to the victim's database.
Details
The webhook trigger route is registered as a public endpoint with no authentication:
// packages/server/src/api/routes/webhook.ts:12
publicRoutes.post("/api/webhooks/trigger/:instance/:id", controller.trigger)The controller passes the raw request body as fields alongside the server-derived appId:
// packages/server/src/api/controllers/webhook.ts:142-148
await triggers.externalTrigger(target, {
fields: {
...ctx.request.body, // attacker-controlled
body: ctx.request.body,
},
appId: prodAppId, // server-controlled
})In externalTrigger(), for webhook-triggered automations, params.fields is spread back into params:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:237-241
params = {
...params, // appId: prodAppId (server-controlled)
...params.fields, // appId: VICTIM_ID (attacker-controlled, overwrites above)
fields: {},
}Because params.fields is spread after params, any key in the attacker's body overwrites the corresponding property in params. An attacker including "appId": "app_VICTIM_WORKSPACE_ID" in the POST body overwrites the legitimate, server-derived appId.
The contaminated params become data.event and are queued asynchronously:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:244,271
const data: AutomationData = { automation, event: params }
// ...
return quotas.addAction(() => automationQueue.add(data, JOB_OPTS))The async worker uses job.data.event.appId to set the workspace context:
// packages/server/src/threads/automation.ts:917,929-930
const workspaceId = job.data.event.appId // attacker-controlled
// ...
return await context.doInAutomationContext({
workspaceId, // victim's workspace
automationId,
task: async () => { /* automation steps run here */ }
})The synchronous path (for webhooks with a collect step) correctly overwrites appId at triggers.ts:264:
data.event = {
...data.event,
appId: context.getWorkspaceId(), // server-controlled fix
automation,
}This proves the developers intended appId to be server-controlled but missed applying the same fix to the async path, which is the default for all webhooks without a collect step.
PoC
Prerequisites: Attacker has builder access to their own Budibase workspace and knows a victim workspace ID (format: app_<uuid>).
Step 1: Attacker creates an automation in their own workspace with a webhook trigger and data-exfiltration steps (e.g., Query Rows → Execute Script to send data externally).
Step 2: Attacker creates a webhook for that automation and notes the webhook URL:
POST /api/webhooks/trigger/<ATTACKER_INSTANCE>/<WEBHOOK_ID>Step 3: Attacker triggers the webhook with the victim's workspace ID injected into the body:
curl -X POST https://budibase.example.com/api/webhooks/trigger/app_ATTACKER_ID/wh_WEBHOOK_ID \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"appId": "app_VICTIM_WORKSPACE_ID", "normalData": "test"}'Expected result: The automation defined in the attacker's workspace executes in the context of the victim's workspace. All database operations (Query Rows, Create Row, Delete Row, Execute Script, etc.) operate on the victim's data.
Additional overridable fields via the same mechanism:
timeout(automation.ts:443-444): override automation execution timeoutuser(automation.ts:413,435): set user context for automation stepsmetadata.automationChainCount(automation.ts:293): bypass chain depth limits
Impact
An attacker with builder access to their own Budibase workspace can execute arbitrary automations (of their own design) in the context of any other workspace on the same Budibase instance, provided they know the victim's workspace ID. This enables:
- Full data exfiltration: Query Rows steps read all tables in the victim's workspace
- Data manipulation: Create Row, Update Row, Delete Row steps modify victim data
- Arbitrary code execution in victim context: Execute Script steps run JavaScript with access to victim's environment variables and database
- Cross-tenant boundary violation: In multi-tenant deployments (Budibase Cloud), the tenant ID is derived from the workspace ID, so the attack crosses tenant boundaries
The attack requires no authentication (the webhook endpoint is public) and leaves minimal audit trail since the automation execution is attributed to the attacker's automation definition but runs in the victim's context.
Recommended Fix
In packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts, apply the same appId fix that exists in the synchronous path to the async path as well. The fix should ensure appId is always server-controlled before queuing:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:244-272
const data: AutomationData = { automation, event: params }
// ... trigger filter check ...
+ // Ensure appId is always server-controlled, not user-supplied
+ data.event.appId = context.getWorkspaceId()
if (getResponses) {
data.event = {
...data.event,
appId: context.getWorkspaceId(),
automation,
}
return quotas.addAction(() =>
executeInThread({ data } as AutomationJob, { onProgress })
)
} else {
return quotas.addAction(() => automationQueue.add(data, JOB_OPTS))
}Alternatively, use an allowlist approach for the webhook field spread to prevent any internal property from being overwritten:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:237-241
const { appId, timeout, user, metadata, ...safeFields } = params.fields
params = {
...params,
...safeFields,
fields: {},
}AnalysisAI
Cross-workspace automation execution in Budibase (npm @budibase/server, all versions before 3.39.9) lets a builder-authenticated attacker run their own automations inside any other workspace on the same instance by overwriting the server-derived appId. The public, unauthenticated webhook trigger endpoint mass-assigns the raw POST body over internal parameters, and because Execute Script steps run JavaScript, this escalates to arbitrary code execution and full data theft in the victim's context. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Exploitation requires (1) builder access to the attacker's OWN Budibase workspace on the target instance - i.e., the ability to create an automation and an associated webhook; (2) knowledge of the victim's workspace ID in the app_<uuid> format; and (3) the targeted automation must take the default ASYNCHRONOUS path, meaning the webhook has NO collect step (webhooks with a collect step use the synchronous path that already re-pins appId and are not vulnerable). … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | Signals are largely consistent toward a genuine high-priority issue, with one notable divergence. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker signs up for a builder account on a shared Budibase instance, builds an automation with a Query Rows step followed by an Execute Script step that exfiltrates results to an external server, and attaches a webhook trigger to it. They then POST to their own webhook URL with {"appId": "app_<victim_uuid>"} in the JSON body; the async worker runs their automation inside the victim's workspace, reading and modifying the victim's database. … |
| Remediation | Vendor-released patch: upgrade @budibase/server to 3.39.9 or later, which re-pins the server-controlled appId on the asynchronous webhook path; this is the primary and complete fix per GHSA-rgvg-3wpc-h44p. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours: Identify all Budibase deployments and determine running versions; note that publicly available exploit code exists, making this an active threat. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-39916
GHSA-rgvg-3wpc-h44p