Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Network endpoint, no UI, and only the attacker's own builder account (PR:L); scope changes as impact crosses into the victim workspace, and Execute/Delete steps yield full C/I/A loss, so A:H rather than the input's A:N.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
7DescriptionNVD
Summary
The webhook trigger endpoint in Budibase is publicly accessible and passes the full HTTP request body into automation execution parameters. A mass assignment vulnerability in externalTrigger() allows an attacker to overwrite the internal appId property by including it in the webhook POST body. When the automation is processed asynchronously (the default path for webhooks without a collect step), the worker executes the attacker-defined automation in the context of the victim's workspace, granting full read/write access to the victim's database.
Details
The webhook trigger route is registered as a public endpoint with no authentication:
// packages/server/src/api/routes/webhook.ts:12
publicRoutes.post("/api/webhooks/trigger/:instance/:id", controller.trigger)The controller passes the raw request body as fields alongside the server-derived appId:
// packages/server/src/api/controllers/webhook.ts:142-148
await triggers.externalTrigger(target, {
fields: {
...ctx.request.body, // attacker-controlled
body: ctx.request.body,
},
appId: prodAppId, // server-controlled
})In externalTrigger(), for webhook-triggered automations, params.fields is spread back into params:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:237-241
params = {
...params, // appId: prodAppId (server-controlled)
...params.fields, // appId: VICTIM_ID (attacker-controlled, overwrites above)
fields: {},
}Because params.fields is spread after params, any key in the attacker's body overwrites the corresponding property in params. An attacker including "appId": "app_VICTIM_WORKSPACE_ID" in the POST body overwrites the legitimate, server-derived appId.
The contaminated params become data.event and are queued asynchronously:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:244,271
const data: AutomationData = { automation, event: params }
// ...
return quotas.addAction(() => automationQueue.add(data, JOB_OPTS))The async worker uses job.data.event.appId to set the workspace context:
// packages/server/src/threads/automation.ts:917,929-930
const workspaceId = job.data.event.appId // attacker-controlled
// ...
return await context.doInAutomationContext({
workspaceId, // victim's workspace
automationId,
task: async () => { /* automation steps run here */ }
})The synchronous path (for webhooks with a collect step) correctly overwrites appId at triggers.ts:264:
data.event = {
...data.event,
appId: context.getWorkspaceId(), // server-controlled fix
automation,
}This proves the developers intended appId to be server-controlled but missed applying the same fix to the async path, which is the default for all webhooks without a collect step.
PoC
Prerequisites: Attacker has builder access to their own Budibase workspace and knows a victim workspace ID (format: app_<uuid>).
Step 1: Attacker creates an automation in their own workspace with a webhook trigger and data-exfiltration steps (e.g., Query Rows → Execute Script to send data externally).
Step 2: Attacker creates a webhook for that automation and notes the webhook URL:
POST /api/webhooks/trigger/<ATTACKER_INSTANCE>/<WEBHOOK_ID>Step 3: Attacker triggers the webhook with the victim's workspace ID injected into the body:
curl -X POST https://budibase.example.com/api/webhooks/trigger/app_ATTACKER_ID/wh_WEBHOOK_ID \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"appId": "app_VICTIM_WORKSPACE_ID", "normalData": "test"}'Expected result: The automation defined in the attacker's workspace executes in the context of the victim's workspace. All database operations (Query Rows, Create Row, Delete Row, Execute Script, etc.) operate on the victim's data.
Additional overridable fields via the same mechanism:
timeout(automation.ts:443-444): override automation execution timeoutuser(automation.ts:413,435): set user context for automation stepsmetadata.automationChainCount(automation.ts:293): bypass chain depth limits
Impact
An attacker with builder access to their own Budibase workspace can execute arbitrary automations (of their own design) in the context of any other workspace on the same Budibase instance, provided they know the victim's workspace ID. This enables:
- Full data exfiltration: Query Rows steps read all tables in the victim's workspace
- Data manipulation: Create Row, Update Row, Delete Row steps modify victim data
- Arbitrary code execution in victim context: Execute Script steps run JavaScript with access to victim's environment variables and database
- Cross-tenant boundary violation: In multi-tenant deployments (Budibase Cloud), the tenant ID is derived from the workspace ID, so the attack crosses tenant boundaries
The attack requires no authentication (the webhook endpoint is public) and leaves minimal audit trail since the automation execution is attributed to the attacker's automation definition but runs in the victim's context.
Recommended Fix
In packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts, apply the same appId fix that exists in the synchronous path to the async path as well. The fix should ensure appId is always server-controlled before queuing:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:244-272
const data: AutomationData = { automation, event: params }
// ... trigger filter check ...
+ // Ensure appId is always server-controlled, not user-supplied
+ data.event.appId = context.getWorkspaceId()
if (getResponses) {
data.event = {
...data.event,
appId: context.getWorkspaceId(),
automation,
}
return quotas.addAction(() =>
executeInThread({ data } as AutomationJob, { onProgress })
)
} else {
return quotas.addAction(() => automationQueue.add(data, JOB_OPTS))
}Alternatively, use an allowlist approach for the webhook field spread to prevent any internal property from being overwritten:
// packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:237-241
const { appId, timeout, user, metadata, ...safeFields } = params.fields
params = {
...params,
...safeFields,
fields: {},
}AnalysisAI
Cross-workspace automation execution in Budibase (npm @budibase/server, all versions before 3.39.9) lets a builder-authenticated attacker run their own automations inside any other workspace on the same instance by overwriting the server-derived appId. The public, unauthenticated webhook trigger endpoint mass-assigns the raw POST body over internal parameters, and because Execute Script steps run JavaScript, this escalates to arbitrary code execution and full data theft in the victim's context. A detailed proof-of-concept is published in the vendor advisory (GHSA-rgvg-3wpc-h44p); publicly available exploit code exists, though it is not listed in CISA KEV and EPSS exploitation probability is modest at 0.41% (33rd percentile).
Technical ContextAI
Budibase is an open-source low-code platform for building internal tools, where each tenant/customer is isolated into a 'workspace' identified by an appId of the form app_<uuid>. The flaw is a CWE-915 (Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes - i.e., mass assignment) issue in the automations engine. The public route packages/server/src/api/routes/webhook.ts registers POST /api/webhooks/trigger/:instance/:id with no authentication; the controller forwards the entire ctx.request.body as fields alongside a trusted server-derived appId. Inside externalTrigger() (triggers.ts:237-241) the async path spreads params.fields AFTER params, so any attacker-supplied key - notably appId, but also timeout, user, and metadata.automationChainCount - clobbers the server value. The contaminated event is queued, and the async worker (threads/automation.ts:917,929) reads job.data.event.appId to set the workspace context via doInAutomationContext, executing the attacker's steps against the victim tenant. The synchronous (collect-step) path already re-pins appId to context.getWorkspaceId() at triggers.ts:264, confirming the intended invariant was simply not applied to the default async path.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade @budibase/server to 3.39.9 or later, which re-pins the server-controlled appId on the asynchronous webhook path; this is the primary and complete fix per GHSA-rgvg-3wpc-h44p. If you cannot upgrade immediately, the most effective compensating control is to restrict the unauthenticated route /api/webhooks/trigger/:instance/:id at a reverse proxy or WAF (e.g., require an auth header or a source-IP allowlist), accepting the side effect that all webhook-driven automations stop firing until the rule is relaxed. As a narrower stopgap, add a collect step to existing webhook automations so they take the synchronous path that already re-pins appId, though this changes automation behavior and does not protect automations you do not control. In multi-tenant/cloud contexts also consider temporarily limiting builder-account self-registration to shrink the pool of potential attackers. Track and apply the fix and advisory at https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/advisories/GHSA-rgvg-3wpc-h44p.
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-39916
GHSA-rgvg-3wpc-h44p