Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify exposed Stud.IP instance
-
DeliverySend crafted request to store() endpoint
-
ExploitInject SQL via unsanitized parameter
-
ExecutionExtract data and write malicious payload
-
PersistExecute arbitrary code on host
-
ImpactExfiltrate database and pivot
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network access to a Stud.IP instance running 6.0.x before 6.0.3 or 5.4.x before 5.4.12 and the ability to reach a request path that feeds attacker-controlled input into one of the vulnerable store() persistence functions. The supplied CVSS vector rates this PR:N/UI:N (no authentication, no user interaction), but because store() operations are persistence routines typically invoked within a logged-in session, defenders should verify whether a valid low-privilege account is actually needed - this is the main factor that would limit real-world exploitation. There is no user-interaction or non-default-configuration requirement stated; the primary limiting factors are network exposure of the instance and the still-unconfirmed authentication prerequisite. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:N, score 9.1) describes network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with high confidentiality and integrity impact - a serious profile. However, the vulnerable sink is described as store() functions, which in an LMS typically execute within an authenticated persistence workflow, so the PR:N (unauthenticated) rating is worth verifying against the vendor advisory; the description and CVSS diverge on whether a session is required. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, or KEV entry was supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input, and there is no evidence of active exploitation - the strongest exploitation signal is a public technical write-up. Even a mid-sized university IT team should treat this as urgent because a working SQLi write-up materially lowers the barrier to exploitation and the integrity/RCE impact threatens the whole database and potentially the host. Net assessment: genuine high priority for anyone running the affected branches, tempered by unconfirmed authentication prerequisites and no confirmed in-the-wild activity. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker sends a crafted HTTP request to a Stud.IP endpoint that routes user input into a store() function, injecting SQL that extracts credentials or session data and manipulates records. Following the technique described in the public researcher write-up, the attacker chains the injection into file-write or code-execution primitives to run arbitrary code on the LMS host, compromising all student and course data. Low attack complexity and network reachability make this practical against exposed instances. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 17, 2026
SQL injection in Stud.IP (an open-source learning management system widely used in German-speaking higher education) affects the 6.0.x branch before 6.0.3 and the 5.4.x branch before 5.4.12, where unsanitized input reaching store() persistence functions lets a remote attacker read and manipulate database contents and, per the researcher's write-up, escalate to arbitrary code execution. The flaw carries a CVSS 9.1 (C:H/I:H) rating with a public technical write-up available from the reporting researcher; there is no public exploit identified as weaponized and no CISA KEV listing at time of analysis. Organizations running the affected LMS branches should treat this as high priority given the confidentiality and integrity impact combined with the RCE claim.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to a fixed release: Vendor-released patch 6.0.3 for the 6.0.x branch and 5.4.12 for the 5.4.x branch, per the vendor release notes at https://gitlab.studip.de/studip/studip/-/releases/v6.0.3. Apply the upgrade promptly since SQL injection with an integrity/RCE impact cannot be reliably mitigated by input filtering alone. If immediate patching is impossible, compensating controls include placing the affected endpoints behind a WAF with SQLi signatures tuned to the request parameters feeding the store() functions (accepting that WAF rules can be bypassed and may block legitimate form submissions), restricting network access to the LMS to trusted campus networks or VPN, and reducing the database account's privileges (removing FILE/write and OS-command capabilities) to limit escalation from injection to RCE - noting this may break features that legitimately require broader DB rights. Consult the researcher write-up at https://simon.hilchenba.ch/blog/studip-sql-injection/ and the NVD record at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-51346 for detail.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Stud.IP (Studienbegleitender Internetsupport von Präsenzlehre) is a PHP-based learning management platform for universities. The root cause is CWE-89 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command): user-controllable input is concatenated into SQL statements within store() persistence routines rather than being passed through parameterized queries or a properly escaping ORM layer. Because SQLi in a PHP/MySQL stack can often be chained into file writes or code execution paths, the reporter characterizes the impact as reaching RCE, not merely data disclosure. The provided CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*) is a placeholder and carries no product identification value, so affected-product identification relies on the vendor release notes and description.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
store() persistence sinks are typically reached through an authenticated session, so PR:L; SQLi yields full DB read/write and, per the vendor write-up, escalates to code execution, so C/I/A all High.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
SQL Injection vulnerability in StudIP 6.0.x before 6.0.3 and 5.4.x before 5.4.12 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the store() functions.
Executive ViewAI
Stud.IP, a widely-deployed learning management system in German-speaking higher education, contains a critical SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-51346) affecting versions 6.0.x before 6.0.3 and 5.4.x before 5.4.12 with no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though remote attackers can read and modify database contents including student records and academic data. The vulnerability includes documented potential for arbitrary code execution, creating immediate exposure to student privacy breach, FERPA/GDPR violations, and institutional operational compromise. With no vendor patch currently available, affected institutions require urgent containment to prevent data theft and loss of institutional control.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: deploy Web Application Firewall with SQL injection signatures and rate-limiting; restrict Stud.IP network access to known institutional IP ranges; enable detailed database transaction audit logging and anomaly alerting; conduct code review of user input validation and database query construction in affected Stud.IP branches; maintain current database backups and implement file integrity monitoring; monitor for unusual database access patterns or data extraction queries.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
EUVD-2026-60312
GHSA-mjrh-fqmp-4ff2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB