Skip to main content

Ingenic T31 SoC CVE-2026-50720

| EUVDEUVD-2026-62480 MEDIUM
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-08-19 mitre GHSA-gpwr-rgpw-7w8q
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY
6.4 MEDIUM
AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI
6.4 MEDIUM

Physical boot media write access required (AV:P); specialized embedded RE expertise needed (AC:H); no software privileges required (PR:N); full firmware compromise yields complete CIA impact (C:H/I:H/A:H).

3.1 AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Physical
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Generated
Aug 24, 2026 - 22:33 vuln.today
CVSS changed
Aug 24, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
6.4 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Aug 19, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

The Ingenic T31 SoC boot ROM flash-boot verification path compares only a single 32-bit word of the RSA signature output against a single 32-bit word of the SHA-256 payload digest, rather than compare the full data. This allows an attacker with physical write access to boot media to forge modified SPL (Secondary Program Loader) images that pass secure boot verification without possession of the OEM signing key. Each forgery attempt succeeds with approximately 2/3 probability. This has been validated via reverse engineering, software emulation against vendor-signed images, and end-to-end hardware acceptance of a forged firmware image on a Wyze Video Doorbell v2 (T31X).

AnalysisAI

Secure boot bypass in the Ingenic T31 SoC allows an attacker with physical write access to boot media to forge SPL (Secondary Program Loader) images that pass RSA signature verification without the OEM signing key. The boot ROM's flash-boot verification path compares only a single 32-bit word of the RSA signature output against a single 32-bit word of the SHA-256 payload digest - rather than validating the full cryptographic outputs - yielding a forgery success rate of approximately 2/3 per attempt. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Recon
technique details hidden
Delivery
technique details hidden
Exploit
technique details hidden
Install
technique details hidden
C2
technique details hidden
Execute
technique details hidden
Impact
technique details hidden

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Exploitation requires physical write access to the boot media (NAND flash, eMMC, or SD card) of an Ingenic T31-based device - this is the absolute prerequisite and cannot be circumvented remotely. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment CVSS AV:P correctly limits the threat surface to actors with physical access to boot media, ruling out remote or network exploitation entirely - the EPSS score of 0.15% at the 5th percentile accurately reflects this constraint. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario Full exploit scenario with step-by-step reproduction available after sign-in.
Remediation No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis for this boot ROM vulnerability; the flaw resides in mask ROM and cannot be corrected via software update in deployed hardware. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

CVE-2013-3900 MEDIUM
5.5 Dec 11

Why is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update

CVE-2026-48558 CRITICAL POC
9.5 Jun 12

Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2025-59718 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 09

Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to

CVE-2025-25291 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2025-25292 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2022-25898 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 01

The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT

CVE-2024-42004 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti

CVE-2024-41145 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27

CVE-2024-41138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work

CVE-2024-45409 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 10

The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), t

CVE-2022-35929 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 04

cosign is a container signing and verification utility. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote

CVE-2022-31053 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 13

Biscuit is an authentication and authorization token for microservices architectures. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8)

Share

CVE-2026-50720 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy