Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local or administrative access to EMS server
-
DeliveryIdentify hard-coded cryptographic keys
-
ExploitExtract keys from application files or memory
-
ExecutionDecrypt sensitive management traffic
-
PersistForge admin credentials or inject policies
-
ImpactCompromise endpoint fleet
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Key management, no hard-coded keys
|
| Impact | CVSS 6.0 with AV:L (local attack vector) and PR:H (high privilege required) indicates moderate severity with significant access barriers. The local attack vector eliminates remote exploitation paths, and the requirement for high-privilege authentication (administrator level) means this is primarily a post-compromise or insider threat scenario. However, CVSS does not fully capture the cryptographic impact-a leaked hard-coded key can enable persistent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and decryption of sensitive management traffic indefinitely across all managed endpoints using FortiClientEMS. The ENISA EUVD classification confirms two affected version branches (7.4.0-7.4.1 and 7.4.3-7.4.5), suggesting a systemic implementation issue rather than a narrow code defect. Real-world risk is elevated for organizations where administrative-level compromise is plausible (privileged account abuse, malware targeting admins, supply-chain attacks on MSPs), making this a meaningful security control failure despite the high privilege barrier. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A system administrator at an organization is compromised via phishing or malware, or a malicious insider with administrative credentials gains access to the FortiClientEMS server. The attacker uses elevated privileges to extract the hard-coded cryptographic keys from the application configuration or binary. With these keys, the attacker can decrypt encrypted FortiClientEMS management traffic, forge authentication tokens, access endpoint compliance data, or inject malicious policies affecting thousands of managed endpoints without being detected by normal logs. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Apr 14, 2026
Hard-coded cryptographic keys in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.5 allow local authenticated attackers with high privileges to disclose sensitive information and potentially modify system configurations. An attacker with administrative access can extract or leverage these embedded keys to compromise confidentiality and integrity of protected data. This vulnerability requires local access and elevated privileges, limiting but not eliminating real-world risk in multi-user or compromised endpoint scenarios.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Fortinet FortiClientEMS to a patched version released after 7.4.5, which should include cryptographic key remediation and secure key management implementation. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should restrict administrative access to FortiClientEMS systems to only essential personnel, enforce multi-factor authentication for administrative logins, monitor for unauthorized access to cryptographic material or configuration files, and consider network segmentation of the EMS server to reduce lateral movement risk if an admin account is compromised. Consult the Fortinet PSIRT advisory at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-107 for the exact patched version availability and timeline.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
FortiClientEMS (Endpoint Management Server) versions 7.4.0 to 7.4.5 contain hard-coded cryptographic keys embedded in the application code or configuration files. CWE-321 (Use of Hard-Coded Cryptographic Key) represents a fundamental cryptographic implementation flaw where keys are static and discoverable through reverse engineering, code analysis, or file examination rather than being dynamically generated or securely managed. This allows attackers to decrypt encrypted communications, authenticate as the application, or access protected credentials. The vulnerability is rooted in insecure cryptographic practices and affects the CPE cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientems, which is Fortinet's centralized management solution for FortiClient endpoints across enterprise networks.
Know when Fortinet gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.5 may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here>
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an
Fortinet FortiWeb contains a relative path traversal allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute administrative comman
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi
Fortinet FortiWeb contains an authenticated OS command injection allowing privilege escalation to execute unauthorized c
FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet a
Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9
Unauthenticated path traversal in Fortinet FortiMail (7.2.0-7.2.9, 7.4.0-7.4.8, 7.6.0-7.6.6 and 8.0.0-8.0.1) lets a remo
OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth
EUVD-2026-22339
GHSA-pgp9-vrph-v4j2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB