Skip to main content

Fortinet EUVDEUVD-2026-22339

| CVE-2026-39810 MEDIUM
Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key (CWE-321)
2026-04-14 fortinet GHSA-pgp9-vrph-v4j2
6.0
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local or administrative access to EMS server
  2. Delivery
    Identify hard-coded cryptographic keys
  3. Exploit
    Extract keys from application files or memory
  4. Execution
    Decrypt sensitive management traffic
  5. Persist
    Forge admin credentials or inject policies
  6. Impact
    Compromise endpoint fleet

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Key management, no hard-coded keys
Impact

CVSS 6.0 with AV:L (local attack vector) and PR:H (high privilege required) indicates moderate severity with significant access barriers. The local attack vector eliminates remote exploitation paths, and the requirement for high-privilege authentication (administrator level) means this is primarily a post-compromise or insider threat scenario. However, CVSS does not fully capture the cryptographic impact-a leaked hard-coded key can enable persistent unauthorized access, lateral movement, and decryption of sensitive management traffic indefinitely across all managed endpoints using FortiClientEMS. The ENISA EUVD classification confirms two affected version branches (7.4.0-7.4.1 and 7.4.3-7.4.5), suggesting a systemic implementation issue rather than a narrow code defect. Real-world risk is elevated for organizations where administrative-level compromise is plausible (privileged account abuse, malware targeting admins, supply-chain attacks on MSPs), making this a meaningful security control failure despite the high privilege barrier.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A system administrator at an organization is compromised via phishing or malware, or a malicious insider with administrative credentials gains access to the FortiClientEMS server. The attacker uses elevated privileges to extract the hard-coded cryptographic keys from the application configuration or binary. With these keys, the attacker can decrypt encrypted FortiClientEMS management traffic, forge authentication tokens, access endpoint compliance data, or inject malicious policies affecting thousands of managed endpoints without being detected by normal logs.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Apr 14, 2026

Hard-coded cryptographic keys in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.5 allow local authenticated attackers with high privileges to disclose sensitive information and potentially modify system configurations. An attacker with administrative access can extract or leverage these embedded keys to compromise confidentiality and integrity of protected data. This vulnerability requires local access and elevated privileges, limiting but not eliminating real-world risk in multi-user or compromised endpoint scenarios.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Fortinet FortiClientEMS to a patched version released after 7.4.5, which should include cryptographic key remediation and secure key management implementation. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should restrict administrative access to FortiClientEMS systems to only essential personnel, enforce multi-factor authentication for administrative logins, monitor for unauthorized access to cryptographic material or configuration files, and consider network segmentation of the EMS server to reduce lateral movement risk if an admin account is compromised. Consult the Fortinet PSIRT advisory at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-107 for the exact patched version availability and timeline.

Affected VersionsENISA

FortiClientEMS 7.4.3 ≤7.4.5
FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 ≤7.4.1

Affected Packages

euvd forticlientems no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

FortiClientEMS (Endpoint Management Server) versions 7.4.0 to 7.4.5 contain hard-coded cryptographic keys embedded in the application code or configuration files. CWE-321 (Use of Hard-Coded Cryptographic Key) represents a fundamental cryptographic implementation flaw where keys are static and discoverable through reverse engineering, code analysis, or file examination rather than being dynamically generated or securely managed. This allows attackers to decrypt encrypted communications, authenticate as the application, or access protected credentials. The vulnerability is rooted in insecure cryptographic practices and affects the CPE cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientems, which is Fortinet's centralized management solution for FortiClient endpoints across enterprise networks.

Know when Fortinet gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.0 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Apr 14, 2026 - 16:22 NVD
5.2 (MEDIUM) 6.0 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Apr 14, 2026 - 15:38 nvd
MEDIUM 6.0

DescriptionCVE.org

A use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.5 may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here>

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 99% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2022-40684 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 18

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an

CVE-2025-64446 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 14

Fortinet FortiWeb contains a relative path traversal allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute administrative comman

CVE-2024-55591 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote

CVE-2024-21762 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 09

A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0

CVE-2023-27997 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 13

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi

CVE-2025-58034 HIGH POC
7.2 Nov 18

Fortinet FortiWeb contains an authenticated OS command injection allowing privilege escalation to execute unauthorized c

CVE-2020-12812 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 24

FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication

CVE-2016-1909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 15

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0

CVE-2023-34992 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 10

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet a

CVE-2016-6909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 24

Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9

CVE-2026-104286 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 01

Unauthenticated path traversal in Fortinet FortiMail (7.2.0-7.2.9, 7.4.0-7.4.8, 7.6.0-7.6.6 and 8.0.0-8.0.1) lets a remo

CVE-2026-39808 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy