Tenda G0
CVE-2026-36805
HIGH
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach Tenda G0 HTTP interface
-
DeliveryCraft POST with oversized qqStr/markStr
-
ExploitSubmit request to Saveqqlist endpoint
-
ExecutionOverflow stack buffer in httpd
-
PersistCrash management daemon and router
-
ImpactNetwork outage until reboot
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Attacker must be able to reach the Tenda G0 web management interface over HTTP and submit a request to the Saveqqlist handler with attacker-controlled qqStr or markStr parameters; CVSS PR:N and UI:N indicate no authentication or user interaction is required against firmware v15.11.0.5. Realistic exploitation is limited to deployments where the management UI is reachable from the attacker's network position - by default Tenda routers expose the UI only on the LAN, so internet-borne exploitation requires that an administrator has enabled remote/WAN management or port-forwarded the admin interface. Other limits: only firmware v15.11.0.5 is confirmed affected by the description, and impact is restricted to denial of service (no confirmed code execution). |
| Impact | Signals point in opposite directions and require careful weighing. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H describes a fully remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity attack with high availability impact but no confidentiality or integrity loss - consistent with a pure DoS. EPSS of 0.01% (2nd percentile) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis suggest exploitation activity is currently negligible, and the CVE is not on CISA KEV. The CWE-121 classification and description language only claim DoS, not code execution, even though stack overflows on embedded MIPS/ARM devices can sometimes be escalated; absent a working PoC demonstrating control of EIP/PC, this should be treated as the vendor states. The CPE field is a generic 'n/a:n/a' placeholder, which limits automated asset matching and is a data-quality gap defenders should be aware of. Net assessment: medium real-world priority for organizations that expose Tenda G0 management to untrusted networks, low priority where management is restricted to a LAN segment. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker on the same network as a Tenda G0 router - or on the internet if the web UI is WAN-exposed - sends a single crafted HTTP POST to the Saveqqlist endpoint with an overlong qqStr or markStr value. The oversized parameter overflows the fixed stack buffer, crashing the embedded httpd process and knocking the router (and the network behind it) offline until it reboots or is manually power-cycled. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the bug class is trivial to reproduce once the endpoint and parameter names are known, both of which are disclosed in this CVE. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 10, 2026
Denial of service in Tenda G0 router firmware v15.11.0.5 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the device by sending a crafted HTTP request that triggers stack-based buffer overflows in the Saveqqlist function via the qqStr and markStr parameters. CVSS 7.5 reflects the network-reachable, no-privilege availability impact, while EPSS sits at 0.01% (2nd percentile) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis indicates limited near-term opportunistic exploitation despite the easy attack profile.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - no Tenda advisory or fixed firmware version is present in the provided data. Operators of Tenda G0 v15.11.0.5 should monitor https://www.tendacn.com for a firmware update and apply it once released. As compensating controls, disable remote/WAN-side access to the device's HTTP management interface (this prevents internet-borne exploitation but does not protect against a malicious LAN client), restrict the management interface to a dedicated management VLAN or specific source IPs via ACL (trade-off: legitimate admins must connect from that segment), and place the router behind an upstream firewall or reverse proxy that rejects oversized qqStr/markStr POST parameters (trade-off: requires knowing the exact request shape and may break legitimate save operations if limits are set too tightly). If the qqlist (QQ buddy list) management feature is unused, avoid invoking it; note this is a hardening step, not a fix, since the endpoint remains reachable. The only reference link available for further detail is the researcher's repository at https://github.com/xhh0124/SemVulLLM/tree/main/PW201A/L7IM.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Tenda G0 is a small-business VPN/gateway router whose web management interface exposes an HTTP endpoint backed by the Saveqqlist handler. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow): the qqStr and markStr request parameters are copied into fixed-size stack buffers without proper length validation, so an oversized value corrupts the saved return address or adjacent stack frames. Because the affected function lives in the router's embedded HTTP server (typically a single-process httpd on MIPS/ARM firmware), corrupting the stack reliably crashes the management daemon and, depending on watchdog behavior, the device itself. The NVD CPE entry is recorded only as a placeholder (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*), so canonical product matching must rely on the description's explicit naming of Tenda G0 firmware v15.11.0.5.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Shenzhen Tenda Technology Co., Ltd Tenda G0 v15.11.0.5 was discovered to contain multiple buffer overflows in the Saveqqlist function via the qqStr and markStr parameters. These vulnerabilities allow attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP request.
Executive ViewAI
Tenda G0 routers running firmware v15.11.0.5 expose organizations to uncontrolled network disruption; attackers can crash affected devices remotely without credentials. This vulnerability demands immediate attention because routers are foundational infrastructure-any outage cascades to end-user connectivity and operational continuity. With no vendor patch currently available, inventory and network access controls are critical interim protections.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement network segmentation restricting management interface access to authorized administrative subnets only; deploy IDS/IPS signatures detecting HTTP requests with malformed qqStr and markStr parameters; establish continuous device availability monitoring with alerting thresholds; implement network redundancy or failover routers to maintain service continuity if primary device becomes unavailable.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB