Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCreate symlink in partials directory
-
ExploitPoint symlink outside allowed root
-
ExecutionRender template using include/layout tag
-
ImpactLoad arbitrary file via symlink traversal
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling UNIX symlink resolution
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Attacker must place a symlink inside the configured partials or layouts directory of a LiquidJS application. The symlink must point outside that directory. Victim's LiquidJS template must load the symlink via {% include %}, {% render %}, or {% layout %} tags. Requires ability to write files to the partials/layouts directory. |
| Impact | Real-world risk is moderate and highly context-dependent. Without CVSS vector data, assessment relies on impact analysis and deployment patterns. The vulnerability requires authenticated access to create symlinks within template directories, significantly limiting attack surface compared to unauthenticated remote exploits. SSVC technical impact is partial (information disclosure only, no code execution or data modification). Exploitation is not automatable as it requires specific filesystem access and knowledge of target file paths. Primary risk scenarios include multi-tenant CMS platforms where users upload themes, collaborative template repositories where contributors have filesystem access, or containerized environments with mounted volumes. In hardened production deployments with read-only template directories and strict filesystem permissions, exploitability is minimal. The availability of public POC code demonstrates feasibility but the authentication and filesystem access prerequisites prevent widespread exploitation. Organizations using LiquidJS with untrusted template sources should prioritize patching, while those with strictly controlled template directories face lower immediate risk. The canonical path resolution issue is a common oversight in filesystem security controls, making this a valuable case study for secure file handling patterns. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with contributor access to a multi-tenant blogging platform uploads a custom theme package containing a malicious symlink in the partials directory. The symlink named evil.liquid points to /etc/passwd on the host system. When administrators preview the theme or the template is rendered, LiquidJS processes {% render "evil.liquid" %} and validates that partials/evil.liquid falls within the allowed template root. Since validation occurs on the symlink path rather than the target, the check passes. The filesystem then follows the symlink during file read operations, causing LiquidJS to render the contents of /etc/passwd into the template output. The attacker exfiltrates sensitive system information including user accounts and configuration details through the rendered page content. Publicly available exploit code exists demonstrating the technique with minimal complexity. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Apr 08, 2026
Path traversal via symlink in LiquidJS npm package allows authenticated template contributors to read arbitrary filesystem content outside configured template roots. The vulnerability affects applications where untrusted users can influence template directories (uploaded themes, extracted archives, repository-controlled templates). LiquidJS validates template paths using string-based directory containment checks but fails to resolve canonical filesystem paths before file access, enabling symlinks placed within allowed partials/layouts directories to reference external files. Publicly available exploit code exists. No EPSS score available, but impact is limited to information disclosure in specific deployment scenarios requiring attacker filesystem access.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to LiquidJS version 10.25.3 or later, which resolves canonical filesystem paths before applying directory containment checks. The vendor-released patch is available via npm package update and documented in GitHub release tag v10.25.3 at github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.25.3. The fix implementation is detailed in pull request github.com/harttle/liquidjs/pull/867. For immediate mitigation before patching, implement defense-in-depth controls including restricting filesystem permissions on template directories to prevent symlink creation by untrusted users, enabling operating system symlink protections (nosymfollow mount options on Linux, symlink evaluation policies on Windows), and implementing application-layer validation to detect and reject symlink files during template upload or processing. Applications should audit existing template directories for unauthorized symlinks using find commands or filesystem scanning tools. Review access controls for template management interfaces to ensure only trusted administrators can modify template directory contents. Consider containerization with read-only template volumes for production deployments. Full technical details and security advisory available at github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-56p5-8mhr-2fph.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in npm
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
LiquidJS is a JavaScript template engine implementing Shopify's Liquid template language for Node.js environments. The vulnerability stems from CWE-61 (UNIX Symbolic Link Following) in the template inclusion mechanism. When processing {% include %}, {% render %}, and {% layout %} directives, LiquidJS performs pathname-based validation against configured root directories without calling realpath() or fs.realpathSync() to resolve symlinks before file operations. The security boundary relies on string prefix matching of the requested path rather than validating the canonical location of the actual file being read. This allows TOCTOU-style bypass where the path validation succeeds on the symlink location but filesystem operations follow the link to read external content. The vulnerability affects the core template resolution logic in the npm package pkg:npm/liquidjs, impacting all applications using partials or layouts features with untrusted template sources.
Know when Canonical gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
LiquidJS enforces partial and layout root restrictions using the resolved pathname string, but it does not resolve the canonical filesystem path before opening the file. A symlink placed inside an allowed partials or layouts directory can therefore point to a file outside that directory and still be loaded.
Details
For {% include %}, {% render %}, and {% layout %}, LiquidJS checks whether the candidate path is inside the configured partials or layouts roots before reading it. That check is path-based, not realpath-based.
Because of that, a file like partials/link.liquid passes the directory containment check as long as its pathname is under the allowed root. If link.liquid is actually a symlink to a file outside the allowed root, the filesystem follows the symlink when the file is opened and LiquidJS renders the external target.
So the restriction is applied to the path string that was requested, not to the file that is actually read.
This matters in environments where an attacker can place templates or otherwise influence files under a trusted template root, including uploaded themes, extracted archives, mounted content, or repository-controlled template trees.
PoC
const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');
const fs = require('fs');
fs.rmSync('/tmp/liquid-root', { recursive: true, force: true });
fs.mkdirSync('/tmp/liquid-root', { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/secret-outside.liquid', 'SECRET_OUTSIDE');
fs.symlinkSync('/tmp/secret-outside.liquid', '/tmp/liquid-root/link.liquid');
const engine = new Liquid({ root: ['/tmp/liquid-root'] });
engine.parseAndRender('{% render "link.liquid" %}')
.then(console.log);
// SECRET_OUTSIDEImpact
If an attacker can place or influence symlinks under a trusted partials or layouts directory, they can make LiquidJS read and render files outside the intended template root. In practice this can expose arbitrary readable files reachable through symlink targets.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-35525 is a path traversal vulnerability in the LiquidJS npm package that allows authenticated template contributors to read arbitrary files from the server's filesystem. Organizations using LiquidJS with user-uploaded templates, theme systems, or externally-sourced template repositories face unauthorized data exposure risk, particularly if sensitive configuration files, source code, or customer data are stored on the same server.
Apply vendor patch. If immediate patching is impossible: (1) Restrict template directory write access to application-only processes, removing user-level upload capabilities; (2) Implement filesystem-level symlink restrictions using mount options (nofollow) or SELinux policies on template directories; (3) Apply principle of least privilege-ensure application runs with minimal filesystem permissions outside template roots; (4) Monitor filesystem access patterns for unauthorized file reads outside intended template locations.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Related Vulnerabilities in LiquidJS Path Traversal and Memory Issues
View all 3Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug
In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it
GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which
Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using
The (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN, and (8) PLT coders in ImageMagick before 6.
When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTT
Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe
Race condition in mm/gup.c in the Linux kernel 2.x through 4.x before 4.8.3 allows local users to gain privileges by lev
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, and
Local privilege escalation in the GNU C Library (glibc) dynamic loader ld.so allows unprivileged local users on affected
EUVD-2026-20594
GHSA-56p5-8mhr-2fph
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB