Skip to main content

Seppmail CVE-2026-29137

| EUVDEUVD-2026-18154 MEDIUM
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-04-02 NCSC.ch
5.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: NCSC.ch
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Impact

Despite the absence of a CVSS score in the input data, the vulnerability carries moderate real-world risk. The attack vector is remote and requires no authentication (attacker sends email), with low complexity (simply crafting a long subject line), resulting in low technical impact (information disclosure of security metadata rather than data exfiltration or code execution). However, the practical impact is significant: security tags are a critical last-mile defense against phishing and social engineering. By hiding these tags, attackers can increase success rates of spear-phishing campaigns targeting enterprise users, particularly in environments where security-conscious employees rely on gateway indicators. The lack of CVSS and EPSS data prevents quantitative comparison, but this is functionally a medium-priority issue: not as severe as RCE or authentication bypass, but more serious than minor information leaks because it directly undermines user security decision-making. No KEV status or POC availability is reported, suggesting limited active exploitation at time of analysis.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a phishing email with a legitimately formatted From: header (spoofing a trusted sender) but includes an extremely long Subject: line (e.g., 500+ characters of padding text). The email is sent to a target user whose organization uses SEPPmail Gateway. Upon delivery, the gateway processes the email but fails to render the expected security tag (e.g., 'PHISHING RISK' or 'EXTERNAL') due to the subject line length triggering the rendering bypass. The user receives the email in their inbox without any visual indicator that it is suspicious, increasing the likelihood they will click a malicious link or credential-theft attachment. The attacker gains access to the user's account or systems without the security tag having alerted the user to the email's untrusted nature.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Apr 02, 2026

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows remote attackers to conceal security tags from end users by submitting emails with excessively long subject lines, enabling potential phishing and message spoofing attacks by bypassing visual security indicators. The vulnerability affects all versions prior to 15.0.3 across the product line and has been reported by Switzerland's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC.ch). No active exploitation has been confirmed, and no public exploit code is currently available.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway version 15.0.3 and later. Organizations running SEPPmail should upgrade immediately to version 15.0.3 or higher. No workarounds for this vulnerability are documented; patching is the primary mitigation. For detailed upgrade procedures and release notes, refer to the vendor's release notes at https://downloads.seppmail.com/extrelnotes/150/ERN15.0.html#seppmail-vulnerability-disclosure-1503. Administrators should verify successful deployment of the patched version and confirm that security tag rendering is functioning correctly on representative test emails.

Affected VersionsENISA

Secure Email Gateway 0 <15.0.3

Affected Packages

euvd secure_email_gateway fix: 15.0.3

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway is an email security appliance that applies cryptographic signatures and security tags to classify messages (legitimate, phishing risk, etc.) for end-user awareness. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation (CWE-20: Improper Input Validation) in the subject line processing logic. When a subject line exceeds a certain length threshold, the gateway's tag-rendering engine fails to properly display or apply security tags to the message presentation layer. This allows an attacker to craft emails with intentionally long subjects that cause the security tag display mechanism to be bypassed or truncated, leaving recipients without visual indicators of message authenticity or risk classification. The issue is not a cryptographic weakness but a user interface bypass in the email client rendering layer.

Know when Seppmail gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (NCSC.ch) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (NCSC.ch) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: NCSC.ch

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
Low
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Apr 16, 2026 - 05:29 EUVD
15.0.3
CVE Published
Apr 02, 2026 - 08:42 nvd
MEDIUM 5.3

DescriptionCVE.org

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to hide security tags from users by crafting a long subject.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 75% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy