Skip to main content

Bouncy Castle Java CVE-2026-12185

| EUVDEUVD-2026-52021 HIGH
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value (CWE-789)
2026-08-03 bcorg GHSA-9mmj-j2r4-96mp
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: bcorg
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Supply crafted BKS/UBER keystore with Integer.MAX_VALUE length fields
  2. Delivery
    Application calls KeyStore.load() on attacker input
  3. Exploit
    BcKeyStoreSpi reads declared length before MAC check
  4. Execution
    JVM attempts unbounded heap allocation
  5. Persist
    OutOfMemoryError crashes JVM or service thread
  6. Impact
    Availability impact achieved

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory allocation limits
Exploitation Conditions

The application must call KeyStore.load() on attacker-controlled data in BKS or UBER format. Exploitation is completely independent of the password supplied to KeyStore.load() because the unbounded allocation occurs in loadStore() before the integrity MAC is verified. No authentication to the Bouncy Castle library itself is required - the constraint is whether the attacker can influence what keystore data the application loads. This limits exploitation to: applications that accept keystore uploads or remote keystore paths, management interfaces that allow keystore configuration, or any pipeline where externally-sourced BKS/UBER files are processed. Applications that load keystores exclusively from static, application-controlled files on disk are not reachable from this attack path. User interaction in the CVSS context (UI:P) reflects that a human or automated process within the target environment must initiate the KeyStore.load() call.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VA:H) correctly captures the core risk profile: network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges required, but dependent on an application or user action that causes KeyStore.load() to be called with attacker-supplied data (UI:P). The availability impact is High - a single crafted file can crash a JVM unconditionally. EPSS data was not provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from that source; however, the combination of a public POC, a trivially small payload, and the pre-MAC bypass makes this mechanically straightforward for any attacker who can influence keystore input. KEV status is not confirmed, so this is not confirmed as actively exploited in production environments. The 'Information Disclosure' tag in the source data appears to be a mislabeling - the actual impact is pure availability (DoS), with no confidentiality or integrity consequences reflected in the CVSS vector. Real-world risk is moderate-to-high for applications that accept or process externally sourced BKS/UBER keystores; negligible where keystores are only loaded from trusted, application-controlled paths.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can supply a crafted BKS or UBER keystore file - for example via a file upload endpoint, a configuration interface, or a management API that accepts keystore imports - provides a file of a few dozen bytes with one or more length fields set to Integer.MAX_VALUE. When the target application calls KeyStore.load() on this file, BcKeyStoreSpi immediately attempts to allocate a ~2 GB array before reaching the HMAC check, triggering an OutOfMemoryError that crashes the JVM process or the thread handling the request. A POC was submitted by the researcher alongside the report, confirming this is mechanically trivial.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 03, 2026

Bouncy Castle for Java's BKS and UBER keystore implementation crashes with an OutOfMemoryError when loading a crafted keystore because heap allocation from stream-declared lengths occurs before the HMAC integrity check. Any application calling KeyStore.load() with attacker-controlled BKS or UBER keystore data is affected - bc-java before 1.85 and bc-lts-java before 2.73.12. A POC was submitted alongside the report, confirming that a file of just a few dozen bytes declaring Integer.MAX_VALUE-length fields is sufficient to exhaust JVM heap regardless of heap configuration or supplied password. No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the researcher's POC referenced in the patch commit.

RemediationAI

Upgrade bc-java to version 1.85 or later, or bc-lts-java to version 2.73.12 or later, per the vendor advisory at https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE-2026-12185. The upstream fix (commit 7bbd7fe5f44132e5b6140a2914435c12430eeb3d) replaces unbounded array allocations with a readBlock() method capped at 2 MiB (ENTRY_BUF_SIZE), switches certificate-chain decoding to incremental parsing, and adds explicit bounds checks on salt lengths. As a compensating control where patching is not immediately possible, restrict keystore loading to keystores sourced exclusively from trusted, application-controlled storage - never from user-supplied uploads, network paths, or external configuration. This does not fully eliminate risk if the application's own keystore storage could be tampered, but it substantially reduces attacker reachability. If BKS/UBER keystore format support is not required, migrating to PKCS12 format eliminates this code path entirely without availability trade-offs.

Affected VersionsENISA

BC-LTS-JAVA 2.73.0 <2.73.12
BC-JAVA 0 <1.85

Affected Packages

euvd bc_java fix: 1.85
euvd bc_lts_java fix: 2.73.12

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerable code resides in BcKeyStoreSpi.java within the org.bouncycastle.jcajce.provider.keystore.bc package, which implements the proprietary BKS and UBER keystore formats. The root cause (CWE-789, Uncontrolled Memory Allocation) is that length-prefixed fields - certificate chains, key blobs, secrets, sealed entries, and salt values - were deserialized using raw new byte[dIn.readInt()] calls, allocating the full attacker-declared size without any upper-bound check. The critical aggravating factor is sequencing: loadStore() performs these allocations before the HMAC integrity MAC is validated, so the password is irrelevant and no valid credential is needed to trigger the OOM. Affected CPEs are cpe:2.3:a:legion_of_the_bouncy_castle_inc.:bc-java and cpe:2.3:a:legion_of_the_bouncy_castle_inc.:bc-lts-java across all versions prior to the fix.

Know when Java gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (bcorg) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Amber
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable with no privileges; user/app interaction required to call KeyStore.load(); pure availability impact via OOM crash.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (bcorg).

CVSS VectorVendor: bcorg

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, BKS/UBER keystore allocates from untrusted lengths before integrity check. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Bouncy Castle for Java (bc-java and bc-lts-java) contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that crashes JVM instances when processing crafted keystore files, affecting any application using these cryptographic libraries to load untrusted keystores. Organizations relying on these libraries face immediate service availability risk if keystores from untrusted sources are processed.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely used Java cryptography library across enterprise and open-source ecosystems
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

More in Java

View all
CVE-2012-4681 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 28

Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m

CVE-2015-7450 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 02

Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti

CVE-2013-2465 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 18

Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent

CVE-2011-3544 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 19

Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug

CVE-2010-1871 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 05

JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to

CVE-2012-1723 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up

CVE-2013-0422 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 10

Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using

CVE-2012-0507 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 07

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up

CVE-2015-4852 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 18

The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers

CVE-2012-5076 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow

CVE-2017-3066 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 27

Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla

CVE-2012-0391 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 08

The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Development Tools 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy